![]() |
The post count, in my opinion, is part of the problem, not the solution.
FT has changed. Post padding lowers the content value of the board as a whole. Post count chasers often carry an attitude that other styles of posters do not. I fully support the hiding of all post counts. As for the motion, I don't care either way. Omni-ites seem to want them to count. Seems trivial to me, but what's good for the goose should also be good for the gander. |
Originally Posted by seanthepilot
(Post 17779453)
Omni-ites seem to want them to count. Seems trivial to me, but what's good for the goose should also be good for the gander.
While I will agree some people live there, perhaps it's because they no longer travel, or don't have anything or much to add to a M&P forum. I can say that it is what happened to me. Technology made it easier to do my job from where I am versus going to a location. Does that mean I no longer should be able to shoot the breeze with some long time friends? Do I not have anything valuable to add to a M&P forum? I still contribute where ever and when ever I can, sometimes in Omni, sometimes in a M&P forum. But I keep coming back for the community aspect of this forum. This is about consistency of treatment of off-topic posts. Some, because they are in a M&P forum, or one that counts, such as community (the contest threads) are valued by this community, while some have no value to the community. So far I haven't seen anyone who opposes treating all posts equally address the consistency issue at all, except to say don't count any post (which I would favor). |
Opposed. As this is a travel related site, post count (if we are to have one at all) should measure participation in such discussions. I understand the need for OMNI forums to exist, but don't think they should be included in post count.
|
How about all the other forums and threads that have nothing to do with travel?
|
I have read many good posts in this thread.
Does anyone care to do the math here? How many posters are pro/con? I do realize that some TBers have made election promises, but its rather impossible I guess to know if they got any votes for this particular one. One would hope that enough of these posters would back that opinion here. Im sitting with the feeling there is a clear majority against this motion (me included). I would hope TB would use this opportunity to more carefully evaluate the need and purpose for posts counts/titles. Hide post counts (show in profile)? Scrap the idea totally? Zero all counts with new rules? It could end up showing any post counting is counterproductive. |
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 17779605)
This in no way is directed specifically at you... but you've hit the problem right on the head... Omni-ites. It's a hold over from Randy's belief there shouldn't be an off-topic area, and it was he who created this second class citizen status.
While I will agree some people live there, perhaps it's because they no longer travel, or don't have anything or much to add to a M&P forum. I can say that it is what happened to me. Technology made it easier to do my job from where I am versus going to a location. Does that mean I no longer should be able to shoot the breeze with some long time friends? Do I not have anything valuable to add to a M&P forum? I still contribute where ever and when ever I can, sometimes in Omni, sometimes in a M&P forum. But I keep coming back for the community aspect of this forum. This is about consistency of treatment of off-topic posts. Some, because they are in a M&P forum, or one that counts, such as community (the contest threads) are valued by this community, while some have no value to the community. So far I haven't seen anyone who opposes treating all posts equally address the consistency issue at all, except to say don't count any post (which I would favor). It's the internet, it is not worth stressing over or thinking about! |
Originally Posted by travelkid
(Post 17780696)
I have read many good posts in this thread.
Does anyone care to do the math here? How many posters are pro/con? I do realize that some TBers have made election promises, but its rather impossible I guess to know if they got any votes for this particular one. One would hope that enough of these posters would back that opinion here. Im sitting with the feeling there is a clear majority against this motion (me included). I would hope TB would use this opportunity to more carefully evaluate the need and purpose for posts counts/titles. Hide post counts (show in profile)? Scrap the idea totally? Zero all counts with new rules? It could end up showing any post counting is counterproductive. |
Originally Posted by RichMSN
(Post 17780866)
I don't see this as an opportunity, actually. I see this motion as an relatively quick up/down and then I plan on not talking about post counts again this year.
It seems the main reason for some on TB to support this is that they are backed by their voters (and probably also feel themselves that its right). With respect for not only the voters but all members, and as this is as you say "relatively quick up/down", could we try a new approach? Could we set up a 2 week fully announced member poll? CD could/should use that as advice. Simple questions need simple solutions^ |
Originally Posted by travelkid
(Post 17780696)
Does anyone care to do the math here? How many posters are pro/con?
The Talk Board could readily activate the polling feature if they wanted a sense how the membership felt. Probably wouldn't get more than 1,000 votes, though, just like in the last election. |
Originally Posted by tom911
(Post 17781707)
Better to ask how many FTers are even aware there is a Talk Board forum. With only 1,000 voting in the last election there's clearly a large block that doesn't care what the Talk Board does. A lot of FTers that post in the Talk Board forum are regulars here and have been for years.
