Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Apple iPhone...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 11:15 am
  #166  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted by nd_eric_77
Will it allow people to use iTunes as ringtones?
As it turns out, apparently you can't use your iTunes music as ringtones.


Customization: While the background can be set at any time from any picture on the unit - a really nice feature - ringtones cannot be set based on your iTunes Music, according to Apple, a limitation based on rights issues (read: the music industry). This is pretty surprising.
http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/ipo...hone-hands-on/
StudentExplorer is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 11:24 am
  #167  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by StudentExplorer
As it turns out, apparently you can't use your iTunes music as ringtones.




http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/ipo...hone-hands-on/
Just one of the many things they messed up. Not being able to sync over WiFi is the other.
ScottC is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 11:42 am
  #168  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: RDM
Programs: UA General Member
Posts: 1,247
Originally Posted by StudentExplorer
As it turns out, apparently you can't use your iTunes music as ringtones.




http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/ipo...hone-hands-on/
I'm sure this was a concession to Cingular as they make a truckload of money off ringtones.
winkydink is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 12:14 pm
  #169  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redwood Shores, CA
Programs: UA 1P, HH Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 743
I'm sure there'll be an unbranded version out somewhere (prolly not in the US). But I can't believe that Apple signed deals with major carriers from all the GSM countries.

I believe that there will be folks hacking the crippled OSX...

Just wait for the dust to settle and the 2nd generation version.
bobes is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 1:01 pm
  #170  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South
Posts: 997
Originally Posted by Tummy
That's really presumptuous of you to think that everyone has the same needs or wants as you do from a device. Also to think that everyone has the same financial constrains and is bad with managing credit.
My needs for a phone:

1. Dial number
2. Have conversation
3. Hang up

What are your needs exactly?

As for financial constraints, aside from the high brow, everyone makes $250K a year and travels only 1st class FT crowd, the vast majority of iPhone purchases will be made on credit cards by people who will pay obscene interest rates to own a toy they don't need.
ediddy is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 1:32 pm
  #171  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
This forum is neither the time or place to be discussing how someone plans to pay for the device. Whether or not someone plans to pay for it on a high interest CC is of no relevance to this thread.
ScottC is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 1:34 pm
  #172  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by ediddy
My needs for a phone:

1. Dial number
2. Have conversation
3. Hang up
My needs are being able to remotely access my contacts and appointments, send and receive email, manage servers using SSH, doing some basic web browsing.

I'd say that 90% of my time on the phone is for email and text messaging, with the remaining 10% in real conversations.

Like the previous poster said, everyone has different needs on their phone.
ScottC is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 2:51 pm
  #173  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 23,178
Watching the video, a few observations...

1. Using iTunes to have to synchronize EVERYTHING. I'm sure there will be 3rd-party apps down the road that will allow you to not use iTunes, but that won't be for a while (maybe until 2G comes out).
2. I wonder if you can use the touch-screen keyboard in a landscape mode (and hopefully have slightly bigger "keys"). I guess it doesn't because, the way you would probably hold the phone, you're prone to hit the Sleep/Wake button.
3. The UI and screen is very cool.

Like ediddy, I only use my phone for the most basic of functions (calls, a few photos, a few text messages), so the iPhone isn't all that appealing to me. However, I think the iPhone is pretty revolutionary, and I'm excited to see how Nokia, Samsung, SE, etc. will respond.
pseudoswede is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 4:36 pm
  #174  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin TX
Programs: Mr Swise: AAdvantage LifetimePlt/3MM, HH Dmnd, SPG Plt
Posts: 1,451
A lot of people only use their computers for surfing the web, email and document writing. But when you make it easy to, say, edit movies, manage digital photos, or manage music libraries digitally, those same people embrace this capability and add it to their needs.

Their computers may have always been able to do all those things, but it required the user to learn how to use the applications to perform those tasks.

Sometimes you can be successful bringing the mountain to Mohamed if you're careful in your design and execution.

Good design enables the user to have a comfortable point of entry and then a gentle slope progressing to greater capability.

