Last edit by: Q Shoe Guy
It is important that Air Canada has a clean and safe environment for their staff and passengers ! Please help Air Canada by posting your photos of dirty seating and cabin environments !
Post flight number !
Post seat number !
Fin number (aircraft number)!
Post flight number !
Post seat number !
Fin number (aircraft number)!
Dirty aircraft
#256
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
People should put in their flight details...or at the least the FIN. Leave out the seat # you're on if you don't want AC to have your information. Or post the FIN and seat # and not what date you were flying on and to/from locations.
#257
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West
Posts: 3,357
How would all this detail help in having planes clean. Its like telling the city sanitation department to pick the garbage in your neighborhood. I assume its done on a regular basis without you driving around finding the job not being done.
#258


Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 2,395
The fact that Customer Relations still haven't responded to a complaint from a SE100k traveling paid J after 4+ weeks doesn't give me a lot of confidence that they actually follow up on these sort of things though.
#259
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
For the pics I just posted, the flight was well over a month ago and details were submitted to AC, so not sure if the details are really relevant at this point. I'd submitted the comment to AC Customer Relations with the details right after the flight, so they have the necessary details if they want to do any corrective action (follow up with the groomers, schedule a deep clean for that aircraft).
The fact that Customer Relations still haven't responded to a complaint from a SE100k traveling paid J after 4+ weeks doesn't give me a lot of confidence that they actually follow up on these sort of things though.
The fact that Customer Relations still haven't responded to a complaint from a SE100k traveling paid J after 4+ weeks doesn't give me a lot of confidence that they actually follow up on these sort of things though.
Which is why a couple of us have posted photos and/or fin #s of the dirt, non-funcitoning water and/or items in need of repair. (Ben L did respond to one issue and indicated those aircraft were sent for deep grooming.)
However, I have been on more than one TATL 767 with serious dirt as well as other 767s with no water (twice).
I did not submit any report to AC.com customer relations as I was not optimistic that I would receive a reply.
#260
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
Public shaming has worked by doing this for AC aircraft on this forum.
#261
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West
Posts: 3,357
#262
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
Anyways, my point was...writing in doesn't do anything. They go unanswered as some posters have said. What other recourse do we have if we're flying AC to get on relatively clean planes? And AC/Ben has done something about the planes that were mentioned on here that were dirtier than a hooker's....home. Yes, let's go with that.
#264
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
How would all this detail help in having planes clean. Its like telling the city sanitation department to pick the garbage in your neighborhood. I assume its done on a regular basis without you driving around finding the job not being done.
For the pics I just posted, the flight was well over a month ago and details were submitted to AC, so not sure if the details are really relevant at this point. I'd submitted the comment to AC Customer Relations with the details right after the flight, so they have the necessary details if they want to do any corrective action (follow up with the groomers, schedule a deep clean for that aircraft).
Which is why a couple of us have posted photos and/or fin #s of the dirt, non-funcitoning water and/or items in need of repair. (Ben L did respond to one issue and indicated those aircraft were sent for deep grooming.)
However, I have been on more than one TATL 767 with serious dirt as well as other 767s with no water (twice).
However, I have been on more than one TATL 767 with serious dirt as well as other 767s with no water (twice).
To ol' Ben's defence, he actually takes it seriously. I think it really aggravates him to see these pictures. Unfortunately he can't oversee the cleaning of all AC planes.
This is where reporting Fins, dates, and locations can help.
If he sees 8 posts commenting on a particular aircraft type problem, he can address that specifically; it's easier to fix a specific problem versus a broad/general concern.
If he sees 8 posts about cleaning problems, and they all come from YYC, and they are all on aircraft at x part of the terminal around y time, then he can REALLY take care of business by directly targeting the managers/superintendents of the station.
A general complaint of the "clean you planes" type will most likely lead to a more informal and less 'impactful' internal reaction.
I really don't care about compensation, even if I think I could deserve one. The point is that it looks like when we inform AC of equipment/cleanliness deficiencies, the reaction is just a shrug and it gets ignored, signalling that AC most likely does not care.
The only redeeming part was Ben's reaction (which I really liked), but it's still not enough overall. He may have appeased me as an FT reader, but FT represents nothing but a grain of sand in the desert when compared to the whole customer base.
#265
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
I have sent a few emails to CR over the years. Either a pretty serious complaint (like a food allergy in a meal that wasn't supposed to have it), or to file my sincere thanks to awesome SD's. (amongst other things I won't repeat). I've always gotten a great response from his exec admin...usually always making a wrong right or a yes right-er
#266
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Really? Man you must really be a sparseflyer
I have sent a few emails to CR over the years. Either a pretty serious complaint (like a food allergy in a meal that wasn't supposed to have it), or to file my sincere thanks to awesome SD's. (amongst other things I won't repeat). I've always gotten a great response from his exec admin...usually always making a wrong right or a yes right-er 
I have sent a few emails to CR over the years. Either a pretty serious complaint (like a food allergy in a meal that wasn't supposed to have it), or to file my sincere thanks to awesome SD's. (amongst other things I won't repeat). I've always gotten a great response from his exec admin...usually always making a wrong right or a yes right-er 
I never emailed CR directly though (and I would expect them to about an serious allergy concern), but maybe I should lol
I used the online forms etc...
#267
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
#268
Flying Blue Director


Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Posts: 1,983
To ol' Ben's defence, he actually takes it seriously. I think it really aggravates him to see these pictures. Unfortunately he can't oversee the cleaning of all AC planes.
This is where reporting Fins, dates, and locations can help.
If he sees 8 posts commenting on a particular aircraft type problem, he can address that specifically; it's easier to fix a specific problem versus a broad/general concern.
If he sees 8 posts about cleaning problems, and they all come from YYC, and they are all on aircraft at x part of the terminal around y time, then he can REALLY take care of business by directly targeting the managers/superintendents of the station.
A general complaint of the "clean you planes" type will most likely lead to a more informal and less 'impactful' internal reaction.
This however is what makes AC and AC management look REALLY bad. I actually joined this forum because I was wondering how to address complaints on equipment, and CR never replied.
I really don't care about compensation, even if I think I could deserve one. The point is that it looks like when we inform AC of equipment/cleanliness deficiencies, the reaction is just a shrug and it gets ignored, signalling that AC most likely does not care.
The only redeeming part was Ben's reaction (which I really liked), but it's still not enough overall. He may have appeased me as an FT reader, but FT represents nothing but a grain of sand in the desert when compared to the whole customer base.
This is where reporting Fins, dates, and locations can help.
If he sees 8 posts commenting on a particular aircraft type problem, he can address that specifically; it's easier to fix a specific problem versus a broad/general concern.
If he sees 8 posts about cleaning problems, and they all come from YYC, and they are all on aircraft at x part of the terminal around y time, then he can REALLY take care of business by directly targeting the managers/superintendents of the station.
A general complaint of the "clean you planes" type will most likely lead to a more informal and less 'impactful' internal reaction.
This however is what makes AC and AC management look REALLY bad. I actually joined this forum because I was wondering how to address complaints on equipment, and CR never replied.
I really don't care about compensation, even if I think I could deserve one. The point is that it looks like when we inform AC of equipment/cleanliness deficiencies, the reaction is just a shrug and it gets ignored, signalling that AC most likely does not care.
The only redeeming part was Ben's reaction (which I really liked), but it's still not enough overall. He may have appeased me as an FT reader, but FT represents nothing but a grain of sand in the desert when compared to the whole customer base.
#269
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,153
Thanks SparseFlyer. I really do take this as an affront against our aircraft cleanliness, and rightfully so. It is a problem we need to address, and I can only tell you this thread has made its rounds internally - there is a significant effort underway to increase the attention to this kind of detail. As much as I hate to see it, you're right in that posting pictures/details with FIN or flight/date really does help as we can target those aircraft specifically needing attention.
How about: if you find a dirty aircraft, please do post the details. your reward is a 20 percent off voucher.
Kind of crazy to expect passengers to do your Quality Control.
Can't the 8-10 FA's do some visual inspection instead of congregating in the galley for hours of chit chat?
#270
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
Thanks SparseFlyer. I really do take this as an affront against our aircraft cleanliness, and rightfully so. It is a problem we need to address, and I can only tell you this thread has made its rounds internally - there is a significant effort underway to increase the attention to this kind of detail. As much as I hate to see it, you're right in that posting pictures/details with FIN or flight/date really does help as we can target those aircraft specifically needing attention.
So I'm half joking when I say the following fins need it most

731-747
701-706
640-685
931-938
I also appreciate those posting photos as they are a bit entertaining but I'm wondering what the real value is in having 1/42 J seats cleaned when reported etc. And if the entire plane is then scheduled for a deep clean if we were to report a seat, why aren't all aircraft automatically scheduled... and if they are, it is probably time to hold managers/supervisors of aircraft grooming teams responsible. On a less-than-busy-day, maybe you can rush onboard after the aircraft is groomed and right before boarding so you can see for yourself/discipline as necessary
(or as Allvest says, have SDs/FAs do it). And if they too fail in QC, well... back to my Ben L plan lol




