DL to buy VX?
#31
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
I think people are underestimating the value of SFO slots in this thread. Delta's operation here pales compared to UA and AA. San Francisco has one of the strongest economies in the world right now, and Delta is missing out.
#32
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
SFO is not slot controlled. Delta could start any flights it wanted. It would be very stupid going against UA though.
#34
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 5,951
Fair enough, although that merger wasn't in the last decade (the timeframe the post I was replying to referred to). More substantively, at that time, there were still enough legacies around that a merger, particularly of two small players even for the time, didn't threaten to substantially reduce competition in the way it would now, so the HP/US merger really isn't a useful analogy to antitrust concerns about any merger involving today's WN, AA, DL, or UA.
#35
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MLB
Posts: 445
Beyond federal regulatory approval, the main question in my mind is whether VX travelers would stick with DL post-merger. Perhaps DL could craft an onboard Virgin branding/experience that might come into play in retaining the customer base VX has built, especially in transcon markets and millenial-heavy tech cities - AUS, SFO, etc. The VX crowd might just view DL as another boring legacy and move their business elsewhere. If they don't feel they can retain the customer base, the other assets aren't worth it for DL.
On a tangent, I would personally love for DL to be able to move its SFO operations into Terminal 2 if they do buy VX. It's a beautiful space, especially compared to the cramped quarters in DL's current location there.
On a tangent, I would personally love for DL to be able to move its SFO operations into Terminal 2 if they do buy VX. It's a beautiful space, especially compared to the cramped quarters in DL's current location there.
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
So DL buys VX to make SFO a hub? Why? To sabotage their own project at SEA?
Delta would have to give up a lot in such a purchase. Gates and slots at restricted airports. Because the DoJ would want those assets to go to a smaller carrier which has limited access to those. And not to remain in the hands of an even larger domestic carrier.
Like I said, purchasing VX is a pretty cost-ineffective way to obtain two gates at DAL (for flights which would probably just go to their hub airports) and some additional A320s.
Delta would have to give up a lot in such a purchase. Gates and slots at restricted airports. Because the DoJ would want those assets to go to a smaller carrier which has limited access to those. And not to remain in the hands of an even larger domestic carrier.
Like I said, purchasing VX is a pretty cost-ineffective way to obtain two gates at DAL (for flights which would probably just go to their hub airports) and some additional A320s.
#38
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: DL PM MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 3,276
Beyond federal regulatory approval, the main question in my mind is whether VX travelers would stick with DL post-merger. Perhaps DL could craft an onboard Virgin branding/experience that might come into play in retaining the customer base VX has built, especially in transcon markets and millenial-heavy tech cities - AUS, SFO, etc. The VX crowd might just view DL as another boring legacy and move their business elsewhere. If they don't feel they can retain the customer base, the other assets aren't worth it for DL.
On a tangent, I would personally love for DL to be able to move its SFO operations into Terminal 2 if they do buy VX. It's a beautiful space, especially compared to the cramped quarters in DL's current location there.
On a tangent, I would personally love for DL to be able to move its SFO operations into Terminal 2 if they do buy VX. It's a beautiful space, especially compared to the cramped quarters in DL's current location there.
If VX is gone, there is no real strong carrier to take their place. Almost all of these routes are flown by UA anyway and they made a conscious decision to avoid UA. The only "hip" airline left would be B6 and they are making their product more unhip with less legroom.
So DL buys VX to make SFO a hub? Why? To sabotage their own project at SEA?
Delta would have to give up a lot in such a purchase. Gates and slots at restricted airports. Because the DoJ would want those assets to go to a smaller carrier which has limited access to those. And not to remain in the hands of an even larger domestic carrier.
Like I said, purchasing VX is a pretty cost-ineffective way to obtain two gates at DAL (for flights which would probably just go to their hub airports) and some additional A320s.
Delta would have to give up a lot in such a purchase. Gates and slots at restricted airports. Because the DoJ would want those assets to go to a smaller carrier which has limited access to those. And not to remain in the hands of an even larger domestic carrier.
Like I said, purchasing VX is a pretty cost-ineffective way to obtain two gates at DAL (for flights which would probably just go to their hub airports) and some additional A320s.
#39
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Osaka
Programs: United Mileage Plus Premier Executive
Posts: 581
I hope not! Delta service is awful compared to Virgin America!! The service on VA is friendly, modern and reasonable. Delta service is dated and unfriendly! It would be a shame to see a great airline taken over by one that needs so much improvement.
#40
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,712
Coming from someone who appears to fly UA frequently.
#41
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Interesting, I've heard the opposite about VX. The Virgin group is well known to be a snotty group of people who think they are better than everyone else. Look no further than their cult leader, uh I mean founder, Richard Branson. For the most part Delta inflight service is very good.
#42
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: DL PM MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 3,276
The biggest thing I liked about VX was their first class food. It was pretty tasty.
#43
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: UA Million Mile, Mileage Plus Premier 1K, SkyMiles Gold Medallion, AAdvantage Gold
Posts: 875
Also remember that AA/US almost didn't happen. And a big reason it did happen was because AA was a mess that was in bankruptcy and needed to be fixed. Neither VX or DL are bankrupt or in a dire situation
#44
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
Seriously? I have never flown VX, but Delta typically has fantastic, award winning service. It might not be like a nasty Las Vegas club, but some of us are actually OK with that.