Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WN Emergency landing in Yuma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2011, 3:56 pm
  #76  
VIB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 478
Originally Posted by Out of my Element
So the roof opened up and the cabin depressurized and the pilots got the plane on the ground with no serious injuries?

I'd say the plane worked pretty well.
It certainly turned out better than the decompressions on the de Havilland Comets.
VIB is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 4:14 pm
  #77  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Posts: 3,796
It does look like the tear was confined to a single "bay" in the structure. The skin is bonded to stringers so that a tear will hit one of them, turn 90 degrees and form a flap that limits the size of the hole. This prevents a catastrophic destruction like the Aloha flight. In that case, corrosion and cracks caused the skin to separate from the stringers allowing the whole top of the aircraft to blow off.
alanh is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 4:58 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Island, NY and Boca Raton, FL
Programs: JetBlue TrueBlue, AAdvantage, Rapid Rewards, Sky Miles, SPG, Marriott Rewards, HHonors, Hertz
Posts: 2,275
I once heard a Southwest Airlines flight attendant say "Should there be a sudden change in cabin pressure, I would not have come to work today..." during the safety demo on a flight. I think it's time for this joke to be retired. On another note, job very well done to the pilots on WN812!
jetBlueNYFL is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 5:32 pm
  #79  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
And now there is confirmation the cause was (surprise) metal fatigue.

"Investigators said the rip began where two outer panels were riveted together, and that the area around it showed evidence of pre-existing cracking due to fatigue."

"We did find evidence of widespread cracking across this entire fracture surface," National Transportation Safety Board member Robert Sumwalt told reporters. Link to BBC article.

Originally Posted by TWA884
According to NPR, FAA maintenance records indicate at least eight instances of cracking in this aircraft's frame which were repaired in March 2010.
JDiver is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 8:49 pm
  #80  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/SMF/PDX/HNL
Programs: Hilton-lifetime diamond, Southwest A+, companion pass
Posts: 1,749
El Salvador? You have GOT to be kidding.

Member is requested to edit post to comply with this FT rule:
Posting Copyrighted Material
Information copyrighted or owned by any individual or entity other than the person posting should not be posted on the forums without the consent of the owner…If there is a news article or other piece of information you'd like to share from the web, credit the source of the information and/or give a brief two- to three- paragraph recap of the news and provide the appropriate link to the source.

Last edited by ftnoob; Apr 3, 2011 at 10:26 pm Reason: Copyrighted material rule
dlaue is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 10:04 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Programs: CX Diamond, AA EXP & 2M, SQ PPS, DL Diamond
Posts: 59
I'll offer a controversial statement. This is a step that Southwest is forced to take since their labor costs are no longer competitive to marketplace. Pilot salaries in particular are above today's curve.

Last edited by ftnoob; Apr 3, 2011 at 10:27 pm Reason: remove quoted deleted content
200nites is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 10:29 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,207
Originally Posted by 200nites
I'll offer a controversial statement. This is a step that Southwest is forced to take since their labor costs are no longer competitive to marketplace. Pilot salaries in particular are above today's curve.
As of last report (right after the $10MM fine that they got knocked down to $7.5MM) they had postponed the idea.

http://www.eturbonews.com/10002/flig...thwest-workers

"Dallas-based Southwest planned a year ago to send planes to El Salvador for maintenance work. It postponed the idea, however, after getting hit with $7.5 million in safety penalties for flying planes that hadn't been.. "
expert7700 is online now  
Old Apr 3, 2011, 10:29 pm
  #83  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,332
Here the CNN news:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/04/03...ex.html?hpt=T1

Might you want to read whole news article from CNN. Thanks Guys!
N830MH is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 8:22 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: HH Diamond, EX-AA Explat, WN Loyalist
Posts: 366
Thankfully, everyone will be OK and they are addressing the issues now. Those older planes are getting scary to fly in. The seats never stay up (always recline without pressing the button) and the other thing I have seen is TSA tape holding stuff up/together.

At least it got everyone's mind off being upset about 2.0...
leeinct is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 8:23 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Programs: DL DM & 5MM, WN
Posts: 1,451
Originally Posted by chiproos
Now I think the world of Southwest but have a hard time agreeing that 300+ flight cancellations and over 1000 flight delays constitutes "relatively few delays and cancellations."
With the AirTran merger supposedly growing the airline by one-fifth, then the threshold for "relatively few" will go up to at least 360 cancellations and 1200 delays. That should ease our concerns about customer service even more.
Justin026 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 8:25 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,185
Originally Posted by 200nites
Pilot salaries in particular are above today's curve.
So is their pilot productivity.
LarryJ is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 8:39 am
  #87  
Moderator, Southwest Airlines and Choice Privileges
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,039
Used to be true; now their pilot productivity is at or near the bottom by almost any measure.

Piloting WN flights is probably more demanding than average (more takeoffs and landings), so comparably experienced SWA pilots should earn more. Over time, however, WN flights have grown longer while their pilot and FA expenses have exploded. Whoever approved those contracts on management's side really hamstrung today's version of the company.
ftnoob is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 9:23 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Programs: WN F9 HA UA AA IHG HH MR
Posts: 3,305
Originally Posted by Justin026
With the AirTran merger supposedly growing the airline by one-fifth...
I think that concerns me more than anything from a safety standpoint - bringing the corporate culture of AirTran/ValueJet into Southwest. Critter 592 crash
Tanic is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 10:06 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Programs: DL DM & 5MM, WN
Posts: 1,451
Thank you, Brian for the information. But now I am concerned that that this test can be done on 60-odd planes in two days -- and that it hadn't already been done as a routine matter in the past.

Perhaps SWA can tell us about any other metal fatigue tests out in the market that can be done this quickly -- but that they have chosen not to do in the course of normal business.
Justin026 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2011, 10:10 am
  #90  
In Memoriam - Company Representative - Southwest Airlines
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: Southwest spokesperson
Posts: 1,201
Originally Posted by Justin026
Thank you, Brian for the information. But now I am concerned that that this test can be done on 60-odd planes in two days -- and that it hadn't already been done as a routine matter in the past.

Perhaps SWA can tell us about any other metal fatigue tests out in the market that can be done this quickly -- but that they have chosen not to do in the course of normal business.
Justin, the tests we are doing are in conjunction with the NTSB, FAA, and the Boeing Company.
SWABrian is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.