![]() |
I have capital one card I use all the time - if I link that in my Bilt profile, will I get the status on Bilt? - I don't care about double and triple dip for now
Originally Posted by CaptJOB
(Post 36056247)
My understanding is that you won't get the 2x Bilt points if you have Hilton as your preferred partner but that the spend SHOULD count towards the fast track to Bilt status. I feel like I've seen the dollar counter move up on my Fast Track when paying with the CSR(added to Bilt wallet) but I also have Bilt as my preferred partner in Lyft so no way of knowing if that is a requirement or not without doing more testing than I feel like(sorry).
|
Gary Leff reports that the AA relationship with Bilt will end in June. However, there was a report on reddit earlier this week that for a brief time, AS showed up as a transfer partner, which sounded like an addition that was rolled out to the app too early. So hopefully there will be an announcement on that soon.
|
Originally Posted by dw
(Post 36076569)
So hopefully there will be an announcement on that soon.
|
Just to be sure, transfers to AA don't generate Loyalty Points, correct?
|
Originally Posted by dw
(Post 36076569)
Gary Leff reports that the AA relationship with Bilt will end in June. However, there was a report on reddit earlier this week that for a brief time, AS showed up as a transfer partner, which sounded like an addition that was rolled out to the app too early. So hopefully there will be an announcement on that soon.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
(Post 36077308)
Cost cutting??
|
Not at all my area of expertise (if there is any) and I didn’t stay … never mind.
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 36077330)
… as the airlines come to see Bilt as a "credit card" partner rather than as a "rent rewards" program …
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 36077330)
… I imagine that Barclays and Citi complained, and I expect that Chase is also complaining.
I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. |
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
(Post 36077391)
Complained about who to whom?
|
Thank you, I hadn’t thought of it that way.
Regardless of the reason, loss of AA is a decrease (some might write devaluation) of Bilt’s perks which supports some people’s contention that Bilt is not sustainable, albeit not for the reasons I originally embraced the Bilt unsustainable theory. |
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 36077330)
Scroll back to 677 to read earlier report and discussion. I think we will see more of this as the airlines come to see Bilt as a "credit card" partner rather than as a "rent rewards" program. I imagine that Barclays and Citi complained, and I expect that Chase is also complaining.
Bilt is far more known now compared to when the AA partnership launched three years ago; much of that undoubtedly is due to them moving the cobrand card from an unknown issuer to WF. AA is also allegedly in the process of renegotiating their contacts with Citi and Barclays, so there are a lot of moving parts on their end right now. AA of course has made it clear they want to increase their cobrand card spend, so they have an incentive to force people onto their cobrand cards. And eliminating a competitor to Citi and Barclays may also help AA extract more value for themselves from the upcoming renewal agreements. |
Given that for most people, Bilt has essentially no sign-up bonus and churning it is useless, I'd presume the impact on transfer bonuses to AA and other transfer partners is vastly lower than other cards in circulation.
|
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
(Post 36077513)
Thank you, I hadn’t thought of it that way.
Regardless of the reason, loss of AA is a decrease (some might write devaluation) of Bilt’s perks which supports some people’s contention that Bilt is not sustainable, albeit not for the reasons I originally embraced the Bilt unsustainable theory. That wouldn't support the idea that Bilt is unsustainable. And whether you believe it or not, Bilt has claimed that they are already profitable (not really sure I believe it, at least without some accounting sleight of hand). |
Originally Posted by Smiley90
(Post 36077809)
Given that for most people, Bilt has essentially no sign-up bonus and churning it is useless, ….
There’s a dearth of evidence and/or statistics regarding the number or percentage of new Bilt cardmembers who get the quasi-SUB and regarding churning Bilt MC. Based on following this thread very carefully for the past year and my extensive research for an accurate and thorough Wikipost, my estimation at this time is that most people do receive the quasi-SUB offer. Please refer us to available datapoints regarding Bilt quasi-SUB and churning Bilt MC. |
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
(Post 36078604)
(My medical career spanned the time from “it makes sense and that’s the way we’ve always done it” to “evidence based medicine”, I now view many things that same new way.) Agree that absent a SUB, churning is pointless.
There’s a dearth of evidence and/or statistics regarding the number or percentage of new Bilt cardmembers who get the quasi-SUB and regarding churning Bilt MC. Based on following this thread very carefully for the past year and my extensive research for an accurate and thorough Wikipost, my estimation at this time is that most people do receive the quasi-SUB offer. Please refer us to available datapoints regarding Bilt quasi-SUB and churning Bilt MC. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.