Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

A disappointing experience - or a reflection of how things are?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A disappointing experience - or a reflection of how things are?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 9:02 pm
  #91  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BWI
Programs: HHonors Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 774
Originally Posted by nwrep2009
Sounds like you were having a bad day and bad luck. Delta did nothing wrong here, you should just shrug this off and move on. It could happen on any US carrier. Cheers.
OP could have said the same thing in the case of the medical emergency; person had a bad medical day, could happen to anyone, not his/her problem, why go the extra mile. Cheers.

There is something to say about rote 'follow the rules' mentality, thus pissing off a family of frequent travelers, and bending the rules in the case of split family (OPs choice, so not THAT much sympathy) and a deserted F cabin.
pokeable is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 9:43 pm
  #92  
1M
40 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: |QF LTG|DL Gold|
Posts: 1,784
Originally Posted by longing4piedmont
Great! Another daily thread once again proving those with a huge sense of entitlement simply don't believe and can't see that they possess it.
LOL. Perhaps to DYKWIA can be added MAEFM (Make An Exception For Me).
Supersonic Swinger is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 9:57 pm
  #93  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: SPG Plat, Emerald Exec., PC Plat, AA, CO, DL, UBS Charter Card, Palladium Card, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,694
Originally Posted by Supersonic Swinger
Babies are banned in MH from F, and children under 12 from a certain section of Y on the A380. A ban is a ban.
You stated "kids are banned from F" this is not the case, simply what he was stating is that is a stretch from the reality.
mlad1101 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 10:10 pm
  #94  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lax
Programs: DL DM, SPG Plat
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by VVF
The 2 yo was for some reason fussing instead of falling asleep as he normally does, needed to be changed (he ended up in our arms for most of the flight), so I went to an FA to give her our coats and was then helping my wife with changing, moving the bags to the overhead bins, unpacking the blankets/pillows, etc.

The purser showed up no, not with drinks or menus, and not to welcome us or greet us by name but to tell me that I could not be in the Business cabin. Mind you, we were still on the ground, with the door open, I was on my knees in the bulkhead well out of everyones way attending to our son...
Were you changing your son in the seat? Gross...
edscholl is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 10:19 pm
  #95  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium.;UA 1.5MM; UA Lifetime Gold (whoppee); DL Plat
Posts: 2,129
just reading this made me throw up..too long and emotional--facts and list them
boss315 is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 10:23 pm
  #96  
VVF
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 99
Originally Posted by edscholl
Were you changing your son in the seat? Gross...
Sorry, I did not realize that 2 yo required complete privacy to change into pajamas. I am afraid it is your attitude that is gross. Prude!
VVF is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 11:19 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lax
Programs: DL DM, SPG Plat
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by VVF
Sorry, I did not realize that 2 yo required complete privacy to change into pajamas. I am afraid it is your attitude that is gross. Prude!
Ah, pjs. Not the kind of 'changing' i had in mind.
edscholl is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 11:24 pm
  #98  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX, SFO
Programs: Delta GM, Lifetime Marriott Platinum, Avis Preferred
Posts: 1,634
Originally Posted by VVF
Sorry, I did not realize that 2 yo required complete privacy to change into pajamas. I am afraid it is your attitude that is gross. Prude!

If you want to turn this into a p-----g contest we can do that. You insulted my integrity above, you called the above poster a prude. Do I personally care? Nope. I am not that sensitive at all. But quite frankly, whatever good will you hoped to get from this board decreases with each successive post of yours. As someone above said, some people agree with you, some disagree with you. And that's the way it is going to be. Period. But insulting those who disagree with you makes many begin to question the veracity of your original complaint and your overall attitude, and it won't change a single attitude here about your original complaint. The world does not revolve around you.. As someone else also said, for many of us, it was difficult even getting through your original post because of its length, but many people here in good faith took the time to do so. If you do write DL, ,my last suggestion before I say sayonara and let you wallow in your misery and angst, is to suggest that you cut your original post in half before emailing it to DL. And absolutely finally, people here, whether they agree with you or not, have long memories about those who insult others here and may well judge your future posts and complaints, and their reasonableness or lack thereof, by your attitude in this thread.

And with that, I, too, am through with you and this thread. Bye.
waltinsocal is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 11:26 pm
  #99  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: RDU
Posts: 389
Originally Posted by Thomas Hudson
years ago, they would have slipped you up there and it would have been a win/win as far as I am concerned. Now, if they did, some Gold in EC would have written a letter about unfair treatment.

It seems to me the FA was on the defensive. Either by perception or prejudice of you having kids and being split up. Not saying it is right, but it may explain the situation...
I agree completely. I wonder what the responses to this post would have been if the only info from the OP was that they had to fly TPAC with a row of broken IFEs and power ports, with empty seats and only one paying pax in BE.

