Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 11, 2015, 11:49 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: drewguy
If you've never gone through this process read this before posting!
Note: Please consider that with high probability, United is monitoring this thread, so please pay attention on what you post!

DOT Investigation UpdatesNews Media Updates:

-------

According to USA Today, Ben Mutzabaugh:
United is voiding the bookings of several thousand individuals who were attempting to take advantage of an error a third-party software provider made when it applied an incorrect currency exchange rate, despite United having properly filed its fares. Most of these bookings were for travel originating in the United Kingdom, and the level of bookings made with Danish Kroner as the local currency was significantly higher than normal during the limited period that customers made these bookings.
Note that United has also accidentally cancelled "legitimate" tickets paid for in USD, purchased in USD from LHR... Please check your other tickets if purchased today to ensure they were not unilaterally cancelled.

However, there is no chance at all that you can have your tickets re-instated if you complain to DOT on the basis of DOT rule § 399.88:
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.
Form for filing DOT complaint. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.

Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.


Tips for DOT Complaint:
  • File on DOT for every ticket number affected.
  • If you have one reservation with four people traveling (four tickets) file 4 DOT complaints, one per ticket.
  • If you have separate reservations, file a DOT complaint for each.
  • The DOT complaint website may take several minutes to load, depending on demand.
  • When you go to upload a file, be careful as it will reset all your radio buttons. So, if you want a copy of the complaint, make sure you double check that "Yes" is still selected before submitting, especially if you upload a file.

Template For Complaint:
United has unilaterally cancelled my ticket without my consent.

Facts:
1. The ticket was ticketed (had a ticket number).
2. I received a confirmation number, ticket number, and emails stating both
3. The ticket was paid for and my credit card charged.

United must reinstate the ticket within its original cabin. This trip is for travel TO the United States.

At no time during the booking process was any other fare than the Danish Krone equivalent displayed. As a reasonable, prudent consumer, I believed I was paying the price displayed to me on the website. United never sent or displayed the equivalent fare in any other currency.

Trip Details
Ticket #: 016XXXXXXXXXX
PNR: XXXXXX
Routing: LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL

Attachments: Attached is a document showing the ticket, routing, and providing proof that the reservation was ticketed.

Filename: Cancelled - UA Reservation - LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL - XXXXXX - 016XXXXXXXXXX.pdf

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant Law |
| http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/399.88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant FAQ |
| http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/rules/EAPP_2_FAQ.pdf |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Does the prohibition on post-purchase price increases in section 399.88(a) apply in the situation where a carrier mistakenly offers an airfare due to a computer problem or human error and a consumer purchases the ticket at that fare before the carrier is able to fix the mistake?

Section 399.88(a) states that it is an unfair and deceptive practice for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, or of a tour or tour component that includes scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation to a consumer after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of a government-imposed tax or fee and only if the passenger is advised of a possible increase before purchasing a ticket. A purchase occurs when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer. Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a “mistake.”
-----
Tips for retrieving your ticket number:
  1. paste(right click copy link location first) following link into your web browser
  2. change XXXXXX next to COPNR= for your reservation number and LASTNAME next to LN= for you SURNAME
  3. go to the webpage address you have just created

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...NRCD=2/11/2015


Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX View Post
R E L A X

Breathe deep.

Congrats on all who got in.

Now comes the fun part.

1. Discovery - mistake fare is posted on FT. Novices frantically checks how much vacation time they have and if the dates of availability mesh with their schedules. Experienced FTers just book it and worry about contacting spouses or their boss later. Word spreads like wildfire.

2. Excitement - Tickets purchased, confirmation emails received and dates of travel shared with other FTers. Discussions of what to see and do and where to stay crop up in other threads. Novices contact source to change seats or inquire about upgrades, Seasoned FTers sit back and enjoy reading the discussion threads.

3. Stress Stage 1 - Concern over paper ticket delivery - Novices Frantically check otheFedEx website every few hours, constant monitoring of driveway for FedEx truck. Seasoned FT veterans sit back and relax.

4. Glee and happiness - Paper tickets in hand, vacation request submitted, spouses finally informed, hotel reservations made and bragging to friends and co-workers begins. Both novices and experts get very excited.

