![]() |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 36914331)
Oops! 😬 Really?! Could have sworn that I read that it was in the 2000s.
Kindly allow me to clarify that the lifetime proposition was removed following the re-launch of The Marco Polo Club on 01 February 1999, and we have positioned the Diamond Tier as the top tier of The Club since. There will not be any new Lifetime members as the benefits of the previous Lifetime membership have been closely aligned with those of the current Diamond Tier. We appreciate there is a group of members like yourself who have been with The Club for many years with the objective of qualifying for a Lifetime membership in the near future and do understand your disappointment with the removal of this proposition. However, please be assured that we do value your loyalty and will be more than happy to assist you in any enquiries or concerns you may have in regard with your current Club membership. |
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36916173)
I have an email from CX dated 5 September 2001 which says:
|
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36916173)
I have an email from CX dated 5 September 2001 which says:
|
Originally Posted by VE105
(Post 36916513)
Were you invited to be DM Invitation at that time? Or you was still on your way to lifetime status?
|
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36916580)
As I thought was obvious from the letter, I was on my way, but didn't get there before Lifetime disappeared as a concept. Those that had already made it became "Invitation" Diamond members, which, I believe, effectively maintained their lifetime status.
PS: Yes, I do recall Invitation members (尊請貴賓會員). |
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 36917116)
Would you mind sharing the criteria back then to become lifetime DM? Thanks!
PS: Yes, I do recall Invitation members (尊請貴賓會員). |
Longhaul J seats back then were nowhere close to what it is now so I consider those who qualified to be real road warriors even if they mostly flew premium cabins.
|
Originally Posted by GE90-115B
(Post 36918338)
Longhaul J seats back then were nowhere close to what it is now so I consider those who qualified to be real road warriors even if they mostly flew premium cabins.
|
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36918345)
I used to rather like the long haul cradle seats - as a seat it was far more comfortable than most current J offerings. Even F was still just a bigger cradle seat - it didn't go flat either in the late 90s.
|
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36918345)
I used to rather like the long haul cradle seats - as a seat it was far more comfortable than most current J offerings. Even F was still just a bigger cradle seat - it didn't go flat either in the late 90s.
|
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36918312)
We should ask the (still existing) Invitation members for the definitive answer - I think a couple post here occasionally. I don't have any record, but from memory I think it was something like 1M flight miles on CX, where J counted as 1.5 times and F as 2 times. Back in those days that was quite a lot. With the increase in CX's network and the amount people fly I can see that lifetime would have to be much more than that these days.
I qualified in November 1998 which was the date that Cathay announced as the last one for qualification. I was not aware of the date being extended to later but perhaps that was done to assuage those who came so close. We seem to be pretty rare birds these days. Many Chief Pursers (ISMs) tell me that they have not seen one of us for several months. Recently I was told that by one that she had had to explain what we are to new staff who had not been told or paid any attention during their training. Two of the crew asked to be able to come forward to take a look at me - something like being a rare specimen in a zoo. Aside from that, one could qualify for Diamond membership by flying 80 sectors in J or F during a year to reward folk based in HK whose travel was almost all regional. |
Originally Posted by TomYoung
(Post 36918565)
We seem to be pretty rare birds these days. Many Chief Pursers (ISMs) tell me that they have not seen one of us for several months. Recently I was told that by one that she had had to explain what we are to new staff who had not been told or paid any attention during their training. Two of the crew asked to be able to come forward to take a look at me - something like being a rare specimen in a zoo.
|
Originally Posted by TomYoung
(Post 36918565)
My memory is hazy. Perhaps Old China Hand or another can remember more clearly but I would say it was 2 million credit miles, with Y as x1, J as x1.25 and F as x1.5. In addition one had to have 10 consecutive years of active membership. There were no partners. One could not go away for a couple of years and then continue the route to 10 years. One had to start again.
I qualified in November 1998 which was the date that Cathay announced as the last one for qualification. I was not aware of the date being extended to later but perhaps that was done to assuage those who came so close. We seem to be pretty rare birds these days. Many Chief Pursers (ISMs) tell me that they have not seen one of us for several months. Recently I was told that by one that she had had to explain what we are to new staff who had not been told or paid any attention during their training. Two of the crew asked to be able to come forward to take a look at me - something like being a rare specimen in a zoo. Aside from that, one could qualify for Diamond membership by flying 80 sectors in J or F during a year to reward folk based in HK whose travel was almost all regional. |
Originally Posted by cxwaterboy
(Post 36918610)
To be fair, the number of Lifetime DMs is going down as time passes. I've never met one either. I wonder how many are left.
|
Celebrate when each of them expire and CX is relieved of an onerous obligation?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.