The Talk Board could readily activate the polling feature if they wanted a sense how the membership felt. Probably wouldn't get more than 1,000 votes, though, just like in the last election. I think that such a result would be pretty representational. |
Originally Posted by travelkid
(Post 17781770)
1000 people asked seems to be a magic number in many professional surveys.
I think that such a result would be pretty representational. |
Originally Posted by Analise
(Post 17772817)
What is the point of having post counts? Why are they necessary?
|
Originally Posted by RichMSN
(Post 17777656)
I ran for TB partially because I disagreed with what the TB did last year. People voted for me, possibly because they agreed with me. And then my hands should be tied? I'm sorry if you voted for me and think I'm not representing you, but if you read this debate thread, koko and I made it very clear that one of us would make the motion and the other would second it. Why would we break our campaign promises?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...ni-omnipr.html If you break your election promise because the community states that they are not in favour, then who are you harming exactly? You'll be doing more harm by sticking to something that the community does not support.
Originally Posted by RichMSN
(Post 17777656)
Like Congress, this is a representative body. I'm elected to vote my conscience. On some issues where I feel I need guidance from members of FT, I'll hold back my vote and see if people have ideas that guide me. On this one, I made the motion and voted immediately.
Originally Posted by RichMSN
(Post 17777656)
Unlike Congress, I am not going to be guided solely by "how will this affect my chances of getting re-elected?"
Originally Posted by kipper
(Post 17778306)
I wouldn't be in favor of a motion that prohibits members from bringing up previously defeated motions, in part because as TB elections occur, and TB members are replaced, a motion that was previously defeated might then stand a chance of being passed.
Originally Posted by travelkid
(Post 17780696)
I do realize that some TBers have made election promises, but its rather impossible I guess to know if they got any votes for this particular one. One would hope that enough of these posters would back that opinion here. Im sitting with the feeling there is a clear majority against this motion (me included).
It is not the motion itself that is much of an issue here for me, it's the attitude of our newly elected members, implying that they are going to ignore the community that they say they serve. I'm really disappointed and shocked that none of the TB members seem to see that turning their backs on the community is an issue in itself. If the TB won't listen to members, then there is no point in voting and no point in expressing any views. A sad time. |
Ok - so I've attempted to tally up the opinions as best I could based on who has posted in this thread - correct me if I'm wrong (but note that I should be packing as I'm heading to DC to fly to IST tomorrow & will have VERY limited access through the 17th).
Majority that have expressed what I believe to be a clear opinion at this time are against this motion. Feel free to clarify and correct me...apologies in advance if I've spelled your handle wrong. Note that this tally does not include TB members. Despite the edits, this only includes members who posted prior to this posts' original post. YES - 13 MEMBERS Mary2e wharvey Chillinthemost thelark ewrfox Skyman65 kipper RKG ItsHip2B^2 Jinxy SirFlysALot anonplz GUWonder NO - 22 MEMBERS Jenbel dchristva delta747 as219 canolakid lo2e CPRich tcook052 travelkid CMK10 OverThereTooMuch origin Eastbay1k BadTime alesir HansGolden painintheuk Ritz javabytes tom911 lin821 Steph3n DON'T CARE - 8 MEMBERS LIH prem Cordelli Kagehitokiri janetdoe 84fiero JerryFF hhoope01 MissJoeyDFW NO POSTS AT ALL (OR HIDE ALL POSTS) - 6 MEMBERS flyinbob eightblack Markie DenverBrian Steph3n seanthepilot POSTED IN THREAD, BUT NO CLEAR OPINION STATED (at least not crystal clear to me, IMHO) - 12 MEMBERS Prospero Canarsie nerd N830MH notsosmart aztimm corruptcanadian Analise PhoenixRev matthandy oliver2002 njx9 |
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 17779605)
While I will agree some people live there, perhaps it's because they no longer travel...
When I joined FT, I traveled quite a bit for business, and was a frequent poster in the M&P forums. My job changed, and I now travel much less frequently--and usually only for leisure. So I don't visit the M&P forums as much. Does this mean I should stop posting in Omni unless I can meet some arbitrary M&P/Omni post ratio? Sorry, but over the years, I've developed many relationships with posters through conversations in Omni, and I'm not going to just abandon them because I currently have less interest in or need for the M&P forums. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.