This is the model Apple has used in design of all of their products. I think we're seeing it here, too, with the iPhone.

The result is that my 63 year-old mother who is baffled by her blackberry (why she got it in the first place we'll never know) could be texting on an iPhone in no time without the constant visits to the store to have her hand held as she learns (and learns again) the basic functions of the device. At the same time, my fiance can still SSH into his home lab on the very same unit that my mother is able to use and understand. Creating a product that my mother can pick up and -use- fully and without help that still is useful and appeals to my geek is a pretty good feat, imo.
swise is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 4:48 pm
  #175  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K, Starwood/Marriott Plat, Others of little note
Posts: 1,148
Originally Posted by Tummy
Didn't think they would be able to use iPhone.
They're getting sued.
jedison is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 5:42 pm
  #176  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
How well will that touch screen hold up in a pocket, which may have other things in it from time to time (e.g. keys, coins, papers)?
Doppy is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 6:46 pm
  #177  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by bobes
I'm sure there'll be an unbranded version out somewhere (prolly not in the US). But I can't believe that Apple signed deals with major carriers from all the GSM countries.
They don't need to. They never said they'd be selling it everywhere. One for UK, one or two for the Continent, and one for the only GSM provider in Japan. Done. Maybe when the exclusivity deal is up they'll start selling them unlocked...
Originally Posted by bobes
I believe that there will be folks hacking the crippled OSX...
A crude protection scheme: drop the OS on regular ROM (not flashable). That, plus the famed lack of a system registry (to alter phone settings) will limit what hackers can do.
bluemonq is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 7:37 pm
  #178  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 2,093
Originally Posted by ClueByFour
The issue (according to some in the know at Cisco) is that Apple does not want to pay to play (literally and figuratively) for the Iphone moniker. And they will lose this one to Cisco and lose large--the original trademark dates to about 1996. They've (Cisco) been shipping stuff with "IPhone" on the plastic and in the materials for a year now.

I hope the slick marketing people at Apple can come up with something besides "phone" to tack behind the "i" on this.

Apple may get it elsewhere. But not in the US.
The plot thickens.
murphy is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 7:40 pm
  #179  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by derpelikan
i am not a standard user. i have a lot apps runnin and syncing etc. , using wifi, 3G , skype, msn, icq, etc etc. at one time.

wm5 might be enough for people who only check emails and their calender, i am doing much more and for this symbian seems to be more stable.
When I was borrowing a HTC Universal for a month, doing all of that wasn't a big deal (never needed to use 3G). Managing a number of websites, almost constantly in a VNC session, running conference calls, and listening to streaming radio simultaneously - hardly things that "people who only check emails and their calender" do. Never froze or crashed, though it did slow down a bit...when I was using BitTorrent to grab a Linux distro. Can your P990 handle that?
Originally Posted by derpelikan
but after seing how slim the apple is, i would love to see that thing with 3G...
Why? You'd have to wait for Apple to clear applications for use, like Skype and whatever you use for SIP, not to mention all the messenging programs you seem to fond of.
Originally Posted by derpelikan
if it is so slim, an battary pack for that would only power such kind of device for 10hours if it was 3G.
LOL!

10 hours on 3G would be a dream with the current battery. As it stands, they rate it up to 5 hours "in active use". Even trusting Apple that it really would function for 5 hours...3G would eat the battery for desert.
bluemonq is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 5:44 am
  #180  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Close to the beach
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K, DL GM, Tumlare Bussresor Super Class
Posts: 6,972
Originally Posted by mikew99
if it succeeds, it will be because Apple (in their typical fashion) has made it work exceedingly well.
Or because Apple fans think that it works well just because it says 'Apple' on it...
I mean, if it's from Apple, it must be better than the competition, right?
Who would admit they made a mistake when buying a $600 Apple phone instead of a $400 'other brand' phone that works better?
I predict that most iPhone owners will say that they are very happy with their phone since they wouldn't want to admit that they were fooled by the Apple hype.
Vunder31 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.