Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 11, 2015, 11:49 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: drewguy
If you've never gone through this process read this before posting!
Note: Please consider that with high probability, United is monitoring this thread, so please pay attention on what you post!

DOT Investigation UpdatesNews Media Updates:

-------

According to USA Today, Ben Mutzabaugh:
United is voiding the bookings of several thousand individuals who were attempting to take advantage of an error a third-party software provider made when it applied an incorrect currency exchange rate, despite United having properly filed its fares. Most of these bookings were for travel originating in the United Kingdom, and the level of bookings made with Danish Kroner as the local currency was significantly higher than normal during the limited period that customers made these bookings.
Note that United has also accidentally cancelled "legitimate" tickets paid for in USD, purchased in USD from LHR... Please check your other tickets if purchased today to ensure they were not unilaterally cancelled.

However, there is no chance at all that you can have your tickets re-instated if you complain to DOT on the basis of DOT rule § 399.88:
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.
Form for filing DOT complaint. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.

Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.


Tips for DOT Complaint:
  • File on DOT for every ticket number affected.
  • If you have one reservation with four people traveling (four tickets) file 4 DOT complaints, one per ticket.
  • If you have separate reservations, file a DOT complaint for each.
  • The DOT complaint website may take several minutes to load, depending on demand.
  • When you go to upload a file, be careful as it will reset all your radio buttons. So, if you want a copy of the complaint, make sure you double check that "Yes" is still selected before submitting, especially if you upload a file.

Template For Complaint:
United has unilaterally cancelled my ticket without my consent.

Facts:
1. The ticket was ticketed (had a ticket number).
2. I received a confirmation number, ticket number, and emails stating both
3. The ticket was paid for and my credit card charged.

United must reinstate the ticket within its original cabin. This trip is for travel TO the United States.

At no time during the booking process was any other fare than the Danish Krone equivalent displayed. As a reasonable, prudent consumer, I believed I was paying the price displayed to me on the website. United never sent or displayed the equivalent fare in any other currency.

Trip Details
Ticket #: 016XXXXXXXXXX
PNR: XXXXXX
Routing: LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL

Attachments: Attached is a document showing the ticket, routing, and providing proof that the reservation was ticketed.

Filename: Cancelled - UA Reservation - LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL - XXXXXX - 016XXXXXXXXXX.pdf

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant Law |
| http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/399.88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant FAQ |
| http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/rules/EAPP_2_FAQ.pdf |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Does the prohibition on post-purchase price increases in section 399.88(a) apply in the situation where a carrier mistakenly offers an airfare due to a computer problem or human error and a consumer purchases the ticket at that fare before the carrier is able to fix the mistake?

Section 399.88(a) states that it is an unfair and deceptive practice for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, or of a tour or tour component that includes scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation to a consumer after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of a government-imposed tax or fee and only if the passenger is advised of a possible increase before purchasing a ticket. A purchase occurs when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer. Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a “mistake.”
-----
Tips for retrieving your ticket number:
  1. paste(right click copy link location first) following link into your web browser
  2. change XXXXXX next to COPNR= for your reservation number and LASTNAME next to LN= for you SURNAME
  3. go to the webpage address you have just created

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...NRCD=2/11/2015


Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX View Post
R E L A X

Breathe deep.

Congrats on all who got in.

Now comes the fun part.

1. Discovery - mistake fare is posted on FT. Novices frantically checks how much vacation time they have and if the dates of availability mesh with their schedules. Experienced FTers just book it and worry about contacting spouses or their boss later. Word spreads like wildfire.

2. Excitement - Tickets purchased, confirmation emails received and dates of travel shared with other FTers. Discussions of what to see and do and where to stay crop up in other threads. Novices contact source to change seats or inquire about upgrades, Seasoned FTers sit back and enjoy reading the discussion threads.

3. Stress Stage 1 - Concern over paper ticket delivery - Novices Frantically check otheFedEx website every few hours, constant monitoring of driveway for FedEx truck. Seasoned FT veterans sit back and relax.

