Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SOP discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 7:20 pm
  #601  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by N965VJ
I like the links in that ABC News has in the center of every story they publish on this:





Poor Gale looks like she could use some Rolaids.
http://p1.hotornot.com/bl/brands/OMK...EGDXFUFUMK.jpg
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 7:38 pm
  #602  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by marklyon
CSPAN will sell you a capture of the CC feed for a nominal fee.
I did not know that, thanks for the info. ^
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 8:02 pm
  #603  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
"I can imagine how much fun the retards at FlyerTalk are having with this. I suggest that those of us who are TSA employees not add any details to those discussions. Let 'em speculate, pontificate and mentally masturbate."
A comment from another blog by a member who has posted here. Of course they have a little habit of deleting their post after getting pi$$ed off.

This is an example of how some TSA employees see the public.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 6:07 am
  #604  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by marklyon
CSPAN will sell you a capture of the CC feed for a nominal fee.
The video is still up on the House Homeland Security web site. Click on the "Hearings" tab. If you have video capture software, you might be able to pull it down today and save it. The file extension on the video stream is .wvx.

Testimony Video Stream
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 6:15 am
  #605  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
A comment from another blog by a member who has posted here. Of course they have a little habit of deleting their post after getting pi$$ed off.

"I can imagine how much fun the retards at FlyerTalk are having with this. I suggest that those of us who are TSA employees not add any details to those discussions. Let 'em speculate, pontificate and mentally masturbate."
This is an example of how some TSA employees see the public.
Interesting that he used the term "pontificate" 'cause that's what he used to do here.
doober is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 6:34 am
  #606  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
The video is still up on the House Homeland Security web site. Click on the "Hearings" tab. If you have video capture software, you might be able to pull it down today and save it. The file extension on the video stream is .wvx.

Testimony Video Stream
I'm making a capture now (I think - I'll know soon if it worked). Check out Rep. Dent's comments starting around 16:40 in that recording. That will be the subject of today's post.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:01 am
  #607  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
I've managed to capture the feed and extract the 27 seconds of lunacy that Rep. Dent (R-PA) shares about his view of me and others hosting the document.
http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...a-congressman/

In short, Congressman Dent, had you showed any glimmer of ability to actually hold the Agency accountable I might have considered your request. But you can't and until you or someone else does I'll take my fight to the streets where people actually seem to respond.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 12:42 pm
  #608  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco, USA
Posts: 79
"TSA's 12 other SOPs"

The identity Project has filed a follow-up FOIA request for the 12 other SOPs mentioned by Ms. Rossides in her testimony, for all SOPs regardless of number, and for the list and index of all SOPs.
ehasbrouck is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 1:31 pm
  #609  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by ehasbrouck
The identity Project has filed a follow-up FOIA request for the 12 other SOPs mentioned by Ms. Rossides in her testimony, for all SOPs regardless of number, and for the list and index of all SOPs.
If you get the request fulfilled be sure to share.

I placed a new post on my blog, I wanted to a complete overview but got stuck on one quote. I think I will need a bigger blog.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 1:39 pm
  #610  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
A comment from another blog by a member who has posted here. Of course they have a little habit of deleting their post after getting pi$$ed off.

This is an example of how some TSA employees see the public.
Yup, with disdain.

Originally Posted by doober
Interesting that he used the term "pontificate" 'cause that's what he used to do here.
Who is it?

Originally Posted by ehasbrouck
The identity Project has filed a follow-up FOIA request for the 12 other SOPs mentioned by Ms. Rossides in her testimony, for all SOPs regardless of number, and for the list and index of all SOPs.
What a waste of time. They will just respond that it is SSI and that it is therefore exempt from FOIA.
Ari is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 2:43 pm
  #611  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
If you get the request fulfilled be sure to share.
If I read it right the Identity Project states that they fully intend to release any documents they receive to the public.

I would like more transparency from TSA but I do think there are things they need to keep to themselves.

A goal that is actually winable would seem to make more sense.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 3:08 pm
  #612  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
If I read it right the Identity Project states that they fully intend to release any documents they receive to the public.
Ummm...once the TSA lets the docs out of their control they MUST assume that they are public. That's the whole point of FOIA requests. It isn't like one can suggest that they are going to request a document but not show it to anyone else and somehow that would change the response of the FOIA officer.

In this case I'm betting that they are shot down wholesale. It will suck but it is par for the course with the TSA. Unless the IDP guys have a lot of cash and some decent attorneys they'll get nowhere.

The appropriate response from the TSA would be to properly redact the documents and release them in a timely manner. They properly redacted the previously requested one for the IDP and there were no issues with that. Rossides has gone WAY over the top in reacting to this incident, prohibiting access that is statutorily guaranteed (e.g. the Congressional requests). She's essentially blocked even legitimate requests "out of an abundance of caution." Think of the .

Last edited by sbm12; Dec 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 3:54 pm
  #613  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Originally Posted by sbm12
Ummm...once the TSA lets the docs out of their control they MUST assume that they are public........ ). She's essentially blocked even legitimate requests "out of an abundance of caution." Think of the .
I understand the point but why ask for wholesale release when the odds are better that it wil snow in He--.

Ask for something that is reasonable then fight them on the grounds of trying to hide information that is of no threat to their operation.

If IDP gets anything I'm betting the blackspace will overtake the whitespace by a good margin. No words will be left!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 3:54 pm
  #614  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by sbm12
The appropriate response from the TSA would be to properly redact the documents and release them in a timely manner. They properly redacted the previously requested one for the IDP and there were no issues with that. Rossides has gone WAY over the top in reacting to this incident, prohibiting access that is statutorily guaranteed (e.g. the Congressional requests). She's essentially blocked even legitimate requests "out of an abundance of caution." Think of the .
Bingo. Why don't they just drop a subponea duces tecum on the agency and then hold her in contempt if she doesn't comply? What's with this hands off approach?
Ari is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 4:47 pm
  #615  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 221
Rep. Dent's directing everyone to the "whistleblower process"

"To those who repost this security information on the internet you should share in the blame should security be breached as a result of this disclosure. In the future I would ask that you please, please use the whistleblower process congress has created for you. Call the department. call the inspector general. Call congress and its committees. But please do not circulate sensitive security documents. Rest assured that we will hold the department to account."


Rep. Dent did not get this issue of the Washington Post:

http://bit.ly/87lIO

...nor this one from the Washington Times:

http://bit.ly/1cW00n

How coincidental the screwed whistleblowers are all TSA law enforcement officers and one of their managers.

Your recent articles about the hearing were spot-on. OUTSTANDING work Seth!!!
willpolice4food is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.