National Opt-Out Day: November 24, 2010
Nov 10, 2010, 4:36 pm
#106
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Nov 10, 2010, 4:39 pm
#107
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: At an airport near you
Posts: 13
Then you can ask for a impartial witness....airline representative, law enforcement, airport police. I don't know if there are cameras in all private screening areas...I would think not because of (Yes, I'm gonna say it ) privacy issues.
Nov 10, 2010, 4:42 pm
#108
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 302
1. No Nudo-Scope, so move to the Crotch Grab line.
2. No Crotch Grab, so move to the Private Screening of the Privates line
That ought to make for a long stinking day...have fun STSO Davis!
Nov 10, 2010, 4:47 pm
#109
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: At an airport near you
Posts: 13
Nov 10, 2010, 4:56 pm
#110
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,419
That (cameras in areas where there is an expectation of privacy, e.g. a room where you undress) is illegal in many, if not all, states.
Nov 10, 2010, 5:51 pm
#111
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AA EXP 2MM, SPG/Marriott PLT
Posts: 275
I bet that's all depends on the legal definition of undress. If the subject in question is only required to partially undress, say allow to keep undies on, then a camera might be allowed.
Nov 10, 2010, 5:58 pm
#112
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 549
You mean like in a department store fitting room? Pretty sure that if any department store was caught with cameras in there, they'd be in very, very serious trouble even though you're expected to keep your underwear on while trying on clothes for sanitary reasons.
Nov 10, 2010, 8:21 pm
#113
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 93
you may as well stop right there... it establishes your credibility -- ZERO -- and renders the rest of whatever you say as mindless propagandistic bloviation.
Our cameras are always rolling. And I don't know exactly how long video is stored but I am positive that it is well over 10days. I have had to review footage that was months old and it was still there.
As far as you "demanding" to see video. I don't think that is possible. That request would have to be made to the proper channels for us to release video footage.
As far as you "demanding" to see video. I don't think that is possible. That request would have to be made to the proper channels for us to release video footage.
Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Nov 12, 2010 at 1:33 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
Nov 10, 2010, 8:42 pm
#114
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,236
Nov 10, 2010, 9:07 pm
#115
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Westjet Platinum, Fairmont Platinum RIP, Accor Gold, Marriott Lifetime Silver, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,296
Wow, even the "religious right" media is picking up this story and putting it at the top of the news page! I gotta admit the article struck a pretty good balance...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=226533
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=226533
Nov 10, 2010, 9:09 pm
#116
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Half the distance to EWR than PHL.
Programs: UA, AA, B6, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG, SPG
Posts: 11,695
To add to the effect on opt-out day to maximize drama, all woman should cry, all men should turn their heads and caugh or look like they are going to deck the clerk, and children should loudly scream "stranger touched me in the naughty spot". Camera crews are always at airports on that day (PHL Terminal A, EWR Terminal B)
Nov 10, 2010, 9:28 pm
#117
Join Date: Jul 2000
Programs: Delta Gold, Delta 1M, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 167
Refuse to enter the "Oven"....
I think if we start referring to these devises as 'ovens' that would put an interesting slant on the protest.....The TSA folks were not thrilled when I told them I would not enter the 'oven'.
Just saying....
Just saying....
Nov 10, 2010, 11:26 pm
#119
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
New twist?
Inspired by the brave women in the ACLU thread I wonder if this is perhaps a better idea:
Skirt but no panties - when does the TSO feel resistance?
If you are brave enough to try it, there will probably be 'evidence' of sexual assault on the gloves.
Skirt but no panties - when does the TSO feel resistance?
If you are brave enough to try it, there will probably be 'evidence' of sexual assault on the gloves.
Last edited by janetdoe; Nov 10, 2010 at 11:41 pm Reason: too gross
Nov 10, 2010, 11:42 pm
#120
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,419
Inspired by the brave women in the ACLU thread I wonder if this is perhaps a better idea:
Skirt but no panties - when does the TSO feel resistance?
If you are brave enough to try it, there will probably be 'evidence' of sexual assault on the gloves.
...mentally counting days to see if I will be menstruating on Nov 24... would that be better or worse?...
Skirt but no panties - when does the TSO feel resistance?
If you are brave enough to try it, there will probably be 'evidence' of sexual assault on the gloves.
...mentally counting days to see if I will be menstruating on Nov 24... would that be better or worse?...