Community
Wiki Posts
Search

HAL are enhancing T5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2014, 1:13 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: not far from MUC
Posts: 6,620
Originally Posted by ginger50
T5 is an airport first and a retail opportunity second.
No, LHR as a whole is really all about retail. With runways.
shorthauldad is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 1:36 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: GGLfL
Posts: 1,129
HAL are enhancing T5

Am I alone in enjoying a browse of Harrods, Ted Baker and Reiss before the flight, having the chance to buy some clothes more cheaply than in town, and being able to buy gifts at Tiffany or Chanel also at cheaper prices and without having to go out shopping. What a drab place or would be if it looked like FRA.
MrSimonR is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 1:45 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: scotland/EDI
Programs: BAEC , M&M , VIRGIN FC , FLYING BLUE
Posts: 1,438
how about a casino ?

ah maybe not.. id probably miss my flight
jacobitetraveller is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 2:06 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
I am not a great airport shopper---just the odd single malt or a bottle of scent but I can see why more shops will work for the owners and some travellers

I was interested to read the comparison with SIN maybe that's why so many from that part of the world just love transiting LHR (or other uk or European airports )
I used to buy whiskey for gifting at LHR regularly, till I found out that the street shops in Chicago sell for less. I pack them in checked bags. Don't have to carry them around making sure the sealed Bag remains sealed etc.

Mumbai like many other airports have duty free shops after you clear IMM. But before Customs. Makes it much easier ! They also precook your order on the outbound from BOM so you just stop, pick up and go .
HMPS is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 2:14 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London
Programs: BAEC, AA, Emirates, Hilton, Hyatt, Taj Hotels
Posts: 2,345
Originally Posted by Calchas
Write to FvdP.
Well I'm afraid that Frank and I have little in common; Frank is all about Afternoon Tea at any and every opportunity which I just see as a another cost cutting enhancement every time it appears. Alternatively, it's a cheap, unimaginative, carb rich option which I just wish they'd bin. I gather they're even now enhancing away the cake in Europe

Frank loves it - Tea at the Ritz is probably OK, but Tea at BA isn't.

Frank, in my mind, just personifies everything that I hate about BA at the moment. Cheap penny pinching at every opportunity.

Thus Frank wouldn't be interested in providing a true 'premium experience' because I'm not at all convinced that he knows what that really means. Have a look at AF, LH, TG, EK, EY, SQ et al Frank.

In reality I'm sure he's a lovely fellow and please don't take this personally.
Betteronacamel is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 3:07 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,477
Originally Posted by ginger50
...Witness the crowded nature of the transfer area.... knocking down a few shops and providing more space for passengers would not occur to an organisation fixated on retail rather that what should be their prime role.... getting passengers to and from aircraft...
I would disagree somewhat with this. I believe it is BA who are most at fault for the capacity problems at connections.

Before T5 opened, HAL removed a spa from next door to Huxley's and installed extra security machines. HAL also removed a store at security south and installed another machine there.

Security has gone from 6 to 12 at south,

And from (8 before opening) 10 to 16 at north.

So BA subsequently added flight after flight after flight to T5, flights moved from LGW, flights moved from T3, flights moved from T1.

I would say there are around 20 to 30% more people using transfers than when T5 originally opened, and that is within BA's control.
xxxxx is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 3:14 pm
  #67  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
I agree with a lot of people. When I travel without lounge access I want:

- Lots of seating
- No trouble finding an outlet
- Wifi (either free, or good quality for pay)
- A selection of places to eat

I have zero interest in shopping except for maybe a newspaper.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 3:16 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: not far from MUC
Posts: 6,620
Originally Posted by MrSimonR
Am I alone in enjoying a browse of Harrods, Ted Baker and Reiss before the flight, having the chance to buy some clothes more cheaply than in town, and being able to buy gifts at Tiffany or Chanel also at cheaper prices and without having to go out shopping.
If retail is so attractive, why not design the terminal with straight "non-retail" routes (security -> lounge -> gates), allowing pax who don't wish to partake in Harrods, Ted Baker, Reiss, Tiffany and Chanel to avoid having to go near them?
shorthauldad is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 3:18 pm
  #69  
V10
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Provincie Antwerpen, Vlaanderen, België
Programs: MUCCI Gold
Posts: 2,512
Originally Posted by xxxxx
I would disagree somewhat with this. I believe it is BA who are most at fault for the capacity problems at connections.

Before T5 opened, HAL removed a spa from next door to Huxley's and installed extra security machines. HAL also removed a store at security south and installed another machine there.

Security has gone from 6 to 12 at south,

And from (8 before opening) 10 to 16 at north.

So BA subsequently added flight after flight after flight to T5, flights moved from LGW, flights moved from T3, flights moved from T1.

I would say there are around 20 to 30% more people using transfers than when T5 originally opened, and that is within BA's control.
I'm not sure about that.

It's not like all those extra flights suddenly turned up at T5 out of thin air.

Well, perhaps they did But they were not unexpected.
V10 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2014, 8:42 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Yorkshire, UK / Pasadena CA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,311
I'm still waiting for a proper explanation why the international>domestic connections fast track was axed, and what compensatory arrangements are being planned. Until that recent dis-improvement is addressed I DO NOT WANT to hear about enhanced retail and leisure opportunities. It's offensive.
fripperies is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2014, 7:55 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 2,284
Originally Posted by Raffles
The LV will be a game changer. I promise you, Asian pax will start switching flights to BA PURELY to be able to access the LV duty free on the way home. That shop will be doing £1m a week within 3 months.
I was a bit skeptical about the £1m number when I first read this thread, but I've just read notes from the Boyd Group Conference on another site. Korean Air reports that the LV Duty-Free shop at ICN does $300K+ in business per DAY. That's a lotta Louis.
AeroWesty is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 12:20 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
The one thing that struck me about T5 is that whilst you are surrounded by shops, at no point are you actually forced to walk through one. Opportunity missed, HAL.

Maybe these enhancements involve plonking another branch of Dixons between passport control and security.
1010101 is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 12:33 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,780
Originally Posted by AeroWesty
I was a bit skeptical about the £1m number when I first read this thread, but I've just read notes from the Boyd Group Conference on another site. Korean Air reports that the LV Duty-Free shop at ICN does $300K+ in business per DAY. That's a lotta Louis.
I don't see why so many are that eager to buy LV,
If they're selling that much a day, then everyone under the sun must own something by LV which therefore makes the brand as common as muck so it's no longer a status symbol or whatever.
xenole is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 12:39 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
Originally Posted by xenole
I don't see why so many are that eager to buy LV,
If they're selling that much a day, then everyone under the sun must own something by LV which therefore makes the brand as common as muck so it's no longer a status symbol or whatever.
And that's exactly what is happening. But it's not going to make a huge amount of difference any time soon, as for every person who moves above LV to more exclusive brands, someone new will enter their target market.
1010101 is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 12:40 am
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by xenole
I don't see why so many are that eager to buy LV,
If they're selling that much a day, then everyone under the sun must own something by LV which therefore makes the brand as common as muck so it's no longer a status symbol or whatever.
Those figures don't reveal the volume or the number of unique customers.

Moreover exclusivity is a more a product of marketing than statistics ...
Calchas is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.