4. Glee and happiness - Paper tickets in hand, vacation request submitted, spouses finally informed, hotel reservations made and bragging to friends and co-workers begins. Both novices and experts get very excited.

5. Stress Stage 2 - Rumors of fare not being honored, discussion threads about the airline and ticketing agency ensue. Rumors crop up like crabgrass at this stage. Many FTers begin to worry excessively about whether or not the trip will happen. Novices make non-refundable and financial committments to their trip. Seasoned FTers make mixed drinks (and maybe a sandwich) and is patient.

6. Reality Check - Accurate information is obtained - usually takes place a week to 10 days after mistake fare is published. Confirmed information from the source as to whether or not tickets will be honored.

7a. Pure Joy (Icelandair style- Fare is Honored) - Lots of happy people, FT threads on shared information regarding hotels, restaurants, tours, etc. Jealousy from others sets in. First "FT guinea pigs" embark, post confirmation threads that all is ok.


7b Hostile Feelings (Copa Airlines Style - fare is not honored) - Many angry and disappointed FTers. Refunds are issued. Novices have multiple discussion threads of lawsuits and hostile correspondence, FT pros mutter "c'est la vie" and look for the next fare mistake.

8a Success (Honored) - Trip Report thread becomes very active


Freedom of Information Act Request
File #2015-147, Office of the Secretary of Transportation - Receipt acknowledged 3/13/15

http://www.dot.gov/individuals/foia/office-secretary-foia-information

Relevant excerpt from my request on 2/24/15. There no need for multiple requests for the same thing, though feel free to request more or different information obviously. I'll post any updates as I get them.

"Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S. C. subsection 552, I am requesting access to any and all records of correspondence, including electronic, between anyone working for, or on the behalf of, United Airlines and its subsidiaries, and with anyone working for, or on the behalf of, the Department of Transportation; specifically this would include only the date range beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015.

In addition, I am requesting access to any and all internal records and correspondence in relation to coming to the decision made on February 23rd, 2015 regarding the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings Determination Regarding United Airlines Mistaken Fare, with the exception of any of the consumer submitted complaints via phone, email, website, or letter. Specifically, this would be any records beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015."
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:36 am
  #3871  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,006
Originally Posted by Deltahater
Why don't you stop repeating yourself? You made your point, which you are entitled to. Saying it 2-3 time is, like you said, "just crap". Add something new to the conversation.
I did 5 post in this thread while you probably did more than 50 just tying to defend your case, always along the same line... And any time someone makes you aware that there might be a different point of view, here it goes the bashing.

If saying 2-3 times is crap (I never said that though), how about saying it 50? It's clear to us you were in Denmark, ehm no, you weren't but still that doesn't matter, right? You repeated that so many times we believe you now.
maclover is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:51 am
  #3872  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Originally Posted by T8191
And some are 7-digit, to add an extra level of confusion.
I used to live in "AB12 3CD"
Me too!

(Though to avoid the suggestion of cohabitation, mine was WX12 3YZ)



Currently under a spartan 5-digit code: P1 2QR
IAN-UK is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:52 am
  #3873  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,804
Any idea when we can expect a final decision from DOT?
I booked a trip for the whole family, and want to go ahead and book new tickets (not on United), but first want to be sure that those United tickets have no chance (clinging to hope)
ELAL is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:55 am
  #3874  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 640
Has anyone complained to the CAA?
If so, got a template?

I'm refering to the wiki:
"Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected."
fuyao is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:56 am
  #3875  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by maclover
I really can't stand this behaviour anymore and I urge moderators to step in.
Everyone who thinks UA shouldn't honor these ticket is being repeatedly accused of being:
- UA employee
- on UA payroll
- a troll
- saying just crap

and so on.

