Bizarre and painful new passport restrictions in T5 for hand-baggage travellers
#106
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GVA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, KL/AF Ivory
Posts: 1,878
For immigration purposes into the UK you tend to see signs along the lines "EU, EEA and Switzerland".
Very confusing I know.
#108
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GVA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, KL/AF Ivory
Posts: 1,878
So how is this going to work with pax doing international transit to short-haul at T5, say SFO-LHR-HEL? There isn't a visa desk in flight connections (or at least not one that I have seen). Is it the conformance dragon that is going to do the necessary check? And if so couldn't the conformance dragons letting you into security from landside do the same thing, rather creating yet an additional bottleneck on your way through T5?
#109
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mostly UK
Programs: Mucci Extraordinaire, Hilton Diamond, BA Gold (ex BD)
Posts: 11,209
So how is this going to work with pax doing international transit to short-haul at T5, say SFO-LHR-HEL? There isn't a visa desk in flight connections (or at least not one that I have seen). Is it the conformance dragon that is going to do the necessary check? And if so couldn't the conformance dragons letting you into security from landside do the same thing, rather creating yet an additional bottleneck on your way through T5?
#110
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BA Exec Club Bronze, Hilton Diamond, Virgin Flying Club Red
Posts: 1,257
I recently went to Edinburgh, flew from LTN with EasyJet as they:
a) were cheaper than BA
b) don't charge £20rtn for a reserved seat
c) don't involve using a congested delay-prone airport like LHR.
What I'm saying is that if BA is going to take away the key benefit of flying with hand baggage then the significant time saving associated falls in favour of other carriers.
#111
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: not far from MUC
Posts: 6,620
Many aspects of T5 are a real PITA, so I can completely understand why someone might find "one more minor inconvenience" enough to give up BA@T5 and go elsewhere - particularly for s/h flights.
#112
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
BA's short haul program offers me enough choice of times to get me out and home at convenient times almost every time.
Except for EIN, where I have to take the dreaded FR.
#113
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: not far from MUC
Posts: 6,620
I can (sort of) understand BA loyalty if you live near LHR and so start your journeys there. If you start from an outstation (MUC / FRA / SZG / INN in my case), the advantages are a lot less clear, especially if you're not actually heading for (the western side of) London.
If I need to go MAN, BA would be MUC-LHR-MAN, with the re-screening palaver at T5 after landing from MUC. LH and U2 both offer direct flights to MAN. In my book direct beats indirect almost by default, even without the LHR factor.
LH has several lounges at MUC, U2 flights leave from an gate area with a paid lounge.
#114
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
If I were paying the bill for flights, and being price conscious I guess I would look at it a bit differently.
I can't see that an extra few-minute step is going to change that. It's just another PITA aspect to travelling as a whole.
I completely agree with your comments about transiting though. I would favour a direct flight with someone else over a transit with BA every time, unless I needed the TPs or something.
#116
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,742
I do. I live a fair way from LHR so need to allow plenty of contingency for the journey. Most of the time it isn't needed so lounge access is a big benefit for me.
BA's short haul program offers me enough choice of times to get me out and home at convenient times almost every time.
Except for EIN, where I have to take the dreaded FR.
BA's short haul program offers me enough choice of times to get me out and home at convenient times almost every time.
Except for EIN, where I have to take the dreaded FR.
#117
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,753
#118
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GVA
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL, KL/AF Ivory
Posts: 1,878
Have never understood why self-landing is so complicated at T5. You need a one-way gate and some stairs down to the arrivals level. It doesn't even need a person to do that. After all that's exactly what they do when a flight gets cancelled and they have to land you. They take you to an unused gate open the door and let you walk all the way back to Border Control.
#119
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,992
I have an YYZ-LHR ticket and then an onward separate ticket to MUC just after this new system comes into effect for flights to Germany. Hand baggage only. Where under this new system would I get my U.K. passport checked if I don't go landside and use the Arrivals lounge? I'm arriving in F and continuing on in CE. Would the CCR lounge agent be able to do it?
It won't be done in YYZ because the APIS on that booking has my CDN passport details.
It won't be done in YYZ because the APIS on that booking has my CDN passport details.
#120
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
I have an YYZ-LHR ticket and then an onward separate ticket to MUC just after this new system comes into effect for flights to Germany. Hand baggage only. Where under this new system would I get my U.K. passport checked if I don't go landside and use the Arrivals lounge? I'm arriving in F and continuing on in CE. Would the CCR lounge agent be able to do it?
It won't be done in YYZ because the APIS on that booking has my CDN passport details.
It won't be done in YYZ because the APIS on that booking has my CDN passport details.