![]() |
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 32874078)
there is quite a good percentage of people wearing masks in situations where they don't need to do so, i.e. walking around outside, on bikes even.
|
I wear a mask when walking down the main streets of Brighton. Once I'm off those I take it off. Looks like a lot of other people are doing that as well.
|
Originally Posted by :D!
(Post 32878628)
If they are walking or cycling between places where masks are required, for example taking public transport and then walking to a shop, it may be preferable to keep the mask on to avoid touching it unnecessarily.
|
These last few posts have given me an idea. I think I'll try the mask for my morning constitutional.
|
Originally Posted by tjcxx
(Post 32879306)
These last few posts have given me an idea. I think I'll try the mask for my morning constitutionial.
|
Originally Posted by tjcxx
(Post 32879306)
These last few posts have given me an idea. I think I'll try the mask for my morning constitutionial.
Can't see myself cycling with one on, though. Mind you, the couriers have been managing it for years. |
Distress is a valid reason to not wear a mask. I find them distressing so do not wear them as is my right.
|
Originally Posted by flyingcrazy
(Post 32880132)
Distress is a valid reason to not wear a mask. I find them distressing so do not wear them as is my right.
Not all regimes put a self-declaration of distress above public health concerns. |
Originally Posted by IAN-UK
(Post 32880416)
Then you must be careful about where your travels take you.
Not all regimes put a self-declaration of distress above public health concerns. by the way all this talk about London tier 3, would they bother before Xmas? Not like one week or tier 3 before everyone goes to see each other for a week for Xmas would make a difference. If anything they can get away with a stricter January as it’s dead quiet first few weeks anyway even without a lockdown. i have to say after Sweden and Switzerland the uk has been the most chilled out about the whole thing |
Has there been a more restrictive update for tier 3? I was reading that pubs could remain open if you had food with a meal. Is this now not the case and any pub (or restaurant) is completely closed for business?
|
Originally Posted by IAN-UK
(Post 32880416)
Then you must be careful about where your travels take you.
Not all regimes put a self-declaration of distress above public health concerns. |
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 32881805)
Has there been a more restrictive update for tier 3? I was reading that pubs could remain open if you had food with a meal. Is this now not the case and any pub (or restaurant) is completely closed for business?
|
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 32881805)
Has there been a more restrictive update for tier 3? I was reading that pubs could remain open if you had food with a meal. Is this now not the case and any pub (or restaurant) is completely closed for business?
|
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32882248)
In England since 2 December in tier 3 pubs and restaurants cannot open and serve drinks and food for consumption on premises. In tier 2 they can open and serve drinks with a meal. There isn’t any change to this since 2 December.
|
Originally Posted by KARFA
(Post 32882248)
In England since 2 December in tier 3 pubs and restaurants cannot open and serve drinks and food for consumption on premises. In tier 2 they can open and serve drinks with a meal. There isn’t any change to this since 2 December.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:10 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.