![]() |
Originally Posted by DLfan
(Post 12260235)
What's left to discuss...seems like you two have the math pretty well figured out.
Personally, I wish Delta would let me upgrade a YBM international ticket for $50 after my 6 PMUs are depleted (which happened this year in early June). If this is how Delta values them, wouldn't it make more sense to grab the incremental revenue (cash)? They are not a benefit that DL gives away that costs DL something. They are a coupon that DL gives away to sell more business seats while protecting business seat pricing. Since the PMU is a personal benefit to flyers, DL expects that they will be used by Elites for personal travel. It's not like you're going to use your PMU to save your company some money on a business seat. So the PMU leets DL make the price of a business seat a bit less for leisure travel without having to pay fare class games to keep their business fares higher when companies are actually buying business-class seats. M-fares are clearly set at the point where DL thinks the number of people who buy a $2500 M-fare instead of a $800 discount coach fare times $1700 best offsets the number of people who buy a $2500 M-fare instead of a $2800 discount business fare times the $300. The ability to use PMUs on day-of-travel are not a 'new benefit', but a fix of their systems to make it more likely that travelers will gamble $1700 on the chance to use a PMU. PMUs are all about getting DL more money in the short term on ticket sales. NW SWUs were about getting more money in the long term by engendering loyalty from their frequent customers. You can see this difference in philosophy everywhere - DL focuses on getting as much money as they can right now, while NW focused on having a long-term profitable relationship. |
Originally Posted by atldlff
(Post 12259752)
OK... I think I am beginning to understand why you are confused here. First of all you have to realize that 2010 is a unique year. The program is new, and it won't be implemented on March 1st.
"Those who earn at least 125,000 MQMs in 2009 will be recognized as Diamonds as soon as the program begins in spring 2010. " Now I realize that this DOES require some interpretation. Spring 2010, doesn't officially start until March 20th, 2010. Spring officially ends June 21st, 2010. Therefore, the Diamond program will start somewhere in between those two dates. Hell, even a gopher has a say on when spring is +/- 6 weeks. The simple reason there is not an exact date is that the have to finalize all of the full IT implementation of the program. Based on that post, as well as information shown on Delta.com, and the fact that the program cannot start before March 20th at the earliest, I believe my statement is correct. you CAN NOT start 2010 as a DM - FULL STOP. With all due respect, I don't think I am interpreting anything. I am just stating the facts based on what is presented. If we got the post below from Delta, would that answer it for you?: If you fly 125,000 MQMs in 2009 - You will first be awarded Platinum status in February in 2010 and be able to choose one choice benefit. Once the Diamond program is implemented in the Spring of 2010, you will be awarded Diamond status and be able to choose two additional choice benefits for a total of three Choice Benefits in 2010. The DM choice benefit selections (do or do not) have to be unique. Frankly, I'm surprised they didn't just say "One PM benefit when you make PM. One more choice when you make DM. Two DM choices when you start the program year at DM." That would thus make an INCENTIVE to start the program year at DM instead of a DISincentive. OR, DL could have made DM 100k, but only provided one DM benefit with a 'bonus' benefit at 125k. Upgrade queue would probably work out better (esp. if 125k was given even higher priority), but think of all the award change fees DL would lose out on! (Solve the rollover MQM problem though.) But DL's FF program folks don't seem to do a good job of thinking through all the behavior consequences of their program choices. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 12260745)
Says who? You keep saying all this, but you've got no information from a reliable source that says it's anything other than your personal guess.
*IF* you assume that SkyMilesInsider is using a definition of spring that is based on the time between the sun being at equinox and solstice. It could very well be that SkyMilesInsider means spring as in "when it's getting warmer". Most people consider June 21st to be well into summer, which for most people (in the US anyway) is about Memorial Day to Labor Day. And I think DL would have a pretty hard time if DM benefits didn't roll out until after Memorial Day and they attempted to argue that it was still spring. Hell, even a gopher has a say on when spring is +/- 6 weeks. I agree that DL is unwilling to predict the precise date of availability for some benefits. But I also strongly suspect that if there is any way DL can not give a 3rd set of Choice Benefits to DMs, they will find a way to do so. That's not a fact, that's a GUESS. With all due respect, you're guessing. You've decided what you want to think, and you're interpreting everything in the light that leads to the conclusion you've already made. That would be one acceptable answer. Frankly, I'm surprised they didn't just say "One PM benefit when you make PM. One more choice when you make DM. Two DM choices when you start the program year at DM." That would thus make an INCENTIVE to start the program year at DM instead of a DISincentive. OR, DL could have made DM 100k, but only provided one DM benefit with a 'bonus' benefit at 125k. Upgrade queue would probably work out better (esp. if 125k was given even higher priority), but think of all the award change fees DL would lose out on! (Solve the rollover MQM problem though.) But DL's FF program folks don't seem to do a good job of thinking through all the behavior consequences of their program choices. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 12260678)
You can see this difference in philosophy everywhere - DL focuses on getting as much money as they can right now, while NW focused on having a long-term profitable relationship.
|
Originally Posted by atldlff
(Post 12259752)
If you fly 125,000 MQMs in 2009 - You will first be awarded Platinum status in February in 2010 and be able to choose one choice benefit. Once the Diamond program is implemented in the Spring of 2010, you will be awarded Diamond status and be able to choose two additional choice benefits for a total of three Choice Benefits in 2010. The DM choice benefit selections (do or do not) have to be unique. |
Originally Posted by PMMMDL
(Post 12260800)
Does the answer to any of this really make a difference in how many additional flights and in what fare class you will make on Delta for the rest of this year?
