![]() |
Originally Posted by US HK UK flyer
(Post 37051826)
- Swire owns more in Miami than the East hotel actually
- CX is going to DFW without the codeshare on its own flights; it's still beneficial to link up with AA - A350-800 range is over 8000nm so it could make it - I don't believe they did YVR-MIA before, but did YVR-JFK? - For CX DFW, AA did not sell it on their website. I did a little search, and AA always direct me to transit in NRT. I doubt if it might affect. - There is no A350-800. For 900, that's only 8100nm. If I add HKG-JFK and JFK-MIA, that would be 14744km = ~7961nm. There is no buffer for diversion.
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37052021)
Pretty sure pochi means CX can do HKG-YVR-MIA in the same fashion that it did HKG-YVR-JFK in the past, which demonstrates CX can run 5th-freedom flights between Canada and the US.
|
Originally Posted by Isochronous
(Post 37052947)
BUD should be high on the agenda.
|
Originally Posted by pochi
(Post 37052966)
- I didn't notice that. There must be a strong demand inside Swire to head to MIA.
- For CX DFW, AA did not sell it on their website. I did a little search, and AA always direct me to transit in NRT. I doubt if it might affect. - There is no A350-800. For 900, that's only 8100nm. If I add HKG-JFK and JFK-MIA, that would be 14744km = ~7961nm. There is no buffer for diversion. - Just like @ernestnywang said, CX did serve HKG-YVR-JFK before; CX can serve MIA in the same fashion. IIRC, before direct flights, CX served HKG-ANC-YYZ and HKG-YVR-JFK. Currently CX is trying to direct passengers to MIA through DFW. Let’s see if this strategy will work. |
Originally Posted by Reply1984
(Post 37053106)
I would be very surprised if CX launched HKG-YVR-MIA after axing HKG-YVR-JFK.
Currently CX is trying to direct passengers to MIA through DFW. Let’s see if this strategy will work. |
Originally Posted by pochi
(Post 37052966)
- Just like @ernestnywang said, CX did serve HKG-YVR-JFK before; CX can serve MIA in the same fashion. IIRC, before direct flights, CX served HKG-ANC-YYZ and HKG-YVR-JFK.
|
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 37053150)
I think ANC was only a technical stop, and CX did not sell ANC-YYZ or vice versa tickets?
|
Originally Posted by Reply1984
(Post 37053106)
Currently CX is trying to direct passengers to MIA through DFW. Let’s see if this strategy will work.
|
Originally Posted by CX860
(Post 37053330)
That makes a double connection (with one being domestic AA) to go via MIA to Latin America which definitely makes it less attractive. Yes you can go through LAX or DFW for the bigger ports but they don't have the Carribbean/Latin American reach of MIA.
CX could also launch Auckland - Sao Paulo and partner with Air NZ. |
Originally Posted by NZflyer777
(Post 37053337)
depends where as well.
CX could also launch Auckland - Sao Paulo and partner with Air NZ. |
Originally Posted by pochi
(Post 37052966)
- For CX DFW, AA did not sell it on their website. I did a little search, and AA always direct me to transit in NRT. I doubt if it might affect.
- There is no A350-800. For 900, that's only 8100nm. If I add HKG-JFK and JFK-MIA, that would be 14744km = ~7961nm. There is no buffer for diversion. On the A350, my bad! Forgot the 800 was never made. Would MIA be reachable with one of the new orders? |
Originally Posted by CX860
(Post 37053330)
That makes a double connection (with one being domestic AA) to go via MIA to Latin America which definitely makes it less attractive. Yes you can go through LAX or DFW for the bigger ports but they don't have the Carribbean/Latin American reach of MIA.
|
Originally Posted by Reply1984
(Post 37053616)
Then that is the issue of demand between HK and Latin America. I simply do not see where that kind of demand could come from.
|
Originally Posted by US HK UK flyer
(Post 37053686)
Chinese demand as the economy grows closer to LatAm. Eventually this will encompass HK interests as well. The pull away from the US with the tariffs is just accelerating this.
|
Originally Posted by Reply1984
(Post 37053739)
If the demand is mostly from Chinese, then it’s Beijing or Shanghai’s play. This is a matter of geography.
|
Originally Posted by Reply1984
(Post 37053616)
Then that is the issue of demand between HK and Latin America. I simply do not see where that kind of demand could come from.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.