Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2010, 10:45 am
  #736  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
Originally Posted by bdschobel
Lawsuit? Sure. Good cause? No way. Employers can't get bank records just by stating a good reason. Absent the employee's consent, the employer would need a court order.
There are any number of jobs where the employee would either consent or not get hired.
sethb is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 12:29 am
  #737  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,995
From an update to the events/hearings list it seems something may happen on September 8th:
09/08/2010 9:00 Jury Trial 2-Kevin L Fitzwater Not Docktd
serfty is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 8:16 pm
  #738  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,329
Originally Posted by serfty
From an update to the events/hearings list it seems something may happen on September 8th:
The trials is coming up next week, am I correct? Lets find out who will decide to who found not guilty or guilty as charges against Mr. pmocek. If he will be there at the court on-time. he should have to wake up very early morning. He have go to courthouse in the morning. He will able to eat breakfast first before he will heading to courthouse. We will keep eye on it and if he will figure it out for what he done something wrong against ABQ police department. Maybe if he will eventually to drop all of the charges against Mr. pmocek.
N830MH is online now  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 8:25 pm
  #739  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
No trial September 8, 2010

I received notice today from my attorney that I will not be going to trial on September 8. I'll follow-up here when I have more to report.
pmocek is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 8:34 pm
  #740  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,113
Originally Posted by pmocek
I received notice today from my attorney that I will not be going to trial on September 8. I'll follow-up here when I have more to report.
Just wondering, if the DA knows he has no case perhaps they are doing a waiting game using time to muddy the water.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 10:13 pm
  #741  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,953
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Just wondering, if the DA knows he has no case perhaps they are doing a waiting game using time to muddy the water.
Looks like the state is trying to test the limits of the Sixth Amendment too.
Spiff is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010, 11:39 pm
  #742  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by Spiff
Looks like the state is trying to test the limits of the Sixth Amendment too.
My understanding is that the "speedy trial" almost always works against the defendant and that defense attorneys prefer it if the prosecution drags its feet. The longer the wait for a trial the more likely that evidence (or its chain of custody) will be lost, prosecution witnesses will change their story or forget details, the arresting officer will die, etc.

The downside is that when the prosecution is forced to drop its case because it has no case, there is no opportunity for a pro-liberty precedent to be set.

Last edited by mre5765; Sep 10, 2010 at 5:43 am Reason: change of custody -> chain of custody
mre5765 is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 1:36 am
  #743  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,329
Originally Posted by pmocek
I received notice today from my attorney that I will not be going to trial on September 8. I'll follow-up here when I have more to report.
Why there is no new trials date to be set yet? Please find out for which the specific date is that.
N830MH is online now  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 1:57 am
  #744  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by pmocek
I received notice today from my attorney that I will not be going to trial on September 8. I'll follow-up here when I have more to report.
Is the cause of the delay public-- i.e. who requested it (the Court, the State, you)?
Ari is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 4:44 am
  #745  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Just wondering, if the DA knows he has no case perhaps they are doing a waiting game using time to muddy the water.
I'm wondering what is up too - looks like we're getting close to going on for about a year now.

I don't know how stretched the judges are in ABQ, but we've already had one judge recusal and I question how strong the DA's case is. I presume they've attempted the plea bargain and I wouldn't be surprised if the latest offer was "generous" in an attempt to make this go away.

I'd be interested in knowing what the recusal was all about -- but I suspect it'll come out in due time.

If/when the case is firmly docketed for a jury trial, I would like to travel to ABQ providing my schedule allows for it (which could be hit or miss). Any other FTer's looking at attending?
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 5:19 am
  #746  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,995
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
... If/when the case is firmly docketed for a jury trial, I would like to travel to ABQ providing my schedule allows for it (which could be hit or miss). Any other FTer's looking at attending?
Hmmm ... perhaps only on flexible fares ...
serfty is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 6:07 am
  #747  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
If/when the case is firmly docketed for a jury trial, I would like to travel to ABQ providing my schedule allows for it (which could be hit or miss). Any other FTer's looking at attending?
I have family in Albuquerque and would be very happy to combine a visit with attendance at this trial (if there ever is one).

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 9:16 am
  #748  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
I need a lawyer to comment on this question - is it possible for the defense to protest the prosecution dropping a case? I ask because of what mre5765 wrote about the pro-liberty precedent.
Ayn R Key is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 9:24 am
  #749  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by Ayn R Key
I need a lawyer to comment on this question - is it possible for the defense to protest the prosecution dropping a case? I ask because of what mre5765 wrote about the pro-liberty precedent.
Have Phil's two attorneys question the Prosecutor's manhood. Goldwater did that to Johnson after the Gulf of Tonkin incident, otherwise Johnson would have let it slide.
IslandBased is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010, 9:38 am
  #750  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by IslandBased
Have Phil's two attorneys question the Prosecutor's manhood. Goldwater did that to Johnson after the Gulf of Tonkin incident, otherwise Johnson would have let it slide.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged -- the escalation was already in the works, with planning going back to the Kennedy administration. They just needed an excuse.
MikeMpls is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.