Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Sequester Security Nightmare?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 9:55 am
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by Pup7
Mostly because anyone who can is going to avoid air travel like the Plague this weekend, not because there are fewer TSA people around. The ensuing commotion may only present greater opportunity for deception.
Apparently no one has passed the memo to those on my flights tomorrow. I can barely get a middle seat in the back.
tkey75 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 9:58 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by dimramon
I wonder if Detroit was "practicing" yesterday. Only one lane open when I went through security yesterday.
However, I don't think they had a lack of people. They had one screener hovering at the entrance to the regular security line to check boarding passes, and they had about 3 of them hovering around the document checker.
This also is the one airport where I have never seen them use the WTMD for the general public.
When I arrived home at BNA last night about 5, the lines were backed up to the ticketing area. This is very unusual for BNA. I should have stopped to take a few photos but I did not think about it until I was on the shuttle to the car.

BNA is one of those airports that has been a problem for photographers. Every time I get back from a trip and pass security. I think about stopping and taking a few photos to see if they will call the cops and have me removed from flying that day.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 12:41 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Alexandria, Va. USA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, DL Silver, UA Gold, *A Gold, OW Emerald
Posts: 1,492
I went to the barber shop this morning to get a haircut. There are usually five barbers. Today only four. I am feeling the pinch already.
Orion is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 6:40 pm
  #64  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold Royal Air Maroc OW Emerald Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 22,531
The sky is falling, the sky is falling. It took 30 seconds today to clear DEN Pre-Check instead of the usual 20 seconds.
SFO777 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 7:11 pm
  #65  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,688
My guess is we see an uptick in gate ID checks, random silliness, more two-by-two busy work mall walking patrols and less lanes opened merely as a political ploy, with no true reduction in staffing.

One cable television news report stated that sequestration would put a hiring freeze on TSA and they'd be out 1,000 clerks come Memorial Day, Bravo I say!!! A small step for TSA a giant leap for travelers.

Last edited by Ysitincoach; Mar 1, 2013 at 8:38 pm
Ysitincoach is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 10:03 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The lower of the two Carolinas
Programs: Former AA Gold, SkyMiles, Hilton HHonors, SPG Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 387
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
you know... for some weird reason, I was reading your post but hearing it
in Jack Nicholson's voice. (Haffa or Col. Jessup, pick one)
Omg that is hilarious. Especially since I'm a girl.

Classic!
Pup7 is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 7:25 am
  #67  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
The one thousand Monkeys randomly hacking at the TSA typewriter came up with this Gem.

[due to sequestration] ...slots for 1,000 security officers to be vacant by Memorial Day and 2,600 vacancies by the end of September.

"With TSA staffing levels decreasing over time, we expect that during busy travel periods wait times exceeding 30 to 40 minutes could double at nearly all of the largest airports," the agency said in a statement.
Source

Where do I begin?

A minor cut in the budget DOUBLES the wait time (halves the throughput). Really?!?!?!

Here's an idea (channeling my inner Spiff)... FIRE THEM ALL*!!!

* - and stop waging war on some drugs too.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 7:49 am
  #68  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Bob was using his Pistole puppet again...

TSA Administrator John Pistole told a House panel Wednesday that the agency stopped training new air marshals armed, undercover officers who fly on planes to thwart terrorists in January. The last class had been trained in September 2011.
These guys are some kind of scary super smart. Due to sequestration, they stopped training FAMs ~18 months ago. Yet the obvious implication is: 1) the sequestration is to blame for the catastrophic mess you are about to experience and 2) we need more money to keep you safe from the onslaught of pure evil (aka wheelchair-bound grandmothers carrying bottled water).

Here's another idea for the TSA, while they are working the details of abolishing the agency....

