![]() |
Originally Posted by gloreglabert
(Post 21678548)
1. Old-style Vanilla Visas (variable): success 2. New-style Vanilla Visas (fixed): failure, in same transaction as #1 3. New-style Vanilla Visas (variable): success problem is i'm stuck with $$$ New-style Vanilla Visas (fixed) any workarounds? |
Originally Posted by apuraja
(Post 21704872)
ditto per attempts earlier this evening.
problem is i'm stuck with $$$ New-style Vanilla Visas (fixed) any workarounds? |
Originally Posted by lacuadra
(Post 21699099)
Got a new vanilla reload card and boy they are more delicate than before. I almost deleted the entire numbers. And I used my finger nail.
Maybe this has already being reported but if not I suggest to scratch very, very gently or risk removing the entire pin code. I had to use a magnifying glass to recover some numbers. |
Could anyone share a picture of the "new" vanilla card?
Edit: I mean the picture of the package, not the card, of the "new" design. |
Here is the pattern I've identified. Card numbers that start with 484735 have working PINs. Card numbers that start with 484718 do not have working PINs. I have no counterexamples to the above rule.
|
Went to two additional CVS stores today to buy Beans with the new Vanillas, and the new Vanillas will not function as debit with Pin. So, forced to use as credit. One CVS would not allow me to use as credit card without my name on it (debit and pin would have been fine), but other was fine with it.
Last night, I registered each using my zip code, and cleared pin just to make sure. Per today's experience, no difference. Any one try a "normal" purchase? Wondering if these are somehow triggered by BB loads or VR purchases. If same problem with a normal purchase, don't these violate the new law requiring them to have pins and function as debit? |
Originally Posted by BigDawgFT
(Post 21705225)
Went to two additional CVS stores today to buy Beans with the new Vanillas, and the new Vanillas will not function as debit with Pin. So, forced to use as credit. One CVS would not allow me to use as credit card without my name on it (debit and pin would have been fine), but other was fine with it.
Last night, I registered each using my zip code, and cleared pin just to make sure. Per today's experience, no difference. Any one try a "normal" purchase? Wondering if these are somehow triggered by BB loads or VR purchases. If same problem with a normal purchase, don't these violate the new law requiring them to have pins and function as debit? Technically the ruling you're referring doesn't require GCs to have PINs. It just recommends it, and the banks regard these recommendations as more or less required. But I don't recommend calling them up and telling them they're breaking the law or something, because they're not. |
Went to my local grocery store to buy Reloadits, for which I can only use a debit card with pin. New Vanillas failed there as well. I was able to use my Staples-purchased back-ups, and my few, remaining old style Vanillas.
|
Originally Posted by gloreglabert
(Post 21705201)
Here is the pattern I've identified. Card numbers that start with 484735 have working PINs. Card numbers that start with 484718 do not have working PINs. I have no counterexamples to the above rule.
|
Originally Posted by gloreglabert
(Post 21705350)
Technically the ruling you're referring doesn't require GCs to have PINs. It just recommends it, and the banks regard these recommendations as more or less required. But I don't recommend calling them up and telling them they're breaking the law or something, because they're not.
Good job figuring out which series are giving trouble! |
Originally Posted by vagrants
(Post 21713520)
you can do the same as HIGCs...complain and send the cards to InComm for refunds.
What if I only planned to shop groceries at ALDY which accepts only debit cards?? Package clearly mentions PINs. Or let them send us proper PIN-enabled cards, or VRs :) |
Originally Posted by pier11
(Post 21713793)
I thought about that too.
What if I only planned to shop groceries at ALDY which accepts only debit cards?? Package clearly mentions PINs. Or let them send us proper PIN-enabled cards, or VRs :) "Please refund my pinless gift card via VR, thank you." :) |
Originally Posted by ricohitman
(Post 21714369)
I can see that email:
"Please refund my pinless gift card via VR, thank you." :) |
Originally Posted by gloreglabert
(Post 21705201)
Here is the pattern I've identified. Card numbers that start with 484735 have working PINs. Card numbers that start with 484718 do not have working PINs. I have no counterexamples to the above rule.
Ended up using Metabank $200 cards instead of the 18s to pay for the MO. I guess I'll have to use the 18s to buy VR or $500 GC instead. Might call and ask about it since the package clearly mentions that they are PIN enabled, but my hopes aren't high. One other option to unload the 18s I haven't seen mentioned yet is the Amex for Target card. Limited to $5k per 28 days, and the fees are high if you do more than 1 ATM withdrawal per month on each card for $800/month, but Target has no problem with doing split tender transactions to pay for a load or using GC to pay in my experience. I always go to the customer service desk to load as they are generally more knowledgeable. Anyone try the Vanilla MCs recently? I know the MCs are more of a pain to get to work as debit in the first place, but I'd be curious to know whether the new style affected them as well. Let's all hope this is just an anomaly and not a sign of things to come. Even if this just spread to the other Vanilla GC and not the other banks', it'd cripple our favorite pharmacy :( |
Originally Posted by Lemma
(Post 21715959)
One other option to unload the 18s I haven't seen mentioned yet is the Amex for Target card.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.