Current China Entry policy
#1231
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
More flight war.....
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
Let's see if China retaliates by suspending UA/AA/DL flights.
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
Let's see if China retaliates by suspending UA/AA/DL flights.
#1232
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM
Posts: 6,425
More flight war.....
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
#1233
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Yikes!
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
From DOT point of view, the U.S. doesn't care China cancels flights by Chinese carriers. It's China's prerogative. But DOT is not happy that China suspends flights by US carriers in some arbitrary matter. You can't even verify their claim of positive cases....
#1234
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,710
Yikes!
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
Last edited by STS-134; Jan 21, 2022 at 6:15 pm
#1235
Join Date: Aug 2021
Programs: UA 1MM
Posts: 351
US should require all PRC citizens to fly directly to the US from the PRC, suspend all visas issued to PRC citizens, and only recognize US visas issued after March 2020 (and revoke all visas issued after March 2020 that weren't issued for humanitarian reasons). And this should continue until the stupidity stops on the PRC side. Because reciprocity.
#1236
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
I suspect that may not offend the Chinese government much, if at all. They've been trying to minimize the number of international departures in addition to arrivals (e.g. deliberately slowing down passport issuance and renewal), under the assumption that each departure is a future arrival, and each arrival is an infection risk.
There are so many kids/relatives of PRC high ranking officials in the U.S.
They have bank accounts, luxury cars. real estates etc. in the U.S.
Remember, No.1 demand they made when meeting with US Secretary of State?
"Lifting U.S. visa restrictions on CCP members".
#1237
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,710
The Chinese government does care.
There are so many kids/relatives of PRC high ranking officials in the U.S.
They have bank accounts, luxury cars. real estates etc. in the U.S.
Remember, No.1 demand they made when meeting with US Secretary of State?
"Lifting U.S. visa restrictions on CCP members".
There are so many kids/relatives of PRC high ranking officials in the U.S.
They have bank accounts, luxury cars. real estates etc. in the U.S.
Remember, No.1 demand they made when meeting with US Secretary of State?
"Lifting U.S. visa restrictions on CCP members".
#1238
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 101
The Chinese government does care.
There are so many kids/relatives of PRC high ranking officials in the U.S.
They have bank accounts, luxury cars. real estates etc. in the U.S.
Remember, No.1 demand they made when meeting with US Secretary of State?
"Lifting U.S. visa restrictions on CCP members".
There are so many kids/relatives of PRC high ranking officials in the U.S.
They have bank accounts, luxury cars. real estates etc. in the U.S.
Remember, No.1 demand they made when meeting with US Secretary of State?
"Lifting U.S. visa restrictions on CCP members".
Your hyperbole doesn't help your argument either. "No. 1 demand"... yeah right.
I think the government is under tremendous pressure to keep Omicron in check given how widespread it is overseas, esp given the coming Olympics. The number of positive cases are taxing the quarantine/isolation system. They're probably happy flights are suspended until 3/31
#1239
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,243
Cancel the visas of all CCP members and their families. If they're currently in the US, and they leave, they do not come back. Enrolled in school in the US? Too bad. Go complain to your mother or father and make them remove the idiotic restrictions on US citizens or the zero visa policy for CCP members and their families stays in place.
Zero Covid is 100% political at this point but I dont think cutting off your nose to spite your face is a good response for the USA.
#1240
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CA, FL, and China.
Programs: UA1K (no longer serviced!), Bonvoy P, Hyatt G
Posts: 704
More flight war.....
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
Let's see if China retaliates by suspending UA/AA/DL flights.
Biden administration is suspending basically ALL flights to the U.S. by Chinese carriers from now to March 31.
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-...-idUSL1N2U11UW
Let's see if China retaliates by suspending UA/AA/DL flights.
#1241
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,710
Yikes!
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
I mean, this news seems to be retaliatory action; from what I can tell. China had their reasons for suspension pretty clearly laid out:
"Don't fly a plane full of Covid-19 positive passengers to China, and you can continue to fly (at a reduced rate)."
