Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

How will TSA respond to FLL baggage claim shooting?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How will TSA respond to FLL baggage claim shooting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2017, 11:42 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
I agree with Chollie & Petaluma. No additional fees and no escorting to their car. The firearm is locked in a box with only the owner/traveler having the key. I don't mind the idea of having to pickup at a baggage office to verify identity of transporter but it ends there. This is an airport security matter, not a TSA matter. Security can verify the correct person is getting the package and then the person can leave the airport.

It's about limiting risks while being free, not completely eliminating risk and being drones.

Originally Posted by chollie
Nope. I am totally against your suggestions, particularly the idea of additional fees.

It's complete overkill that will only impose greater burdens and inconvenience on innocent people while doing nothing to actually stop nutters looking to wreak havoc. The most it will do is temporarily inconvenience a nutter.
Originally Posted by petaluma1
The passenger who correctly and legally checks a weapon has a key to the locked box that contains the gun. No one else has the key to open the box so it's very unlikely that a stranger could take the bag and have access to the gun in a timely manner.
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 11:53 am
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,131
Originally Posted by jb_in_ma
I don't recall reading if he was still active military, but if he is and had a military ID or DoD CAC, the answer is probably 'yes.'
Less than honorable discharge.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 12:38 pm
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,417
Originally Posted by Justin026
The extra step of going into the baggage office seems like it would be easy enough.
There's a problem, though--any such system requires marking the bag containing the firearm. Oops--they have already found that marking gun-containing baggage was a bad idea. (I don't know what prompted this, probably theft.)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 1:08 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
There's a problem, though--any such system requires marking the bag containing the firearm. Oops--they have already found that marking gun-containing baggage was a bad idea. (I don't know what prompted this, probably theft.)
I thought bags with properly checked firearms had a special bag tag so that TSA wouldn't go further bonkers by finding an object that looked suspicious on x-ray/CAT scan.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:18 pm
  #50  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Any reports on whether the shooter got PreCheck on his DL boarding pass this time too?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:22 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
Why would it matter if he got PreCheck? The firearm was not on his person. If anything TSA will use this incident to their own benefit (more financing) and to treat the traveling public like .....

Originally Posted by GUWonder
Any reports on whether the shooter got PreCheck on his DL boarding pass this time too?
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:23 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Originally Posted by JoeBas
"How will TSA respond to FLL baggage claim shooting?"

I heard they responded by running. And screaming.
As opposed to what, giving him a lecture about liquids and gels or patting him down before allowing him to continue on his way? News flash, when someone starts shooting at random, and you don't have a gun, the smartest process you can follow is "run, hide, fight".
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:29 pm
  #53  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by chollie
For those advocating burdensome requirements for arriving pax with checked firearms, keep in mind that unless TSA completely dropped the ball, like all other pax checking firearms, this guy got special attention in Alaska when he checked in. He had to declare his firearm and provide TSA with access to the bag before he actually surrendered it to the airlines.

He didn't set off any alarms there, and we are talking a part of the country where folks with firearms is not a rare and unusual sight.
Given how lousy the TSA BDO/profiling thing is, I can't say we should expect any better by having airline or airline-contracted ground handling (inclusive of baggage claim) agents engaging in that kind of behavior to determine if a licensed gun owner claiming back their property is completely mentally competent, a terrorist or something else at the time of recovering their property. Giving the employees of airlines and airline contractors more opportunities to go on power-trips and act out on their prejudices is a recipe for more problems than solutions.

I'm very curious if he got PreCheck on his DL boarding pass for this trip. It would be yet another sign of how foolish the profiling element of PreCheck determinations really is.

Given the shooters name and birthdate is known, people can book a refundable DL ticket and check in online to see the result. It might be a fascinating outcome again before the government shuts it down from being repeated.
Originally Posted by Yoshi212
Why would it matter if he got PreCheck?
Because it speaks to the point that the TSA "trusted traveler" determination scheme is but another exercise in profiling that flops.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:36 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
I don't think there will be a rush of changes from TSA, or a serious revamping of the process. There may be small changes, increased patrols by local LEOs or increased staffing for LEOs. TSA is not truly involved in the security protocols for the checked baggage areas, that is usually the purview of the local LEOs.

The anti gun crowd will use this to push for stricter laws regarding firearms, or the outright removal of firearms from everyone.

The pro gun crowd will use this to push for better laws regarding the open carry/concealed carry of firearms for everyone.

The best response to this situation is to examine how someone that had as many run-ins with LEOs as this gentleman did, and had as many mental challenges as he (apparently) does, gets to the place where he can shoot this happens. Someone, somewhere in the process leading to this senseless situation should have been able to recognize the mental illness ahead of time. Once we examine how all these signs were missed, we can then begin to formulate a path forward, to try and make sure we get people with similar challenges the treatment they need in order to prevent future tragedies of this nature.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:37 pm
  #55  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by gsoltso
As opposed to what, giving him a lecture about liquids and gels or patting him down before allowing him to continue on his way? News flash, when someone starts shooting at random, and you don't have a gun, the smartest process you can follow is "run, hide, fight".
With that approach, it sounds like the TSA really shouldn't have been pretending as if it's on the front line in a war against some terrorists.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 4:00 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
While I do see your point I don't want to draw attention to anything that will make the TSA take away traveling without a freedom groping. The PreCheck experience should be the traveling standard with scanning/groping on either a computerized random selection and/or if someone triggers a swab, WTMD or baggage scan, but that is hoping for too much in the anything in the name of security world we live in.

Originally Posted by GUWonder
Because it speaks to the point that the TSA "trusted traveler" determination scheme is but another exercise in profiling that flops.
^
I don't blame TSOs for running or hiding but they need to back down from the frontline fighting terrorists scam.
Originally Posted by GUWonder
With that approach, it sounds like the TSA really shouldn't have been pretending as if it's on the front line in a war against some terrorists.
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 4:03 pm
  #57  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
Originally Posted by gsoltso
As opposed to what, giving him a lecture about liquids and gels or patting him down before allowing him to continue on his way? News flash, when someone starts shooting at random, and you don't have a gun, the smartest process you can follow is "run, hide, fight".
I believe an unarmed school employee at Sandy Hook was vilified for allegedly running and hiding. The rest of her unarmed co-workers assumed leadership roles and tried to guide the children to safety.

Any FA who elbowed pax out of the way to escape an attack during a flight would be condemned.

I don't think it's inappropriate to expect 'academy'-trained TSA employees to perform as responsibly as unarmed elementary school employees with no 'academy' training - particularly when such a high percentage are allegedly veterans with military experience and training in addition to their 'academy' training.
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 4:34 pm
  #58  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,654
Exclamation Moderator's Note:

Comments that are political in nature and do not directly relate to TSA functions and responsibilites, and airport security are better left for OMNI/PR.

There is are two active threads there discussing this incident:
Posts have been deleted.

Thank you,

TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
TWA884 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 6:38 pm
  #59  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by jb_in_ma
I don't recall reading if he was still active military, but if he is and had a military ID or DoD CAC, the answer is probably 'yes.'

I think it was a reservist.
Martina70 is offline  
Old Jan 8, 2017, 12:33 am
  #60  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by jb_in_ma
I don't recall reading if he was still active military, but if he is and had a military ID or DoD CAC, the answer is probably 'yes.'
He had some more recent Alaskan employment history with a private security company, a place he went to years after his Iraq service.

Those in the National Guard are often getting PreCheck for years after leaving. But he had been released from that too.

Last edited by GUWonder; Jan 8, 2017 at 4:07 am
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.