@:-) Tell the 75% of the clerks that just stand around wasting oxygen to do something productive! (like quit) @:-)


And a final note to the Mods/Admin: [begging] Please, please, please add a puking smiley to the list of smilies. We need one more than we ever have. [/begging]
ScatterX is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 9:03 am
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Alas, the sky did not fall in the night. MCO was business as usual. All lanes open on the B side, mouse-eared sheep filing through as ever.


Of course, I did not look at the A side. It might have been a total mess, shut down even, if all screeners were on my side to comply with the massive staff reductions we were promised (sort of a slip of the tongue to call a screener on my side, but I digress).
tkey75 is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 9:05 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
http://homeland.house.gov/sites/home...orm_Report.pdf

Graph on page 14 shows between 2010 and 2011 the number of airline passengers grew from about 628,000,000 to about 638,000,000. At the same time, the number of FTE screeners grew from 45,000 to just under 48,000.

Seems there is a lot of overage that could be cut.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 9:51 am
  #71  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,132
Originally Posted by petaluma1
http://homeland.house.gov/sites/home...orm_Report.pdf

Graph on page 14 shows between 2010 and 2011 the number of airline passengers grew from about 628,000,000 to about 638,000,000. At the same time, the number of FTE screeners grew from 45,000 to just under 48,000.

Seems there is a lot of overage that could be cut.
Yup, 48,000 FTE employees, to be exact. Part-time + "management" can all go too.
Spiff is online now  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 9:56 am
  #72  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by petaluma1
http://homeland.house.gov/sites/home...orm_Report.pdf

Graph on page 14 shows between 2010 and 2011 the number of airline passengers grew from about 628,000,000 to about 638,000,000. At the same time, the number of FTE screeners grew from 45,000 to just under 48,000.

Seems there is a lot of overage that could be cut.
Sheep don't need no facts and can't do math. @:-)

That's a 6.2% increase in clerks, in one year, to handle a 1.5% increase in traffic. This doesn't account for the massive increases in the rest of the system.

Now they purport the world coming to an end because they might have to live without 2,600 of clerks (0.4%) that they want to hire this FY.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 10:03 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by Spiff
Yup, 48,000 FTE employees, to be exact. Part-time + "management" can all go too.
even if they let all 48000 employees go, I'm sure they won't reduce the salary savings in the budget. they'll just find another way to use the extra money to fund some ridiculous project.

my company laid off a bunch of employees, which was supposed to save 2.5 million over two year. three months later, all the executive restrooms were equipped with Toto automatic toilets. 47 units of Toto's top of the line model that will make any Japanese executive red with envy(exact quote from the contractor who was installing them). Tell me what's wrong with that?
MetricFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 10:12 am
  #74  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,132
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
even if they let all 48000 employees go, I'm sure they won't reduce the salary savings in the budget. they'll just find another way to use the extra money to fund some ridiculous project.

my company laid off a bunch of employees, which was supposed to save 2.5 million over two year. three months later, all the executive restrooms were equipped with Toto automatic toilets. 47 units of Toto's top of the line model that will make any Japanese executive red with envy(exact quote from the contractor who was installing them). Tell me what's wrong with that?
There's a fair bit wrong with that, but that's presumably a private company or a publicly-held company. In either case, public monies aren't being blatantly wasted as they currently are on TSA.
Spiff is online now  
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 12:17 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by MetricFlyer
even if they let all 48000 employees go, I'm sure they won't reduce the salary savings in the budget. they'll just find another way to use the extra money to fund some ridiculous project.

my company laid off a bunch of employees, which was supposed to save 2.5 million over two year. three months later, all the executive restrooms were equipped with Toto automatic toilets. 47 units of Toto's top of the line model that will make any Japanese executive red with envy(exact quote from the contractor who was installing them). Tell me what's wrong with that?
OT, but I can beat that. Company negotiates wage reduction in union contract. The day contract is signed, owners reward management with new leased BMW's delivered to the company parking lot. One year later, out of business.

As to the TSA, certain security and border control functions are exempt from the sequester. This may include parts of the TSA, FAM's for instance.
InkUnderNails is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.