![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13008583)
In the grand scheme of things it is probably less resource intensive to send the real card or at least on par with the e-Card.
It's hard to quantify the electronic stuff. Servers that hold the card, people's computers that send the card, receive the card, etc. plus the buildings that house the server rooms. It is like plug-in electric cars, it's still burning fossil fuels just not in its own engine. |
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008603)
- sigh -
Let's not start talking about energy now. Please. |
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008603)
- sigh -
Let's not start talking about energy now. Please. @:-) - exhibit A, this is a lightbulb, it takes energy. It's emoticon has a smiley in it, therefore it is fun. Wow, no wonder I aced my Logic class. :D |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13008583)
In the grand scheme of things it is probably less resource intensive to send the real card or at least on par with the e-Card.
Tree --> Pulp --> Paper Ink --> Printing Card --> boxed Boxes of cards --> Distributed to warehouse --> POS Person buys card, brings home Person mails card. Mailbox --> mail carrier --> post office --> sorting facility ---> depending on distance, other sorting facilities --> recipients post office --> mail delivery vehicle --> person receives card. Person :rolleyes: at card, displays on mantel --> person throws away card --> card sent to recycling facility. End of life. I know sending an e-card isn't as simple as firing up the ol' crashputer and ordering a TAB, but in terms of energy and resources, it's not even close. |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13008611)
Come on man, it's fun. ;)
@:-) - exhibit A, this is a lightbulb, it takes energy. It's emoticon has a smiley in it, therefore it is fun. Wow, no wonder I aced my Logic class. :D ttp://ak.imgag.com/imgag/product/preview/flash/pdShell.swf?ihost=http://ak.imgag.com/imgag&brandldrPath=/product/full/el/&cardNum=/product/full/ap/3173936/graphic1 |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 13008546)
Quick question re weather waivers for the group. I had a trip that was interrupted due to snow in BWI. I am sitting on a SEA-BWI half of a ticket. I called in to assign it to a new date and was told that I have to pay a fare difference even though it is the same bucket. Does that sound normal?
I was always under the impression that the same bucket meant if was gratis. |
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 13008611)
Come on man, it's fun.
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 13008608)
ok let's talk about Maurice Strong instead...he is a shyster.
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008628)
Really? Take a step back and think about that one for a minute.
Tree --> Pulp --> Paper Ink --> Printing Card --> boxed Boxes of cards --> Distributed to warehouse --> POS Person buys card, brings home Person mails card. Mailbox --> mail carrier --> post office --> sorting facility ---> depending on distance, other sorting facilities --> recipients post office --> mail delivery vehicle --> person receives card. I know sending an e-card isn't as simple as firing up the ol' crashputer and ordering a TAB, but in terms of energy and resources, it's not even close. |
Boy, I stepped away for 10 minutes, and I see that I started something. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008641)
Sure, its fun. But I deal with it 9-5 M-F. I come to the Box to escape it.
Dirty Canuck. :mad::mad::rolleyes::mad: Yep he is a dirty canuck, somehow I knew you'd bring it all around. |
Originally Posted by Steph3n
(Post 13008649)
It is hard to quantify exactly how many megawatts that one card costs in power, but I know our facility uses 4 megawatts almost continually...
Yeah, the energy life-cycle of a card is probably in the watts range, not the MW when you amortize out the utilization of the equipment. If all that was done for just one card, I wouldn't be vacationing in the Maldives next summer. Or, if I was, I'd better get my Scuba cert. @:-) |
Originally Posted by Trustguy
(Post 13008651)
Boy, I stepped away for 10 minutes, and I see that I started something. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008628)
Really? Take a step back and think about that one for a minute.
Tree --> Pulp --> Paper Ink --> Printing Card --> boxed Boxes of cards --> Distributed to warehouse --> POS Person buys card, brings home Person mails card. Mailbox --> mail carrier --> post office --> sorting facility ---> depending on distance, other sorting facilities --> recipients post office --> mail delivery vehicle --> person receives card. I know sending an e-card isn't as simple as firing up the ol' crashputer and ordering a TAB, but in terms of energy and resources, it's not even close. Your point is well taken, but again the variables are too hard to quantify. Server rooms are always running, web providers are always running and both of those require enormous amounts of energy. Then, do you take into account the fact that it took energy to lay the fiber between hubs? And you see where this discussion devolves. Anyway, I am not an e-card person, just send me an e-mail if you're going to send an e-card. At least my chances of getting a virus from some random link on my Windows computer go down. Let's not forget that it actually takes someone some time to write a note, a real note, in pen, on a card. I think there is value in that. |
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008603)
- sigh -
Let's not start talking about energy now. Please. |
Originally Posted by belynch
(Post 13008665)
Define your facility.
Yeah, the energy life-cycle of a card is probably in the watts range, not the MW when you amortize out the utilization of the equipment. If all that was done for just one card, I wouldn't be vacationing in the Maldives next summer. Or, if I was, I'd better get my Scuba cert. @:-) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 pm. |
|
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.