Last edit by: hhoope01
For a discussion around all the Marriott Bonvoy hotels visit the Marriott Bonvoy hotels in Bangkok, Thailand thread.
From LIH Prem's signature.
SPG and Marriott BKK property map
From LIH Prem's signature.
SPG and Marriott BKK property map
Bangkok: Which SPG hotel should I choose? [Master Thread]
#2071
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: perth
Programs: SPG(LTG), QANTAS gold, Korean, Accor Plat
Posts: 1,500
Yes, you missed the part about how I canceled the SGS before realizing that maybe we'd prefer location for this stay! (My default otherwise would be to prefer a suite to a nonsuite.)
And, clearly, I made my (poor) reservation choices before coming here for the awesome advice above. I'll look into the LM tonight, I had initially shied away from that after one too many lackluster LM experiences elsewhere.
That said, all this may be in vain -- my wife isn't feeling the greatest and I have fallen behind on some work to do remotely, so the guaranteed suite at the W & good hard product may end up winning out after all if it looks like we won't be going out quite as much.
thanks all, will report back
And, clearly, I made my (poor) reservation choices before coming here for the awesome advice above. I'll look into the LM tonight, I had initially shied away from that after one too many lackluster LM experiences elsewhere.
That said, all this may be in vain -- my wife isn't feeling the greatest and I have fallen behind on some work to do remotely, so the guaranteed suite at the W & good hard product may end up winning out after all if it looks like we won't be going out quite as much.
thanks all, will report back
I would choose the LM as next best and it is situated right across from Patpong Market. The suites are nice, cocktail hour excellent but a little further walk to BTS. If you dont get the suite upgrade then my opinion is the standard rooms suck! The others are all good in some respects and I will and do stay in them depending on price and where I want to be.
#2072
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
I like the (former Plaza) Athenee. It's walkable to both nightlife and shopping malls, has a good lounge (but the breakfast buffet for Plats is downstairs in the restaurant) and attractive pool area. I liked my suite, but the bathroom seemed dated, although it was large and luxurious.
Those who suggest the SGS should be careful to remember that Plats with 100+ stays there are treated differently from those staying for the first time. They treat Plats well, but they have lots of Plats, including returning customers.
Those who suggest the SGS should be careful to remember that Plats with 100+ stays there are treated differently from those staying for the first time. They treat Plats well, but they have lots of Plats, including returning customers.
#2073
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: AC 50K, NZ Gold
Posts: 222
Conflicted about where to stay in Bangkok this Wednesday & Thursday nights and would love any input.
I am traveling with my wife. Neither of us has ever been to Bangkok and we just thought we'd try a two-night visit after a nice week in Hong Kong. Currently I have the W booked ($150/night, SNA confirmed into a Marvelous Suite). I had the SGS booked on cash & points, but canceled it when the SNAs didn't come through but W's did.
Things we'd like to have, in order of importance:
#1 Good hard product (reliable air conditioning, nice shower/water pressure, good bed, etc.) -- reading about W led me to book it for these reasons
#2 Being "in the middle of the action" -- although we have honestly no idea what that means in terms of neighborhoods in Bangkok. (We are very well traveled and would love to be able to walk out the front door, turn the corner, and find a bar or live music or street full of food vendors, or whatnot). That said, we don't mind a short uber/taxi etc -- in HCMC we have stayed at the Park Hyatt, and taking an Uber 1-2 km to the backpackers street was just fine.
#3 Not spend a ton. I'm inclined not to want to spend more than the $150 rate I have at the W, which is why I didn't book the St. Regis (lowest rate I can get there is $237++). My other lowest available rates include: $108 (LM Suvarnabhumi), $111 (ROS), $136 (Westin), $137 (LM), $157 (Athenee), $194 (GH Erawan -- also considered staying there as I have Hyatt Glob).
Suite upgrade really isn't as important, which is why I'm asking for advice despite having cleared what looks like a nice upgrade at the W. But I've read a few places that the W is in a "business-y" location (this seems like people tend to weight it pretty strongly as a negative -- is that right?). But I've also read that it's near a Skytrain station so maybe that's not much of a negative? We have enjoyed using MTR around Hong Kong so don't mind that if it's easy to get to nightlife from the W via the Skytrain.
We would definitely make use of amenities like free drinks & laundry if available. We arrive at 7:25 p.m. Wednesday and leave around noon Friday. Would want to go out for dinner & general nightlife both Weds & Thurs.
Thanks for any thoughts, etc.
I am traveling with my wife. Neither of us has ever been to Bangkok and we just thought we'd try a two-night visit after a nice week in Hong Kong. Currently I have the W booked ($150/night, SNA confirmed into a Marvelous Suite). I had the SGS booked on cash & points, but canceled it when the SNAs didn't come through but W's did.
