Pre-boarders should be forced to sit in the back of the plane
#106
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
With all the pre-board abuse resentment, it may be time for advance request/notice stipulating the need for Rows 1-3 and then assign seats, accordingly. Not all pre-boarders require what your companion does. The premium purchasers retain more value if aisle seats at front stay un-assigned.
Most walk-aboard pre-boarders probably agree.
Most walk-aboard pre-boarders probably agree.
#107
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
If so, you can't do that as it's illegal.
I've said multiple times I don't have an answer for how to weed out people who claim to have a disability but don't and are abusing the preboard privilege. So not sure how I'm being part of the solution. Unless, of course, you were just being facetious.
Some of us who preboard need the room of the bulkhead. For example, I need it for my service dog. While he may fit under a standard seat, barely, it will be really close. We will all be much more comfortable if he is in the bulkhead.
We need to get off first because he needs to go to the relief area. There is not one on the plane for him - he has to hold it the entire time. You are able to use the facilities but he cannot.
Also, since he doesn't fit into the facilities on the plane with me, it means that I can't go either. So WE are in a hurry to get off. Hence, we don't wait until last to deplane.
There are more reasons than the obvious.
We need to get off first because he needs to go to the relief area. There is not one on the plane for him - he has to hold it the entire time. You are able to use the facilities but he cannot.
Also, since he doesn't fit into the facilities on the plane with me, it means that I can't go either. So WE are in a hurry to get off. Hence, we don't wait until last to deplane.
There are more reasons than the obvious.
#108
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,513
Carriers are required (§382.81) "to block an adequate number of the seats used to provide disabled seating accommodations."
Anyone needing an aisle chair to access the aircraft "must be provided a seat in a row with a movable aisle armrest."
Allowing walk-aboard pre-boarders taking seats before the less-mobile, special-needs passengers poses huge downside consequences.
#109
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,513
#110
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Ultimately, it's really not their problem. They are just following the law.
#111
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
The feds may impose the solution. It's a Chinese fire drill right now.
Carriers are required (§382.81) "to block an adequate number of the seats used to provide disabled seating accommodations."
Anyone needing an aisle chair to access the aircraft "must be provided a seat in a row with a movable aisle armrest."
Allowing walk-aboard pre-boarders taking seats before the less-mobile, special-needs passengers poses huge downside consequences.
Carriers are required (§382.81) "to block an adequate number of the seats used to provide disabled seating accommodations."
Anyone needing an aisle chair to access the aircraft "must be provided a seat in a row with a movable aisle armrest."
Allowing walk-aboard pre-boarders taking seats before the less-mobile, special-needs passengers poses huge downside consequences.
But that's not the point is it? The point is that you're right and my companion and I should just be grateful that we're allowed out of the house. Next time we fly we'll board after the C group and say thank you to everyone on the plane. Happy now.
#112
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
I'm sure it would be legal. On some airplanes Delta will black out the bulk head seats from being selected unless someone calls with a disability or is travelling with a service animal until t-24 and then open them up at check in. Fortunately this has never happened to me when I've had a bulkhead but I have heard reports of people being booted out of their bulkhead is someone with a disability buys a seat at the last minute or SDC or doesn't call ahead of time to say they need a bulkhead due to a disability (I've also heard of this happening with handheld infants on aircraft where there are bassinette hooks on the bulk head walls).
#113
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Here's what isn't legal:
Airlines may not keep anyone out of a specific seat on the basis of disability, or require anyone to sit in a particular seat on the basis of disability, except to comply with FAA or foreign-government safety requirements.
About the ACAA
Airlines may not keep anyone out of a specific seat on the basis of disability, or require anyone to sit in a particular seat on the basis of disability, except to comply with FAA or foreign-government safety requirements.
About the ACAA
Last edited by justhere; Oct 10, 2016 at 7:36 pm Reason: Fixed incorrect link
#115
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
I was thinking of this thread last night. I flew out of ATL on another airline and the inbound was late. There were five employees with wheelchairs by the gate. Only one left with someone in it. Other four walked away empty. I guess all but one got cured on that flight It was an MD88 so fairly small plane, not sure where it came from.
#116
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
With open seating the only rows that matter in this context are the exit rows.
I was thinking of this thread last night. I flew out of ATL on another airline and the inbound was late. There were five employees with wheelchairs by the gate. Only one left with someone in it. Other four walked away empty. I guess all but one got cured on that flight It was an MD88 so fairly small plane, not sure where it came from.
#117
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,513
Blocking helps assure "an adequate number of the seats used to provide the seating accommodations required by §382.81."
As elsewhere noted, a seat with a movable aisle armrest must be available for a passenger who uses an aisle chair on board.
That some pax meeting the criteria might take row 4 instead is beside the point.
Southwest's pre-boarding defies rationality. This time next year, look for a whole new policy.
As elsewhere noted, a seat with a movable aisle armrest must be available for a passenger who uses an aisle chair on board.
"You must not assign these seats to passengers who do not meet the criteria of §382.81 until 24 hours before the scheduled departure of the flight."
Southwest's pre-boarding defies rationality. This time next year, look for a whole new policy.
#118
Join Date: May 2016
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 62
There's a hidden latch at the back of many of the "immovable" aisle armrests that anyone can use to lift them up. It's usually on the bottom almost at the hinge, you can push it back (or whatever direction it moves) and it should release
#119
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Gold, WN A+ & CP, HH Diamond, Hyatt Platinum, National Executive Elite
Posts: 3,246
Blocking helps assure "an adequate number of the seats used to provide the seating accommodations required by §382.81."
As elsewhere noted, a seat with a movable aisle armrest must be available for a passenger who uses an aisle chair on board.
That some pax meeting the criteria might take row 4 instead is beside the point.
Southwest's pre-boarding defies rationality. This time next year, look for a whole new policy.
As elsewhere noted, a seat with a movable aisle armrest must be available for a passenger who uses an aisle chair on board.
That some pax meeting the criteria might take row 4 instead is beside the point.
Southwest's pre-boarding defies rationality. This time next year, look for a whole new policy.
The only way that WN will have a different preboard policy is if they go to assigned seating or apply to the DOT for a different method. I don't see either happening anytime soon but I've been wrong before.
#120
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,513
Otherwise, prepare for change late next year.