5. Stress Stage 2 - Rumors of fare not being honored, discussion threads about the airline and ticketing agency ensue. Rumors crop up like crabgrass at this stage. Many FTers begin to worry excessively about whether or not the trip will happen. Novices make non-refundable and financial committments to their trip. Seasoned FTers make mixed drinks (and maybe a sandwich) and is patient.

6. Reality Check - Accurate information is obtained - usually takes place a week to 10 days after mistake fare is published. Confirmed information from the source as to whether or not tickets will be honored.

7a. Pure Joy (Icelandair style- Fare is Honored) - Lots of happy people, FT threads on shared information regarding hotels, restaurants, tours, etc. Jealousy from others sets in. First "FT guinea pigs" embark, post confirmation threads that all is ok.


7b Hostile Feelings (Copa Airlines Style - fare is not honored) - Many angry and disappointed FTers. Refunds are issued. Novices have multiple discussion threads of lawsuits and hostile correspondence, FT pros mutter "c'est la vie" and look for the next fare mistake.

8a Success (Honored) - Trip Report thread becomes very active


Freedom of Information Act Request
File #2015-147, Office of the Secretary of Transportation - Receipt acknowledged 3/13/15

http://www.dot.gov/individuals/foia/office-secretary-foia-information

Relevant excerpt from my request on 2/24/15. There no need for multiple requests for the same thing, though feel free to request more or different information obviously. I'll post any updates as I get them.

"Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S. C. subsection 552, I am requesting access to any and all records of correspondence, including electronic, between anyone working for, or on the behalf of, United Airlines and its subsidiaries, and with anyone working for, or on the behalf of, the Department of Transportation; specifically this would include only the date range beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015.

In addition, I am requesting access to any and all internal records and correspondence in relation to coming to the decision made on February 23rd, 2015 regarding the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings Determination Regarding United Airlines Mistaken Fare, with the exception of any of the consumer submitted complaints via phone, email, website, or letter. Specifically, this would be any records beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015."
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:31 pm
  #3946  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
The DKK Deal pending charges on our Chase Visa just dropped.

Praise Dad that my ad blockers hide the odious banner messages from UAL.

My first rodeo has been educational.
sonofzeus is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:32 pm
  #3947  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: united
Posts: 1,636
Originally Posted by SCSA
Continued allegations of criminal behaviour by purchasers from people who are "simply trying to present an alternative point of view"

Sickening
You can keep repeating this, without citations, as you have 5 or 6 times, but it doesn't make it true.

Nobody is saying any purchaser did anything more than take a shot. You are derailing the thread with a straw man argument that is not being made.
dilanesp is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:33 pm
  #3948  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Londinium
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 930
Does that mean you've officially been charged?
SCSA is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:41 pm
  #3949  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
Originally Posted by SCSA
Does that mean you've officially been charged?
Online purchases usually proceed from "pending" to "outstanding".

Since UAL voided the deal the same day, the "pending" went to "oblivion".
sonofzeus is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:49 pm
  #3950  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,006
Originally Posted by dilanesp
You can keep repeating this, without citations, as you have 5 or 6 times, but it doesn't make it true.

Nobody is saying any purchaser did anything more than take a shot. You are derailing the thread with a straw man argument that is not being made.

There's probabiy a guilty conscience as i was talking how the gas gas station analogy someone brought up was dealt in Italy.

No accusation to anyone was made (at least by me). As you well said, everyone give a shot to a mistake fare. Then some people know they were exploiting the system and let it go if caught. Some others try to create a distortion field to justify what they feel entitled too.
maclover is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:50 pm
  #3951  
336
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,443
Let me thank everyone who contributed to the wiki.

One nice addition would be an e-mail address to contact United.
336 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 2:59 pm
  #3952  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,898
Originally Posted by rachcollins
It doesn't ^

I suspect that United will be going back to contract basics and arguing ' unilateral mistake '

Hartog v Colin & Shields

Had Colin & Shields accepted payment and then shipped the Hare skins to Mr Hartog I doubt anyone would be familiar with the case
To the lawyers on here:

Can UA argue unilateral mistake when they repeatedly stated they did nothing wrong and filed the correct fare? At some point in time we need to apply the same logic to both parties.
Deltahater is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:11 pm
  #3953  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IAD
Programs: No Loyalty to any airline
Posts: 2,378
Originally Posted by 336
Let me thank everyone who contributed to the wiki.

