![]() |
Hate it! :(
But thanks FT for allowing me to disable it (as explained in post #2). Because of that, we're still good... ^ :) |
Originally Posted by MaxVO
(Post 27790625)
The opt-out should be by default.
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
(Post 27790670)
Yes, I do find it mind numbingly insular that people think "oh I have a great idea so let's make everyone have it, they'll love it too".
When new features are in the works, we make every effort to weigh business and community considerations, and then make a decision based on our best possible balance between both. In the case of Infinite Scroll, opt-out was the best choice for our purposes, and to give every user a shot at trying something they might otherwise never have bothered to even turn on. |
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 27782614)
If you have a questions, comment or bug report regarding the new implementation of "infinite scroll" for the desktop (non-mobile) version of FlyerTalk, please use this thread.
|
Originally Posted by pitflyer
(Post 27791569)
Also hate this new feature especially since it screws up my back button (apparently every time it scrolls it adds another entry to the back queue, at least in Chrome, making back button unusable). Opting out. I wish it would be opt in period since now if I browse without being logged in I'm stuck with this bad behavior.
Edit: actually they are still there but I think other posts have been moved into this thread. |
Originally Posted by pitflyer
(Post 27791569)
Also hate this new feature especially since it screws up my back button (apparently every time it scrolls it adds another entry to the back queue, at least in Chrome, making back button unusable). Opting out. I wish it would be opt in period since now if I browse without being logged in I'm stuck with this bad behavior.
|
Originally Posted by ebuck
(Post 27791685)
Agree with Pitflyer on this. This new "feature" completely makes it impossible to use the back button. Instead of trying to do both (infinite scroll and finite messages per page), in the option where you can select the number of posts to see per page, just add an "All" as an option.
1. Are you using a mobile device? 2. When you click and hold "Back" in your browser, does it display as: "Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3" (for example) |
I don't mind trying new things, but having some problems with this (using Safari on iPad). Apart from the irritation when the page flickers as you get to the bottom, when I try to post using the reply or quick reply links, it always quotes a post in the box (not necessarily the last one). I'm not going to delete text every time I post. If I'm doing something wrong, please tell me, otherwise I will opt out until that is fixed.
|
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 27791753)
For EVERYONE having trouble with the back button, two questions:
1. Are you using a mobile device? 2. When you click and hold "Back" in your browser, does it display as: "Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3" (for example) 2: It was showing the same thread for each but the page number was out of the box and I have now disabled the option. |
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 27791302)
Here's their answer in the other thread on opt-in:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/27788362-post4.html |
I have always wanted infinite scroll (I hate pages), but am not seeing it on my laptop in Chrome.
ETA: Ok, I logged out and back in. Now I can scroll down two full pages at a time (for me, that's 80 posts), but it will not go any farther. If I start at the top of page 1 I can get to post 80 by continuously scrolling, but then I have to select page 3, at which point I can scroll to post 160 but it again stops. Maybe it wasn't tested in the scenario where one has selected more posts/page than the default, as I have? |
Originally Posted by Bonehead
(Post 27792376)
If I start at the top of page 1 I can get to post 80 by continuously scrolling, but then I have to select page 3, at which point I can scroll to post 160 but it again stops.
Maybe it wasn't tested in the scenario where one has selected more posts/page than the default, as I have? |
Originally Posted by MADPhil
(Post 27791851)
1: Firefox 50.1.0 on OSX 10.12.2 on an iMac
2: It was showing the same thread for each but the page number was out of the box and I have now disabled the option. |
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 27791753)
For EVERYONE having trouble with the back button, two questions:
1. Are you using a mobile device? 2. When you click and hold "Back" in your browser, does it display as: "Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3 Page 2 Page 3" (for example) 2. Yes Disabled this "feature." Bottom bar took up too much real estate, couldn't use "back" in browser, just overall very annoying functionality. |
Originally Posted by IBobi
(Post 27782614)
If you have a questions, comment or bug report regarding the new implementation of "infinite scroll" for the desktop (non-mobile) version of FlyerTalk, please use this thread.
Anyway, what I wanted to say is that I find the bar takes up too much screen space on the iPad. And has an annoying flicker when you reach the bottom of the page. |
Originally Posted by flyingbee
(Post 27793257)
I just hit quick reply and the form came pre-filled with the quote above. I wasn't trying to quote it! I was going to do a multi quote but didn't see the button.
Anyway, what I wanted to say is that I find the bar takes up too much screen space on the iPad. And has an annoying flicker when you reach the bottom of the page. |
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 27791302)
Here's their answer in the other thread on opt-in:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/27788362-post4.html |
Hi all,
We have rolled this feature back to fix bugs. Thank you for all your reports! |
Why not on top ?
At the bottom of a forum page I found the choice of FT Desktop or infinite scroll. Choosing here carries the choice over to any topic page.
Can someone, anyone, explain why that option can't be at the top of the page ? Having a choice is nice. But why not make it easier ? _Mych |
Originally Posted by Mych
(Post 27793635)
At the bottom of a forum page I found the choice of FT Desktop or infinite scroll. Choosing here carries the choice over to any topic page.