Not so long ago, that would have been an auto OPUP on DL.
HookemHorns is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 12:21 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Programs: Delta DM MM, IHG Plat, Hilton DM, Marriott SE, Emerald EE, Oakdale Gun Club, NRA & GOA Life Member
Posts: 3,870
Originally Posted by waltinsocal
If you want to turn this into a p-----g contest we can do that. You insulted my integrity above, you called the above poster a prude. Do I personally care? Nope. I am not that sensitive at all. But quite frankly, whatever good will you hoped to get from this board decreases with each successive post of yours. As someone above said, some people agree with you, some disagree with you. And that's the way it is going to be. Period. But insulting those who disagree with you makes many begin to question the veracity of your original complaint and your overall attitude, and it won't change a single attitude here about your original complaint. The world does not revolve around you.. As someone else also said, for many of us, it was difficult even getting through your original post because of its length, but many people here in good faith took the time to do so. If you do write DL, ,my last suggestion before I say sayonara and let you wallow in your misery and angst, is to suggest that you cut your original post in half before emailing it to DL. And absolutely finally, people here, whether they agree with you or not, have long memories about those who insult others here and may well judge your future posts and complaints, and their reasonableness or lack thereof, by your attitude in this thread.

And with that, I, too, am through with you and this thread. Bye.
Walt's post ought to be made a sticky for newcomers. I'm in agreement with Mr. Hudson's comments here and I have no ill will towards the OP. In fact, I came across this post when it first went up, scanned it for length and moved on to a different thread. But, I finally read it and I'll also say I'll agree with whomever (I forgot and am not going back to look it up) said that the purser probably reacted due to many experiences of split families between cabins before. If I were the purser, I may not have moved the OP into BE after the IFE/power issues but I certainly would have after the medical emergency (shouldn't there be an abbreviation for that on here...ME? hehe).

Anyhoo, OP, drop the non rev stuff, mention the IFE snafu and the rudeness of the FA and feel free to mention the empty BE cabin. I'm sure it's policy more than anything the kept you out of there...which is stupid, under the circumstances but I don't blame the purser for that.
yohanson is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 12:51 am
  #101  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: DL FO, UA, AA, AsiaMiles, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 7,982
Originally Posted by ND76
One unpleasantness I've noticed over the years on international flights is how confrontational certain FAs can be with Y pax standing up near the curtain. I once had a row 15 seat (first row of coach); I put my carry-on in the bin overhead the pilot rest seat, and a male FA rousted me when I got up to get something out of the bag mid-flight. I've occasionally seen them harrass others sitting near the curtain that they surmise might be trying to invade BE. They never seem to harrass pax on domestic flights in Y coming up to use the forward lav.
They should. Not harass, just stand firm. But the aggressiveness you described in the remainder of your post is unacceptable. Don't get haughty with a pax until they actually force the issue.
HongKonger is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 12:59 am
  #102  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO
Posts: 1,723
Originally Posted by N808DE
I already dislike children in BE and anyone (friends or family) who are in Y and come up to J to visit/talk/whatever. It is disturbing. If families can not be separated without checking on each other then they should purchase seats together.
Setting aside any emotional opinions on entitlement/NRSA/DYKWIA/babies/PDBs/etc, the correct answer really is this simple. It really is.

Passengers from coach should not enter BE to contact family/friends unless a true EMERGENCY is occurring at which point an FA/pilot should be involved. Changing a diaper isn't an emergency nor is a child vomiting. These are both routine childcare responsibilities, and if both parents feel the need to be present for such events they need to purchase tickets in the same cabin. It would be no different for people traveling with spouses or friends. Outside a true medical emergency I can't think of a situation where contact would be required.

For those who think such a viewpoint is callous and unfriendly, I would question whether they understand the slippery slope of allowing constant visits to another cabin for leisure purposes.
vxmike is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 1:01 am
  #103  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: DL FO, UA, AA, AsiaMiles, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 7,982
Originally Posted by Supersonic Swinger
I'm sure about it (http://www.ausbt.com.au/malaysia-air...on-airbus-a380), more airlines should take a leaf out of MH's book, and the fact the OP's request is seen as "nothing out of the ordinary" reflects a lack of consideration for other passengers.
They won't. If an airline does this they will lose out on the F/J business of people who want to bring their children with them. But people who are annoyed by children/babies in F/J obviously aren't going to choose Y instead which is inevitably worse, and they're not going to go to another airline because they're all alike in this respect with the exception of MH.
HongKonger is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 1:03 am
  #104  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO
Posts: 1,723
Originally Posted by yohanson

Anyhoo, OP, drop the non rev stuff, mention the IFE snafu and the rudeness of the FA and feel free to mention the empty BE cabin. I'm sure it's policy more than anything the kept you out of there...which is stupid, under the circumstances but I don't blame the purser for that.
Why is the policy stupid that the FAs kept him in coach? If I was a solo Diamond in coach and saw someone moved to BE just because they had kids up there I would be livid. Are you really suggesting that DL just move him up front because he has kids??? There's a reason the BE cabin was empty...the OP wanted it but obviously didn't value it highly enough to pay for it.
vxmike is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 1:04 am
  #105  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: DL FO, UA, AA, AsiaMiles, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 7,982
Originally Posted by brkandjfk
Case in point: Four people standing in a line watching an accident happen will see and accurately describe four different accidents. Each one's perspective will provide an accurate rendition of the events, and their assessment on the "what caused it" portion of the accident will be significantly impacted by their own perspective.
Rashomon
HongKonger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.