One nice addition would be an e-mail address to contact United.
Are you looking for something that wouldn't be found here, on UA's webpage?
http://www.united.com/web/en-US/cont...t/default.aspx

Using this link in the Wiki also provides an email address;

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...ket/error.aspx
6rugrats is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:22 pm
  #3954  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: united
Posts: 1,636
Originally Posted by Deltahater
To the lawyers on here:

Can UA argue unilateral mistake when they repeatedly stated they did nothing wrong and filed the correct fare? At some point in time we need to apply the same logic to both parties.
1. Sure they can. Unilateral mistake just requires that a party contract to clearly incorrect terms in a situation where the other party could not reasonably believe there was no mistake, or engaged in some conduct to induce the mistake.

2. Further, people should avoid the mindset that public statements made by United now bind the company in legal proceedings. They don't. In any legal case, expect United's lawyers to take any position favorable to their defense, without regard to whether it was contained in their press releases or customer service communications.

3. However, bear in mind that the DOT rule requires that airlines honor at least some mistake fares that the common law of contractual mistake would permit to be rescinded.
dilanesp is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:24 pm
  #3955  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
Originally Posted by 336

One nice addition would be an e-mail address to contact United.
Easier to reach M. Cuban than J. Smisek.

Try to reach the head of their audit committee.
sonofzeus is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:34 pm
  #3956  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LHR
Programs: M&M,HH Gold,Accor Plat.,Priority Club Plat. Ambassador,Club Carlson Gold,Marriott Gold,GHA Plat.
Posts: 1,627
Originally Posted by dilanesp
1. Sure they can. Unilateral mistake just requires that a party contract to clearly incorrect terms in a situation where the other party could not reasonably believe there was no mistake, or engaged in some conduct to induce the mistake.

2. Further, people should avoid the mindset that public statements made by United now bind the company in legal proceedings. They don't. In any legal case, expect United's lawyers to take any position favorable to their defense, without regard to whether it was contained in their press releases or customer service communications.

3. However, bear in mind that the DOT rule requires that airlines honor at least some mistake fares that the common law of contractual mistake would permit to be rescinded.
and is it reasonable to believe that UA is not making pressure on the DoT in these days?
Paul4Travel is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:42 pm
  #3957  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: LA
Programs: DL PM
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by htran88
So instead of studying material relevant to my exams, I have now familiarized myself with the Hartog v Colin and Shields case. I also despise you for ruining my hopes of traveling LHR-ORD in first class.

BUT didn't United recently turn a mistake award fare into a mistake award fare sale? Also, I'd hate to see United hide behind rulings such as this every time they make a mistake. I agree with someone who doesn't like Delta that no other airline encountered this mistake because perhaps they paid to have these protections. Is it fair that United can cut those costs by just hiding behind such cases?
The common law principle of unilateral mistake would definitely apply in this situation, except for the fact that there is an explicit DOT regulation that says that airlines must honor mistake fares regardless. Written law trumps common law
DemonDeacon is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:56 pm
  #3958  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: Yorkshire Coastliner
Posts: 1,278
Originally Posted by sinus
They called it "fare misfile", but that was FD with 3x. I submitted claims to ECC (European Consumer Centre) but they were not helpful, advised to go legal way (suing OTA or airline). I gave up as ticketing carrier was non-EU.
You considered legal action because of a canceled FD ticket? Are you out of your mind?
patgarrett is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 3:58 pm
  #3959  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,898
Originally Posted by DemonDeacon
The common law principle of unilateral mistake would definitely apply in this situation, except for the fact that there is an explicit DOT regulation that says that airlines must honor mistake fares regardless. Written law trumps common law
Not sure if it matters, but the DOT 399.88 rule is just a regulation, not a law. Does a written regulation trump common law?
Deltahater is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2015, 4:12 pm
  #3960  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,859
Originally Posted by Deltahater
Not sure if it matters, but the DOT 399.88 rule is just a regulation, not a law. Does a written regulation trump common law?
Airlines also relay on ADAct for some cases. Not sure which is rock, paper and scissors.
Lack is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.