Things we'd like to have, in order of importance:
#1 Good hard product (reliable air conditioning, nice shower/water pressure, good bed, etc.) -- reading about W led me to book it for these reasons
#2 Being "in the middle of the action" -- although we have honestly no idea what that means in terms of neighborhoods in Bangkok. (We are very well traveled and would love to be able to walk out the front door, turn the corner, and find a bar or live music or street full of food vendors, or whatnot). That said, we don't mind a short uber/taxi etc -- in HCMC we have stayed at the Park Hyatt, and taking an Uber 1-2 km to the backpackers street was just fine.
#3 Not spend a ton. I'm inclined not to want to spend more than the $150 rate I have at the W, which is why I didn't book the St. Regis (lowest rate I can get there is $237++). My other lowest available rates include: $108 (LM Suvarnabhumi), $111 (ROS), $136 (Westin), $137 (LM), $157 (Athenee), $194 (GH Erawan -- also considered staying there as I have Hyatt Glob).
Suite upgrade really isn't as important, which is why I'm asking for advice despite having cleared what looks like a nice upgrade at the W. But I've read a few places that the W is in a "business-y" location (this seems like people tend to weight it pretty strongly as a negative -- is that right?). But I've also read that it's near a Skytrain station so maybe that's not much of a negative? We have enjoyed using MTR around Hong Kong so don't mind that if it's easy to get to nightlife from the W via the Skytrain.
We would definitely make use of amenities like free drinks & laundry if available. We arrive at 7:25 p.m. Wednesday and leave around noon Friday. Would want to go out for dinner & general nightlife both Weds & Thurs.
Thanks for any thoughts, etc.
HAVE FUN!!!
#2074
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Live: IWI; Work: DCA/Everywhere; Play: LAS/SJU/MLE
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Ambassador/LTP, Nat'l Exec Elite, LEYE Gold
Posts: 6,676
Different tastes for different hotels. ...
The W for the bed (the best in my opinion) and the breakfast (probably the best of all Bangkok Starwood properties), but only know the Marvelous suites. Not so many stays at this property but probably more than 15 stays. Poor Platinum benefits. The increasing number of restaurants around the hotel has made it more attractive.
The Westin for the good food at the lounge, the convenience of the location and the easy suite upgrades.
Sheraton Grande Sukhumvit for the good service, the location, the bed, the breakfast at Rossini, the evening drinks and when I want to be around a classic style. It has been quite a while since I do not need a 'discussion' to get a suite. Stayed twice at the Governor suite. ...
The W for the bed (the best in my opinion) and the breakfast (probably the best of all Bangkok Starwood properties), but only know the Marvelous suites. Not so many stays at this property but probably more than 15 stays. Poor Platinum benefits. The increasing number of restaurants around the hotel has made it more attractive.
The Westin for the good food at the lounge, the convenience of the location and the easy suite upgrades.
Sheraton Grande Sukhumvit for the good service, the location, the bed, the breakfast at Rossini, the evening drinks and when I want to be around a classic style. It has been quite a while since I do not need a 'discussion' to get a suite. Stayed twice at the Governor suite. ...
Originally Posted by Eugeniusz Bodo
Stick to W and you will love it!!! It is high energy and style forward but very classy place for young at heart! Station is right there but taxi cost peanuts!
HAVE FUN!!!
HAVE FUN!!!
Have to say -- we loved it. Email communication in advance of check in was very good. Mentioned wife wasn't feeling well in one of the emails & asked for a humidifier in the room. At check-in, the front desk agent confirmed that the humidifier was in the room, asked how wife was feeling, and offered to send up hot tea (which we accepted & came just minutes after we got to the room). In the room were also a bowl of 6 chocolate-covered strawberries and a plate of cookies with salted caramel dipping sauce (all free of charge), plus at least 12 comp bottles of water. Two free cocktails (indeed picture-worthy and made with quality ingredients e.g. Hendrick's gin) and a two-for-one after that were used the second night -- bar was very fun & energetic.
Overall, I felt none of the nickel-and-dimey feeling I associate with most US W properties. The spa was also wonderful -- we booked a couples massage (3570 baht total for the both of us, after the SPG discount) and they gave us (unsolicited) private use of the hammam jacuzzi and VIP room before & after the massage (i.e. they locked it off from the changing areas so that no one else could use the jacuzzi; presumably no one else had anything booked at the time but still, nice touch). Wife got a mani/pedi after, which was done well. Breakfast was also good, not best ever or anything, but much better than I expect with Starwood (on par with what I am used to getting at Hyatt properties where the Globalist breakfast benefit is usually much better than SPG's platinum breakfast).
Location-wise it was so easy to Uber everywhere that it didn't end up seeming to matter as much as I thought (we noted that it was a 40 baht, 4-minute Uber ride over to the Le Meridien by Patpong, and from there we walked a couple minutes to Ruen Urai where we had a delicious Thai dinner the first night -- so I can't say I see much of a location difference between these two properties). Second night we went up to the Sky Bar for overpriced drinks but a nice view, and had some excellent larb gai and pad thai at a small restaurant around the corner from there.
tldr -- All the rave reviews have convinced me to book the SGS next time, but I would happily stay at the W again. Didn't really see much of the city so a return trip is due before long.
