Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EVA * application is in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:51 pm
  #31  
LAX
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: FA
Posts: 6,482
Originally Posted by Santander
Well whatever it is, they'd better hurry up. I want to earn AC (or whatever *A FFP I switch to by then) miles flying BR...
+1! I really want to try out BR to Asia as its fares are pretty competitive.

LAX
LAX is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:51 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,700
Originally Posted by Santander
Well whatever it is, they'd better hurry up. I want to earn AC (or whatever *A FFP I switch to by then) miles flying BR...
I also suspect that there will be a decent number of fare restrictions when it does happen.
username is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 12:34 am
  #33  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,773
Originally Posted by LAX
+1! I really want to try out BR to Asia as its fares are pretty competitive.

LAX
you get what you pay for
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 10:12 am
  #34  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,152
BR Premium Economy is barely tolerable...but definitely better than regular coach. There are some decent business class sales being run periodically - but as mentioned elsewhere, watch those fare classes.

If you don't want to fly CO or UA to Asia, I would strongly recommend AC as the backup choice, not BR.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 10:23 am
  #35  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI / SFO
Programs: UA*G, AC*S, Marriott LTP, National Exec
Posts: 3,893
Originally Posted by bocastephen
If you don't want to fly CO or UA to Asia, I would strongly recommend AC as the backup choice, not BR.
I already fly BR occasionally intra-Asia in Elite so I know what to expect. Even I Y I think I would rather fly BR than UA.
Santander is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 10:21 pm
  #36  
LAX
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: FA
Posts: 6,482
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
you get what you pay for
How much worse than E- on UA can it be??

LAX
LAX is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 10:24 am
  #37  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
Originally Posted by Metropolitan Airlines
Provided most European destination by BR need a transit stop at Bangkok, I am interested whether TG and OS will not approve its addition or there will be a condition that BR will need to divert its LHR, AMS and VIE routes to Hong Kong
I don't think it will happen - I think PEK still does not allow Republic of China (i.e. Taiwan) carriers to overfly China en route to Europe - thus they have to fly via BKK or overfly Korea/Russia.
TPJ is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 8:40 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: VIEAMS
Programs: FB,BD,LH,EK,PC,HH,MR
Posts: 821
Why is that?
jexelot is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 9:01 am
  #39  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,773
Because it is impossible to grant carriers the right to overfly if the country they are based in doesn't exist...

FWIW, PRC carriers can't fly over Taiwan either, but since Taiwan is tiny and out of the way, it doesn't really matter...
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 12:26 pm
  #40  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,152
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
Because it is impossible to grant carriers the right to overfly if the country they are based in doesn't exist......
Pardon?
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 12:58 pm
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,651
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Pardon?
The Peoples Republic of China (aka China) sees the Republic of China (aka Taiwan) as a rgue province and not a separate country. Information on the history of the dispute can be found here.
Xyzzy is online now  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 1:26 pm
  #42  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI / SFO
Programs: UA*G, AC*S, Marriott LTP, National Exec
Posts: 3,893
Originally Posted by jexelot
Why is that?
The same thing happens for North and South Korean airlines, they do not fly into each others' airspace because their governments do not recognise each others' legitimacy or sovereignty. This is of no importance to North Korean airlines (oops, airline) because they have no need to overfly the South, but for Southern airlines they always stay well clear of the border when taking off or landing at ICN.

Btw, neither China or Taiwan officially consider Taiwan to be a separate country. Both governments claim they are the legitimate government of the whole of China and Taiwan and do not recognise each other. So in this sense, Taiwan doesn't exist as a country de jure. Of course de facto it is.
Santander is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 1:40 pm
  #43  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,152
Originally Posted by Xyzzy
The Peoples Republic of China (aka China) sees the Republic of China (aka Taiwan) as a rgue province and not a separate country. Information on the history of the dispute can be found here.
I know that I was disputing the notion that Taiwan is not a real country. Personally, I consider mainland China as the rogue and Taiwan as the standard-bearer for Chinese culture, but that's just me

Now on point, has anyone tried the new (and apparently not improved) EVA Premium Economy product? I have a friend who tried it recently and said it wasn't really that much better than coach and the seats were small and uncomfortable.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 4:08 pm
  #44  
30 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near SEA
Programs: UA MM, AS MVPG75K, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,988
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Pardon?
China doesn't acknowledge Taiwan as a separate country, therefore they can't grant flyover rights to them as such.

Which begs the question... if they consider Taiwan part of China, shouldn't EVA flights going over China be a domestic airline?
bmvaughn is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 7:00 pm
  #45  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,773
Originally Posted by bmvaughn
Which begs the question... if they consider Taiwan part of China, shouldn't EVA flights going over China be a domestic airline?
Since the Taiwanese Carriers don't report to the Aviation Governing Body of the PRC, they are lucky that they aren't grounded
PVDtoDEL is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.