Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SOP discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 7:38 am
  #526  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by ehasbrouck
No new comments have been approved and there are no new posts on the TSA blog since Thursday afternoon. Might this mean that some of the same people are responsible for deciding which comments to approve and deciding what to redact in other TSA postings (like the SOP on fbo.gov), and that one or more of the comment-censors are among those getting an extra-long paid holiday of administrative leave?
I have no information, of course, so this is purely speculative. But I think another, less nefarious scenario may be likely.

We certainly know that Bob has other duties besides the blog ... and that those duties usually take priority over blog maintenance. We know that several TSA folks have been placed on administrative leave; their work has to be covered by someone else. It may be the case that Bob is being pressed into other duties that have a higher priority (from a TSA perspective) than the blog.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 8:13 am
  #527  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
SOP problem cited in article

This WSJ article discusses the Obama administration looking at a centralized policy on controlled/sensitive, yet unclassified, documents.
DevilDog438 is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 9:56 am
  #528  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
I have no information, of course, so this is purely speculative. But I think another, less nefarious scenario may be likely.

We certainly know that Bob has other duties besides the blog ... and that those duties usually take priority over blog maintenance. We know that several TSA folks have been placed on administrative leave; their work has to be covered by someone else. It may be the case that Bob is being pressed into other duties that have a higher priority (from a TSA perspective) than the blog.
I would like to think that but I think it has more to do with cooling us off in hopes we forget about it.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 11:42 am
  #529  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco, USA
Posts: 79
Comments appearing on TSA blog again

Interestingly, as soon as I posted my comment above, a bunch of newly-approved comments appeared on the TSA blog. I guess someone is eager for us to know that they are still on the job...
ehasbrouck is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 12:50 pm
  #530  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
I would like to think that but I think it has more to do with cooling us off in hopes we forget about it.
It doesn't take someone reading the blog long to realize that ain't gonna happen ...

As I said, I think more innocent explanations are more likely. It's easy to see conspiracies everywhere, when sometimes, things just happen.

Anyways ... the blog seems to be moving again ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 1:54 pm
  #531  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by ehasbrouck
Interestingly, as soon as I posted my comment above, a bunch of newly-approved comments appeared on the TSA blog. I guess someone is eager for us to know that they are still on the job...
You are the puppet master making them dance.
oldjonesy is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 3:46 pm
  #532  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco, USA
Posts: 79
TSA gives itself more time to respond to follow-up FOIA request

The TSA has acknowledged the Identity Project FOIA request for additional information about its procedures, but has given itself an extension of time and has denied our request for a waiver of fees on the boilerplate grounds -- clearly inappropriate in this case -- that this information doesn't concern government operations, that disclosure of these procedures isn't likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of government operations or activities, and that the interest of the Identity Project (which the TSA admits is a media organization, and which is a project of a tax-exempt non-profit educational and charitable organization) is primarily commercial.
ehasbrouck is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 4:11 pm
  #533  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
There are going to be hearings held tomorrow afternoon by the House Homeland Security Committee. I am going to be in DC and expect to be in attendance. I am not testifying but I'm hoping to meet a couple folks in person that I've had contact with over the past couple weeks. Should be interesting to see how that plays out.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 4:34 pm
  #534  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by ehasbrouck
The TSA has acknowledged the Identity Project FOIA request for additional information about its procedures, but has given itself an extension of time and has denied our request for a waiver of fees on the boilerplate grounds -- clearly inappropriate in this case -- that this information doesn't concern government operations, that disclosure of these procedures isn't likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of government operations or activities, and that the interest of the Identity Project (which the TSA admits is a media organization, and which is a project of a tax-exempt non-profit educational and charitable organization) is primarily commercial.
I think I got the same letter as you.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 4:37 pm
  #535  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Marriott Plat
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by sbm12
There are going to be hearings held tomorrow afternoon by the House Homeland Security Committee. I am going to be in DC and expect to be in attendance. I am not testifying but I'm hoping to meet a couple folks in person that I've had contact with over the past couple weeks. Should be interesting to see how that plays out.
Gale is testifying. Looks like she's coming out of the bunker!
amejr999 is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 4:47 pm
  #536  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by amejr999
Gale is testifying. Looks like she's coming out of the bunker!
I wonder how many lies she will tell. I wish I were a drinker, I would be able to get skunked if I drank every time she lied.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 4:56 pm
  #537  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
I wonder how many lies she will tell. I wish I were a drinker, I would be able to get skunked if I drank every time she lied.
Too bad I'm flying down...I could bring a flask and drink during the session.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 9:01 pm
  #538  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,917
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
I wonder how many lies she will tell. I wish I were a drinker, I would be able to get skunked if I drank every time she lied.
I'll take the hits for ya. Just want to do my part, don't ya know.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 12:18 am
  #539  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 17,985
Originally Posted by sbm12
There are going to be hearings held tomorrow afternoon by the House Homeland Security Committee. I am going to be in DC and expect to be in attendance. I am not testifying but I'm hoping to meet a couple folks in person that I've had contact with over the past couple weeks. Should be interesting to see how that plays out.
Bring a lawyer. Nobody should appear before Congress without one (assuming you are called).

Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
At least we now know that there are about 300 DHS employees who have actually seen and maybe even read the SOP document.
+1
Boraxo is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 4:52 am
  #540  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by sbm12
For the most part, yes.

As for who's looking where, I enjoy this snapshot.



A few of there mere even interested enough to click on an advert or three.
I put the analytic tool on my site, yesterday I had 11 visitors from DHS. 5 visitors were direct, 4 were from FT and 2 from Google.

I wonder how many more visits I will get now that I am taking anonymous TSA insider tips.
Trollkiller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.