FT has always been a place where to discuss. Seems few people want it to be the place where they can only defend their position without giving anyone else the opportunity to express own point of view.
also to add, it's difficult to get a neutral point of view in this discussion because many people here are "invested" in this case, those who aren't may be bitter, there are just a lot of emotions associated with united. but after taking a step back to review both sides have great arguments but with my luck United won't honor them
htran88 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 7:59 am
  #3876  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,859
Originally Posted by Jesperss
United should just send refund checks to everyone's billing address they used on the reservation.

That would be fair, right?
I would consider it fair if they sent a paper ticket to that address.

Originally Posted by fuyao
Has anyone complained to the CAA?
If so, got a template?

I'm refering to the wiki:
"Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected."
There's a online form you can fill and submit, not much different then DOT.
Lack is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:00 am
  #3877  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FRA/MUC/NUE
Programs: M&M SEN, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 315
Originally Posted by pacys95
The Charges fell off my CC
Were they actually charged or just pending?

Mine were charged and I have not received any pay back yet.
FlyingLasse is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:01 am
  #3878  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,898
Originally Posted by maclover
I did 5 post in this thread while you probably did more than 50 just tying to defend your case, always along the same line... And any time someone makes you aware that there might be a different point of view, here it goes the bashing.

If saying 2-3 times is crap (I never said that though), how about saying it 50? It's clear to us you were in Denmark, ehm no, you weren't but still that doesn't matter, right? You repeated that so many times we believe you now.
Please quote where I claimed that I was in or even near Denmark.
This is why you have no credibility on this board. You just make stuff up.
I respect that some people believe that UA should not be forced to honor the tickets. No problem.
The issue arises when people ignore the rule 399.88, invent rules about credit card mailing addresses or (country of residence like our good friend Michael Sasso from Bloomberg), or simply make up crap to further their point.

But please address this point:

ITA and several airlines had the same "glitch". Other airlines had safeguards in place to prevent tickets from being issued. UA did not.
This tells me that there are ways to stop the glitch from leading to tickets being issued. It also tells me that UA either decided to not put in the safeguards or they forgot.
When you make bad decisions, there should be consequences.
Why should UA, who has a loooong history of bad IT, not finally be held responsible for their failures? Unless UA experiences a substantial financial hit, they will never wake up and build a reliable, dependable website that provides true, accurate travel information.
Deltahater is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:03 am
  #3879  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FRA/MUC/NUE
Programs: M&M SEN, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 315
Completely with you, Deltahater!
FlyingLasse is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:03 am
  #3880  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 16
Originally Posted by FlyingLasse
Were they actually charged or just pending?

Mine were charged and I have not received any pay back yet.
by me they were just pending, and they finally fell off
pacys95 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:12 am
  #3881  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 33
I wonder if lowering the prices for round-trip between Milan and Philadelphia with a stop-over in Toronto for €350 (or $399) is a clever strategy from United...
constituo is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:13 am
  #3882  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,433
Originally Posted by pacys95
by me they were just pending, and they finally fell off
Same here but I took a screen shot of the page when they were pending. Don't know if I'll ever need it but figured I'd just add that to all my other documentation.
cruisr is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:17 am
  #3883  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: LA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold, Delta Platinum Medallion, AAdvantage Platinum Pro
Posts: 600
Has anyone else noticed that with all this talk of United, that all of the ads being displayed are for the MP credit card?

If anything, FT is making a killing on ad exposures, and that money is coming from United's advertising budget!
Miami305 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:18 am
  #3884  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,433
Originally Posted by Miami305
Has anyone else noticed that with all this talk of United, that all of the ads being displayed are for the MP credit card?

If anything, FT is making a killing on ad exposures, and that money is coming from United's advertising budget!
Yeah I noticed that too and thought it pretty ironic.
cruisr is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 8:24 am
  #3885  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: TK Elite Plus, SAS EBG, QR Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,297
Originally Posted by cruisr
Same here but I took a screen shot of the page when they were pending. Don't know if I'll ever need it but figured I'd just add that to all my other documentation.
Mine haven't been dropped yet.
LH4116 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.