Not that it matters really - things should be communicated clearly simply because it's the right thing to do. |
Originally Posted by DLfan
(Post 12260235)
Personally, I wish Delta would let me upgrade a YBM international ticket for $50 after my 6 PMUs are depleted (which happened this year in early June). If this is how Delta values them, wouldn't it make more sense to grab the incremental revenue (cash)?
|
Originally Posted by DeltaFirst
(Post 12260920)
If NWA was so interested in your well being and "focus on having a long-term profitable relationship", then why did NWA sell you down the river?
If you don't like Delta, go somewhere else. For one, you're not adding any value to the discussion at hand. And finally the whinning about what you lost from NWA is really pathetic when it's written and read over and over again. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 12261284)
Yes. Not so much that I care if I get 4, 10 or 16 PMUs that I *MIGHT* be able to use 2 of *IF* I go to Hawaii, but the lack of straightforward communication in general affects whether I want to stay with this program or not, and whether I want to stay with this program or not directly affects my future spend on DL.
From the sound of your posts, I thought it was a foregone conclusion that you would be finding a new Frequent Flyer home next year. If I were so unhappy with a program and a company, I would certainly have already moved all my future flights (as I did with United Airlines, US Airways, and will do next year with Thai Airways, although I was never as upset with any of those companies as you seem to be with Delta). |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 12261320)
I have not been whining about what I lost from NW. I've been whining about the apparent lack of ability to honestly, directly, and effectively communicate exhibited by DL. NW isn't relevant. SEPARATELY, I did make note that DL and NW appear to approach their frequent flyer programs differently - one takes the money now approach, and one took the money later approach. There was no judgment on 'better' there - that was just something you inserted yourself. I think the program basics have been well communicated. |
Originally Posted by PMMMDL
(Post 12261341)
From the sound of your posts, I thought it was a foregone conclusion that you would be finding a new Frequent Flyer home next year.
If you track my posts over the past 8 months, you'll see I've gone from pretty supportive of the merger to pretty not happy with the new situation. There are a pile of factors that led to that change, although the turning point was around June for me. Note I don't *WANT* to switch - I'd far prefer DL upped their game. But if the answer really is take-it-or-leave-it, it might just have to be leave-it. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 12261397)
Not quite - right now, probably going to go with cheapest airfare available, depending what shakes out of UA/CO.
If you track my posts over the past 8 months, you'll see I've gone from pretty supportive of the merger to pretty not happy with the new situation. There are a pile of factors that led to that change, although the turning point was around June for me. Note I don't *WANT* to switch - I'd far prefer DL upped their game. But if the answer really is take-it-or-leave-it, it might just have to be leave-it. |
Originally Posted by PMMMDL
(Post 12261536)
For someone who flies at Gold level, I don't know what else you could want. DL gives Golds a very generous percentage of bonus miles, free bags, plus unlimited space available upgrades. That is as good or better than any other USA airline. What do you really expect for 50K MQMs per year?
I wouldn't be able to make 125k on AA/UA/CO since they don't hand out elite miles like candy, but could make 100k. And the 100k program on AA is definitely superior to DL's 125k, and I think UA's 100k is better as well. Throw in ease of mileage redemption, the only thing DL has going for them is convenience, but even that's getting to be a tough argument when only managing 2 flights a day into my home airport and not letting me book anything with more than a 4-hour connection in MSP. The reality of the situation is I think I'm better off just buying the cheapest ticket. I fly enough that I'd stil keep base-elite on at least two alliances for free bags along with free bags on Southwest and have access to the largest network on the planet (every airline). |
Originally Posted by TheMadBrewer
(Post 12261303)
Or let me sell you my unused PMUs for whatever you'd pay for them.
|
Originally Posted by PMMMDL
(Post 12261536)
For someone who flies at Gold level, I don't know what else you could want.
Further, I feel better about doing business with someone when they exhibit a certain level of competence. Communicate effectively! I'm actually DEFENDING DL over in the NW forum from a bunch of NW elites irked that the carry-over EQM option in the elite extraperks program was eliminated as a result of the introduction of rollover miles, when that's actually an IMPROVEMENT. DL just did a horrible job of communicating the change, first claiming it was a technical issue that the option went away and it would be back, then fessing up later that they were just canning the option entirely. If it's not coming back, don't tell people it's coming back! Negative reaction to the lie, along with a failure to show how the change was an improvement, blinded most to the fact that instead of having to choose carryover EQM instead of something else, now they get the carryover EQM ANYWAY (and more of it) and STILL get to choose something else! I will say that the vast majority of my issues fall into the areas of FF program (some on value, some on treatment of customers/communication) and SkyClub product degradation. There are lots of other things that are not as good as they used to be, but that's just the nature of the airline industry, and DL gets people from point A to point B just as well as any other carrier. But, when all carriers are pretty much equally good about getting you from one place to the other safely, that means if you don't want people just flying the cheapest ticket they can find, you need to offer something that distinguishes yourself from the other guy. Honest, effective communication with your customers is one of the things that can distinguish you from the other guy, and one of the best things about it is it's FREE! But for some reason DL insists on continuing to shoot themselves in the foot at nearly every opportunity. We get it, changes are necessary, but you can help yourself a lot by just telling it like it is the first time. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.