Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Qatar Airways | Privilege Club
Reload this Page >

No more Al Mourjan access for upgrades with Qmiles/QCredits

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No more Al Mourjan access for upgrades with Qmiles/QCredits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2017, 5:49 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: EWR
Programs: CX Green | UA Silver | Marriott Lifetime Platinum | Hyatt Globalist | Hilton Gold | AA EXP
Posts: 813
The cynic in me thinks QR is trying to 'encourage' its members to purchase access to AM. If this is truly the reason however, it would've been better had QR simply tag an 'express' processing fee for upgrade on departure (equivalent to AM access fee). Yes, people will be upset but the experience will stay the same. This approach of denying AM access for upgrade on departure feels cheap

The other me thinks QR is trying to reduce lounge overcrowding during peak transfer time. I mean if QR continues to add flights (and there's no reason to think it won't), it will need to either expand AM/build AM2 or reduce the number of passengers that have access. I wonder if this also means that AM2 by the north node will not be ready anytime soon ...

Last edited by Rivarix; Nov 8, 2017 at 7:10 pm
Rivarix is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2017, 6:07 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: BKK
Programs: QR Platinum
Posts: 159
So i assume this does apply also to Al Safwa...
What about outstation lounges ?
SENNINHA is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 2:42 pm
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by SENNINHA
So i assume this does apply also to Al Safwa...
What about outstation lounges ?
Just had this discussion at the entrace of al Safwa:
Me: "So I heard you don't let in upgrades any more? Does that apply to non-airport upgrades as well, and those done before the policy change?"
Staff: "yes, sorry"
Me: "You know I booked this beforehand... (I decided that instead of explaining it, I figured I'd just test the rule) why don't you scan my BP and check?"
Staff: *scans BP* "Oh, ok, it says you can get in. Go ahead, but check at reception"

And they scanned by BP at reception, and here I am now..
SENNINHA likes this.

Last edited by mpkz; Nov 10, 2017 at 2:51 pm
mpkz is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 2:50 pm
  #34  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by Rivarix
The cynic in me thinks QR is trying to 'encourage' its members to purchase access to AM. If this is truly the reason however, it would've been better had QR simply tag an 'express' processing fee for upgrade on departure (equivalent to AM access fee). Yes, people will be upset but the experience will stay the same. This approach of denying AM access for upgrade on departure feels cheap

The other me thinks QR is trying to reduce lounge overcrowding during peak transfer time. I mean if QR continues to add flights (and there's no reason to think it won't), it will need to either expand AM/build AM2 or reduce the number of passengers that have access. I wonder if this also means that AM2 by the north node will not be ready anytime soon ...
You want to see overcrowding, check out the biz lounge during peak hours... AM is a haven of tranquility in comparison
mpkz is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 4:36 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Programs: AA Platinum Pro, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 75
Well this news does stink. I've done quite a few upgrades on departure, it's been sort of a fun game for me - felt like winning the lottery especially when the upgrade was granted with a long layover and you then got to walk out of the status lounges to the AM.