As harsh and annoying as that strategy may be, I tend to agree here with "Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington," who "said Friday the policy for international passenger flights entering China has been applied equally to Chinese and foreign airlines in a fair, open and transparent way.": 4 out of the nine flights that were recently suspended WERE Chinese carrier flights.
This appears as if the two opposing parties are of unequal intellect, and the USA being the unreasonable one here, IMO.
Schools in the USA rely on the money Chinese students bring in to fund many things that benefit American students and teachers at those schools.
Zero Covid is 100% political at this point but I dont think cutting off your nose to spite your face is a good response for the USA.
Zero Covid is 100% political at this point but I dont think cutting off your nose to spite your face is a good response for the USA.
#1242
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Complete bull. Hey why don't we have an identical policy for the US except let's have a group that is majority owned by AA, DL, and UA do the testing, and have the power to suspend CA, MU, and CZ flights based on the results of those tests. What could possibly go wrong here?!? Because look at who owns a majority stake in CA, CZ, and MU.
You know how much money the US has spent fighting COVID-19? What fraction of that money would have to be directed to universities to make up for the "lost" revenue? 1%?
You know how much money the US has spent fighting COVID-19? What fraction of that money would have to be directed to universities to make up for the "lost" revenue? 1%?
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...ised-to-hit-6t
On March 10, 2021, it was reported that US spending on COVID relief hit 6 Trillion USD. The total should be even more now.
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/0...united-states/
There are 372,000 Chinese students in the US. It is estimated that their tuition fees and living expenses contributed US$16 billion in 2019.
Even if all these students return to China, the $16 billion spending is about 0.4% of 6 trillion on COVID relief in the US.
Let's put things in perspective.
#1243
Join Date: Jan 2020
Programs: Marriott Platinum (Lifetime Gold), Caesars Diamond
Posts: 1,413
The visa reciprocity issue is completely separate than the flight cancellations issue.
Visa reciprocity is probably a more effective tool than cancelling flights. China clearly doesnt care about anyone (even their own citizens) outside the country.
But if overseas Chinese citizens have their visas cancelled and their flights back to the mainland are cancelled, well now they have a problem.
Visa reciprocity is probably a more effective tool than cancelling flights. China clearly doesnt care about anyone (even their own citizens) outside the country.
But if overseas Chinese citizens have their visas cancelled and their flights back to the mainland are cancelled, well now they have a problem.
#1244
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,710
Or less than 1%.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...ised-to-hit-6t
On March 10, 2021, it was reported that US spending on COVID relief hit 6 Trillion USD. The total should be even more now.
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/0...united-states/
There are 372,000 Chinese students in the US. It is estimated that their tuition fees and living expenses contributed US$16 billion in 2019.
Even if all these students return to China, the $16 billion spending is about 0.4% of 6 trillion on COVID relief in the US.
Let's put things in perspective.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...ised-to-hit-6t
On March 10, 2021, it was reported that US spending on COVID relief hit 6 Trillion USD. The total should be even more now.
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/0...united-states/
There are 372,000 Chinese students in the US. It is estimated that their tuition fees and living expenses contributed US$16 billion in 2019.
Even if all these students return to China, the $16 billion spending is about 0.4% of 6 trillion on COVID relief in the US.
Let's put things in perspective.
The zero COVID policy may be popular with the public, and for people who don't travel overseas, the inconveniences are only theoretical. Even people who do have family members traveling overseas or who do so themselves might be willing to put up with quarantine to try to keep COVID out. But once it starts affecting their ability to see their family members at all and or starts hitting their pocketbooks (i.e. by requiring them to fly directly from the PRC to the US and pay the exorbitant prices of those airfares), that's when it starts to hit home. So the US should start turning those levers and make it as painful as possible for the people who come up with these policies.
#1245
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 101
The zero COVID policy may be popular with the public, and for people who don't travel overseas, the inconveniences are only theoretical. Even people who do have family members traveling overseas or who do so themselves might be willing to put up with quarantine to try to keep COVID out. But once it starts affecting their ability to see their family members at all and or starts hitting their pocketbooks (i.e. by requiring them to fly directly from the PRC to the US and pay the exorbitant prices of those airfares), that's when it starts to hit home. So the US should start turning those levers and make it as painful as possible for the people who come up with these policies.