#2075
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,051
I going to be in Bangkok with my husband for 3 nights and it will be the first time visiting for both of us.
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
#2077
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 486
I going to be in Bangkok with my husband for 3 nights and it will be the first time visiting for both of us.
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
Le Meridien is closer to the Sukhumvit line, but the location I think is not better than the W, unless you want to be closer to Patpong and the area around it. I've never stayed at Le Meridien but didn't want to be that close to Patpong.
#2078
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,051
Thanks for the responses. I had kind of forgotten the LM when I posted, though my impression (which is solely secondhand from FT reviews at this point) is that its location maybe isn't too much better than the W's.
Which among the SGS, WGS, TA and StR is the most "modern" in design? It looks like maybe the StR from what I can see? (I guess StRes can be considered "stuffy", though when I said that in my previous post I more meant "grandmotherly", if that makes any sense.)
Which among the SGS, WGS, TA and StR is the most "modern" in design? It looks like maybe the StR from what I can see? (I guess StRes can be considered "stuffy", though when I said that in my previous post I more meant "grandmotherly", if that makes any sense.)
#2079
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
None of the above really. The St Regis is the newest, but is a modern take on classical style. The WGS is not as retro as the SGS, but is hardly modern either.
#2080
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,769
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
The bathroom is fine, if you get a studio suite it is separated from the main room. No lounge and platinum treatment isn't like the SGS, but the service is still top notch. I never use the lounges when I'm in Bangkok anyway. As far as the location goes, the train is easily accessible from the W, you can go through Sathorn Square and get to the train fine, Siam is a few minutes away on the train. Taxis are always easy to get from the front of the W. I prefer things more quiet at night so I don't mind the location at all. It's quiet in the area at night, but the bar downstairs is nice. There is a Healthland really close to the hotel too that I go to whenever I am staying there too. I might be a little biased since the W is my favorite hotel in Bangkok. I don't like staying on Sukhumvit though.
From your criteria, I think that you will be happiest at LM. That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it!
#2081
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
I going to be in Bangkok with my husband for 3 nights and it will be the first time visiting for both of us.
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
How about the StR? It's directly connected to public transportation and modern in style, but there's not much within several blocks of the hotel. However, a few more blocks brings you to a famous temple and lots of shopping.
Do you want to be in the middle of Bangkok's raunchy stuff?
It could be nice to be on the river, but for Starwood, this means the Sheraton.
Do you want to be in the middle of Bangkok's raunchy stuff?
It could be nice to be on the river, but for Starwood, this means the Sheraton.
#2082
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott Titanium/LTG, IHG Platinum
Posts: 1,921
I going to be in Bangkok with my husband for 3 nights and it will be the first time visiting for both of us.
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
We usually prefer Ws despite their peculiarities, but from all of the reviews here and on other threads it sounds like the W BKK might be a pass for the subpar location and the odd bathroom layout.
It sounds like the SGS is much beloved and I have heard good things from friends IRL as well. But while it's hard to tell from the pictures I've found, I'm not sold on the style -- we definitely prefer a more modern/less stuffy style of design. Easy proximity to public transit is also important.
Not overly concerned about Platinum treatment for this trip ... a suite is nice to have but not a dealbreaker, and we plan to do lots of eating around the city so don't necessarily care about lounge access or other freebies.
Any thoughts on which of the hotels other than the W meets those criteria?
The LM isn't too far from the W but will feel pretty close to the W in terms of room ambience and that might be your next option.
However, for me, head straight to the St Regis. The decor feels opulent but modern. It can get busy but will never feel as busy as the SGS. The service is generally positive (sometimes they produce the odd fault though).
Now old world luxury? Not in my books, the SGS is in a contemporary hotel block, with great service, but decor which make it feel old. The morning buffets are often a zoo. To me, that doesn't make it old world luxury.I am thinking of European LC properties that fall into old world luxury but SGS, nahhhhh not for me.
#2083
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: body: A stone's throw from SFO, mind: SE Asia
Programs: Some of this 'n some of that
Posts: 17,263
I think that LM's location is much better than that of the W. IMO the W is in the middle of a field of office buildings with not much else around. Patpong? It's a limited area, and easy to avoid if that's your preference. I wouldn't allow the proximity of Patpong to have me avoid LM. It's an excellent hotel which seems to tick all of your boxes.
For me, 'grandmotherly' is the right word. If the SGS was a person in the family, who would it be? Definitely my grandmother. She's the soul of the family, always nice, supportive and willing to help out but why must she always wear ugly clothing - that's substance over style any day.
#2085
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,769