Personally affects me less these days as am flying more paid business but I don't think it's good policy - QR have been so stuck on their premium lounges being based on 'cabin flown' (while effectively 'ignoring' platinums flying economy), they should really still honour it if you do bag an upgrade, I really can't get my head round why booked in advance vs upgrade at the airport should be any different especially for high status pax.
​​
Kwanger is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 6:20 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
Originally Posted by Kwanger
I really can't get my head round why booked in advance vs upgrade at the airport should be any different especially for high status pax.​​
Agreed. Especially since, as I said above, those who upgrade an hour or two before departure will have very limited, if any, time to visit a lounge.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 9:14 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Programs: QR Platinum
Posts: 470
Originally Posted by mpkz
at the entrace of al Safwa:
Me: "So I heard you don't let in upgrades any more? Does that apply to non-airport upgrades as well, and those done before the policy change?"
Staff: "yes, sorry"
.
Do i understand correct, that there is no more Al Safwa access if i booked the upgrade by miles in advance (not at the airport)?
Crisu69 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 10:21 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
Originally Posted by Crisu69
Do i understand correct, that there is no more Al Safwa access if i booked the upgrade by miles in advance (not at the airport)?
Apparently the rules say no access; but at least one experience suggests otherwise. I would say go to the base of the escalator and let the staffer scan your BP.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 11:01 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 795
Originally Posted by Crisu69
Do i understand correct, that there is no more Al Safwa access if i booked the upgrade by miles in advance (not at the airport)?
These changes to lounge entitlement apply to upgrade on departure, as per the QR notification included upthread. Upgrades in advance retain the upgraded lounge access, and someone else upthread has had this confirmed by CS
Johnnieboy is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2017, 11:34 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Posts: 9,456
This makes any heavy flyer in Y (quite a few of those exists) even more picking EK (and EY) over QR.
YuropFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2017, 1:42 am
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
Originally Posted by Johnnieboy
These changes to lounge entitlement apply to upgrade on departure, as per the QR notification included upthread. Upgrades in advance retain the upgraded lounge access, and someone else upthread has had this confirmed by CS
I think that it's far from clear at this point.

Originally Posted by mpkz
Just had this discussion at the entrace of al Safwa:
Me: "So I heard you don't let in upgrades any more? Does that apply to non-airport upgrades as well, and those done before the policy change?"
Staff: "yes, sorry" ...

And they scanned by BP at reception, and here I am now..
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2017, 2:44 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 795
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
I think that it's far from clear at this point.
I appreciate that there is some confusion, but the QR notifications quoted at the top of the thread specify upgrade on departure. The FT'er that went to Al Safwa asked if it applied to their pre-upgraded ticket, the escalator agent thought it did but the computer said they were fine and let them in. That particular incident looks like it was probably confusion on the part of the agent.

The important distinction in the latest t&c's is that lounge access and baggage allowance is as per ticketed cabin. Upgrading at the airport does not result in the issue of a new ticket for the upgraded cabin. Upgrading in advance however does result in a new ticket being issued, and this is what gives the passenger the advantages of the new cabin class. That's not to say this won't change in the future, but it doesn't appear to be part of this latest upgrade on departure "enhancement"
Johnnieboy is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2017, 3:35 am
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,764
Originally Posted by Johnnieboy
I appreciate that there is some confusion, but the QR notifications quoted at the top of the thread specify upgrade on departure. The FT'er that went to Al Safwa asked if it applied to their pre-upgraded ticket, the escalator agent thought it did but the computer said they were fine and let them in. That particular incident looks like it was probably confusion on the part of the agent.
If the agent was confused, it's irrelevant anyway. Agent asked the system by scanning the boarding pass, and system said admission to Al Safwa OK. The agent didn't make that determination, the boarding pass scanner (and whatever is behind it) did.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2017, 7:49 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (OW Emerald) & Jet Airways - Thank goodness i never got started.......most awful FF program
Posts: 2,385
Going off slightly on a tangent but really irks me is the fact that OW status counts for zilch even when you have paid J tickets.

I get that they want to protect revenue and want to keep out the so called rifraff from Y but why restrict OWE from al safwa when flying on a paid J ticket.

......and controversially, I don't think much of the Al Mourjan. Yes it's aeshetically pleasing but food and beverage leave a lot to be desired (and a decent sandwich deli foes not make up for other shortcomings).

I much prefer the London Lounge.
d3vski is offline  
Old Nov 11, 2017, 8:34 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,944
d3vski Al Mourjan has always been limited to J and f passengers. There have been a couple of periods when OWE and OWS were admitted when the Business and First class lounges were closed for other use/refurbishment.
OWS and OWE still count for access to those two lounges even if you are travelling in F! But I think that given the vast difference between those two lounges and Al Mourjan, and Al Safwa, it would be rather silly to use them.
With the new access rules they will now play an even bigger role.
remdk is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.