Community
Wiki Posts
Search

787

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 8:39 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DCA
Programs: UA 1MM Gold, Hhonors Gold, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 553
787

Any predictions or thoughts as to what routes (new or old) Continental is going to fly its 787s?
AND
Do you think the plane is going to have an upgraded BF cabin? Qantas' new A380 is going to have first suites, 180 degree business class seats, and a new premium economy section.
flying for gold elite is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 8:55 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PVD
Programs: Priority Club Plat
Posts: 12,312
CO has been very tight-lipped about routes or new BF products on the 787. Only thing we know is that it's most likely to have 9-abreast seating, not 8, in coach.

There are quite a few threads here that will answer your questions. Here's one from a few months back. No new information since, so those are still valid:

http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=657463

Note that in Northwest's recent application for its China routes, they explicit say that if they win DTW-PVG in 2007, they'll start with a 744 but shift to a 788 when they arrive.

CO did not say anything at all about the 787 in its EWR-PVG application.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 10:14 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IAH
Posts: 23
787 Bf

Larry was actually attending meetings about this very subject today. I suspect that more information about BF details will be available within the next few weeks.

A Boeing executive gave an awesome presentation to some CO management employees this morning. Check out
http://www.newairplane.com/

This Boeing site highlights some of the best features of the 787 and it also offers a list of all carriers which have ordered the 787 to date and lists some delivery dates.
kinpmartins is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 11:25 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,540
Originally Posted by rkkwan
CO has been very tight-lipped about routes or new BF products on the 787. Only thing we know is that it's most likely to have 9-abreast seating, not 8, in coach.
Do you know what this will translate into in terms of actual seat width reductions? And how this compares to the existing Continental fleet.
Lurker1999 is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 11:57 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,866
Originally Posted by Lurker1999
Do you know what this will translate into in terms of actual seat width reductions? And how this compares to the existing Continental fleet.
The inside cabin width of the 787 is about 16 inches more narrow than the 777, which has 9 across in coach. It would be about the same comfort as 10 across on the 777 instead of 9 across. The 787's better lighting, larger windows and smell of a new aircraft will make up for the crammed seat width.
BF263533 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 1:15 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by BF263533
The inside cabin width of the 787 is about 16 inches more narrow than the 777, which has 9 across in coach. It would be about the same comfort as 10 across on the 777 instead of 9 across. The 787's better lighting, larger windows and smell of a new aircraft will make up for the crammed seat width.
16 inches is slightly less than the width of an average coach seat.

If CO is really contemplating putting 9 across on the 787, this would mean that the coach seat would be about 1.78 inches narrower, or about 15.5 inches wide. That seems hard to believe, frankly. Currently, the narrowest coach seat in long haul coach is 16.5 inches on ANA.

Of course, they could also have narrower aisles, but there is a limit to how narrow the aisles can be, and very narrow aisles also contribute to discomfort.

Can you imagine your trip halfway arounf the world on the state-of-the-art CO 787 with its 15.5 inch wide seats and 31 seat pitch?

Slightly bigger windows and better lighting cannot make that a pleasant experience.

Last edited by TWA Fan 1; Aug 9, 2007 at 1:23 am
TWA Fan 1 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 3:34 am
  #7  
RNE
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: JZRO
Posts: 9,175
Originally Posted by flying for gold elite
Any predictions or thoughts as to what routes (new or old) Continental is going to fly its 787s?
I think CLE-CAK is a good bet.
RNE is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 5:20 am
  #8  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott LT Titanium
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by TWA Fan 1
If CO is really contemplating putting 9 across on the 787, this would mean that the coach seat would be about 1.78 inches narrower, or about 15.5 inches wide. That seems hard to believe, frankly. Currently, the narrowest coach seat in long haul coach is 16.5 inches on ANA.
Your calculations aren't quite right. The default (ie 8 across) configuration uses 18.5" seats. The 9-across configuration can be done with 17.2" seats. Which is obviously the same as is currently found on all CO 737 and 757 planes. Of course, it's a downgrade from the 17.9" seats of the widebodies.
grizzly is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 6:31 am
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
FWIW searching 787* yeilded the following results:...maybe the mods consider consolidating some of these threads together.
J.Edward is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 6:34 am
  #10  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by grizzly
The 9-across configuration can be done with 17.2" seats. Which is obviously the same as is currently found on all CO 737 and 757 planes. Of course, it's a downgrade from the 17.9" seats of the widebodies.
A sardine can is a sardine can - no matter what the number (737 or 787). I am amazed how people (myself included) get excited about a new plane. At the end of the day we all are going to be stuffed in 17.9" x 32" space for 10 hours (I'm being optimistic - CO may decide to do 31" pitch like in 777.)
NYC_747 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 6:43 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by grizzly
Your calculations aren't quite right. The default (ie 8 across) configuration uses 18.5" seats. The 9-across configuration can be done with 17.2" seats. Which is obviously the same as is currently found on all CO 737 and 757 planes. Of course, it's a downgrade from the 17.9" seats of the widebodies.
Fair enough. I was basing my calculations on the figure that the 787 fuselage is 16 " narrower than the 777.

Question: Where do the 16 extra inches in 777 go if it also has 9 across in Y?

Nevertheless, 17.2" seats will not be comfortable on any long-haul, and the 787 will clearly do some very long-haul flights.

It's simply another step in Larry Kellner's campaign to make coach as uncomfortable as he can get away with. I'm curious to see if see if CO moves down to 30 inch seat pitch on the 787's.
TWA Fan 1 is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 7:06 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DCA
Programs: Kommissar Giga-Posting Direktor, PWP; Fasano Nouveau Aristocrat; CO Platinum; BD Gold; MR Gold
Posts: 18,733
Originally Posted by BF263533
The 787's better lighting, larger windows and smell of a new aircraft will make up for the crammed seat width.
LOL! (That was a joke, right?)
CO 1E is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 7:12 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DCA
Programs: Kommissar Giga-Posting Direktor, PWP; Fasano Nouveau Aristocrat; CO Platinum; BD Gold; MR Gold
Posts: 18,733
Originally Posted by TWA Fan 1
16 inches is slightly less than the width of an average coach seat.

If CO is really contemplating putting 9 across on the 787, this would mean that the coach seat would be about 1.78 inches narrower, or about 15.5 inches wide. That seems hard to believe, frankly. Currently, the narrowest coach seat in long haul coach is 16.5 inches on ANA.
Also, let us not forget the possbility of innovative seating (such as that designed by Thompson Solutions and others) that could allow nine accross without a reduction in seat width.
CO 1E is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 7:30 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A festering pit; a pustule of a fistula set athwart the miasmic swamps of the armpit of the Gulf of Mexico - a Godforsaken wart upon a dark crevasse of the World. (IAH)
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold, BA Silver, Marriott Lifetime Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold
Posts: 31,403
Originally Posted by CO 1E
Also, let us not forget the possbility of innovative seating (such as that designed by Thompson Solutions and others) that could allow nine accross without a reduction in seat width.
One can always hope. Have those seats been certified by the FAA for evacuation purposes, or whatever the heck it is that the FAA considers when certifying seats?
Anglo Large Clawed Otter is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 7:35 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 2MM 1K
Posts: 16,591
Maybe...

They're cramming in 9 across to put more space between rows? I'd gladly give up an inch for about 3 more between seats. Too early for math, but eliminating approximantely every 9th row by stuffing those seats into remaining rows yields 31"(?) or about 3 1/2 inches extra legroom per re-positioned row and maybe a little more seat recline. Just dreaming here...
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.