Can someone, anyone, explain why that option can't be at the top of the page ? Having a choice is nice. But why not make it easier ? _Mych You have to use the global (per user) options. Unfortunately there's no way to have per-browser instance preferences. -David |
I saw the floating bar earlier but not currently (on desktop both times). I just double-checked that I'm not marked as opted out. Did it get turned off?
Personally, I found it useful but distracting. How about just having a floating "jump to top (or bottom)" button instead? Much less distracting and space-hogging, but almost as useful. |
Originally Posted by SpammersAreScum
(Post 27794407)
I saw the floating bar earlier but not currently (on desktop both times). I just double-checked that I'm not marked as opted out. Did it get turned off?
|
Originally Posted by SpammersAreScum
(Post 27794407)
How about just having a floating "jump to top (or bottom)" button instead? Much less distracting and space-hogging, but almost as useful.
|
Originally Posted by LIH Prem
(Post 27794302)
For one thing, it doesn't stick. It's sort of useless IMO. Been discussed earlier in the thread. (I think it should stick, IB says it's hard to do. Maybe it's one of the things they will reconsider now that they rolled it back.)
You have to use the global (per user) options. Unfortunately there's no way to have per-browser instance preferences. -David This is similar to what happens when accessing the site from my andriod tablet. The site automatcally decides to present the mobile style and the option of the desktop style is at the bottom of the page. _Mych |
Whether you put it at the top or the bottom or both, there's still the problem that this interacts poorly with infinite scroll. Did you mean to scroll to the next page, or were you trying to scroll just far enough to access the bar? Oops, you went one pixel too far, guess you wanted to load the next page LOL
|
Just don't make it the default when you roll it out again, if you want people to use it let them try it of their own free will. Simples.
|
When this feature was available I was using Chrome on a Windows machine (not mobile) and the back button would fill up with Page 3, Page 4, Page 5, etc as I infinite scrolled.
I would also HIGHLY recommend that any future rollout of such a feature be OPT IN. |
Originally Posted by MADPhil
(Post 27794477)
See post #96
If you end up turning off infinite scroll, though, it's a compromise you might want to consider. |
Originally Posted by MaxVO
(Post 27795053)
Anything floating will be distracting.
|
For some reason, my opting out of infinite scroll reverted back to opt in overnight.
|
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 27849249)
For some reason, my opting out of infinite scroll reverted back to opt in overnight.
Personally, I don't find it very distracting. Just glitchy, especially at the bottom of the page. |
I already did disable it again. Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 27849465)
I already did disable it again. Thanks.
If you're going to allow the opt-out, make it universal, no exemptions. |
I HATE infinite scroll. I rarely go to the trouble to complain, but this feature drove me to seek out this thread.
At least there seems to be an opt-out, but seriously who is looking for this? I can only imagine it is driven by the advertising side somehow |
Originally Posted by RandomNobody
(Post 27849855)
Yeah, but they ignore your preferences for certain forums. It even says so in the setting. It shows low respect to their membership when I've clearly set a preference, but some forums (like the TSS subforums) ignore that preference and display infinite scroll anyway.
If you're going to allow the opt-out, make it universal, no exemptions. |
It works poorly in low bandwidth environments, such as most Hotel's free wifi - you device freezes while loading more - disable, disable, disable.
|
Originally Posted by RandomNobody
(Post 27849855)
Yeah, but they ignore your preferences for certain forums. It even says so in the setting. It shows low respect to their membership when I've clearly set a preference, but some forums (like the TSS subforums) ignore that preference and display infinite scroll anyway.
If you're going to allow the opt-out, make it universal, no exemptions.
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 27850302)
In the options checkbox to disable desktop auto-scroll I don't see anything that states it's left enabled on some forums. But I may well have missed it. Where are you seeing this?
|
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 27850302)
In the options checkbox to disable desktop auto-scroll I don't see anything that states it's left enabled on some forums. But I may well have missed it. Where are you seeing this?
There is more than one skin in which you can view the forums. If you would like to switch to a different skin, select it from this list. Please note that some forums here may override your skin choice temporarily. |
Originally Posted by soy
(Post 27849898)
I HATE infinite scroll. I rarely go to the trouble to complain, but this feature drove me to seek out this thread.
At least there seems to be an opt-out, but seriously who is looking for this? I can only imagine it is driven by the advertising side somehow I suspect (1) this allows backdoors for more data mining; and (2) guarantees eternal employment for the IT folks. |
Here's a new one. I have infinite scroll disabled but now it pops up regardless. Seriously - this is the worst implementation of anything on this website to date.
|
Originally Posted by dodgeflyer
(Post 27853930)
Here's a new one. I have infinite scroll disabled but now it pops up regardless. Seriously - this is the worst implementation of anything on this website to date.
Also, when I change it from the drop menu on the bottom page bar and then move to the next page of a thread, the bar/function pops up again in the new page. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:36 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.