|
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 12936814)
According to these photos the TSOs working at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) are not only above the law but above SOP too.
IIRC, the roll-out of the police-imitation uniforms was completed in 2008 by September 11th (:rolleyes: in itself). And the mandate with those uniforms is that screeners bypass the "security" because of the metal on those badges. The "logic" is rooted in the TSA not wanting the individual screeners losing their badges, even by just putting them in the x-ray machine. There was a a tiff in Denver about the very same thing last year. |
Originally Posted by amejr999
(Post 12936708)
First of all, this is TSA; they'll make up a rule if need be. Within the CFR, I see a few ways they might be able to claim it:
-- 1520.7(l) covers anyone who's ever applied to Clear. -- a perverse reading of 1520.7(j) could potentially be construed to cover this -- anyone who's ever worked for an airline (1520.7(k) or owned an aircraft required to have a security plan (1520.7(c)) Regardless, there is a risk here, at minimum, of there being problems. And I think it's only fair to make sure people are aware of that. |
However, where the FSD has elected to waive TSO rescreening, the FSD must implement random screening of TSOs returning from breaks. |
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 12936697)
If it does, y'all remember I have 3 children at home and make sure if I get nabbed y'all give them a good Christmas. Oh and calm down the wife cuz she will be MAD!!!!
|
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 12936873)
That SOP link might have some dated information. I think that SOP info pre-dates the full roll-out of the police-imitation uniforms.
IIRC, the roll-out of the police-imitation uniforms was completed in 2008 by September 11th (:rolleyes: in itself). And the mandate with those uniforms is that screeners bypass the "security" because of the metal on those badges. The "logic" is rooted in the TSA not wanting the individual screeners losing their badges, even by just putting them in the x-ray machine. There was a a tiff in Denver about the very same thing last year. |
Originally Posted by ND Sol
(Post 12936669)
The SSI warnings may have been "deleted," but otherwise it appears to be the same as the other document. And once again, on the one with the SSI warnings deleted, you can find the SSI hidden behind the black boxes. Someone has violated 49 CFR Part 1520 within the Gov't.
Thanks for finding this. It was deleted and re-entered in Amendment 3 on March 16, 2009 Notice it is openly posted on the FBO website as a Airport Screening Contract Solicitation in Montana. Number: HSTS05-09-R-SPP061 was awarded on Sept 02 ,2009 |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 12936890)
I'm on it!!! I start doing "bag checks", what kind of Christmas presents do your kids want??? ;)
And just in case anyone missed it SATTSO was JOKING. |
Originally Posted by ND Sol
(Post 12936886)
And how often do you think that this actually happens? :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 12936893)
When was the last time you heard of a TSO being randomly screened?
|
To TSOs and other Covered persons.
To TSOs and other Covered persons, it is your duty to report this breach of SSI. Go ahead and ruin a few people's weekend.
|
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 12936908)
The baby will be 5 months old, so anything he can bite or throw up on. The big boy is almost 13 but is still really into Power Rangers, video games, Legos and Bionicles. The girl is 12 and I have no clue what girls like.
And just in case anyone missed it SATTSO was JOKING. And really, does ANYONE know what any woman wants??? |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 12936920)
It used to happen all he time with this older and outdated sop.
|
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 12936873)
That SOP link might have some dated information. I think that SOP info pre-dates the full roll-out of the police-imitation uniforms.
IIRC, the roll-out of the police-imitation uniforms was completed in 2008 by September 11th (:rolleyes: in itself). And the mandate with those uniforms is that screeners bypass the "security" because of the metal on those badges. The "logic" is rooted in the TSA not wanting the individual screeners losing their badges, even by just putting them in the x-ray machine. There was a a tiff in Denver about the very same thing last year. Who can find the SOP regarding frozen LGAs in there???? |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 12936933)
Joking, uh, yes.... Joking.... "wink" passes need your mailing address.
And really, does ANYONE know what any woman wants??? Come on she said we need a vacuum 3 weeks before Christmas, what was I supposed to think? I think I was set up. |
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 12936893)
When was the last time you heard of a TSO being randomly screened?
Before that, yes, it's been a very long time. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.