FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Avianca | LifeMiles and Amigo (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/avianca-lifemiles-amigo-716/)
-   -   LM F and J routes (and the occasional trick-it) Rebooted v2.0 (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/avianca-lifemiles-amigo/1580174-lm-f-j-routes-occasional-trick-rebooted-v2-0-a.html)

bertheike May 29, 2014 1:58 pm

You are so close to it! But it was not 1/3rd it was 25 % !
as it is "closed" anyhow, I give some examples.
LH BKK-FRA-PVG or TG PAR/LON-BKK-DME
AMA always calculated the distance between origin and destination and the one of the longest leg ! And the distance between origin and destination @ least had to be 25% from the longest leg in the itin !
expl. LH BKK-PVG 1798 miles BKK-FRA 5599 longest leg > 25% = 1400 so this worked ! BKK-FRA-HKG not worked because BKK-HKG is less than 1425 miles ( here HKG-FRA is longer 5699 ).
Same TG CDG-BKK is 5878 LON is 5958
CDG-DME is 1547 and LON-DME is 1586 so this was ok with the 25% ! But even the so close to CDG positioned BRU was not valid !
BRU-BKK is 5762 and BRU-DME is 1409 ( But 25% from 5762 is 1441 ) , so it did not work !
It Looks like AMA set up the distance to over 55 %, but of course not only the distance, also still the layover time has to match !





Originally Posted by WolfvanWeen (Post 22939883)
There used to be an implicit rule which I've corroborated on a number of boomerang options where the distance between origin and destination had to be at least 1/3 the shorter leg, so for instance some destinations at the western and eastern borders of a continent could be used while others more in the middle of that same continent couldn't, when the turnaround point was very far away... This rule only seemed to be applied with prefered airline routings.

Maybe this is part of the Amadeus algorithm?

What I believe happened is they've tightened that rule, so either it's simply a smaller divider or another calculation. Effectively that makes classical boomerangs impossible.

The problem is, given the current availability situation it's nearly impossible to test this. That's why if the Amadeus story holds true we would have a great test bed...

PS the one I spoke about earlier that didn't show up on Amadeus was an unforced boomerang. When we forced it on Amadeus (thanks for the help, GermanTraveller), it appeared. So that would be at least one data point corroborating the idea it could be Amadeus, and it could have to do with forcing the airline...

PPS I love Mozart


AirCanada881 May 29, 2014 2:10 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22945871)
You are so close to it! But it was not 1/3rd it was 25 % !
as it is "closed" anyhow, I give some examples.
LH BKK-FRA-PVG or TG PAR/LON-BKK-DME
AMA always calculated the distance between origin and destination and the one of the longest leg ! And the distance between origin and destination @ least had to be 25% from the longest leg in the itin !
expl. LH BKK-PVG 1798 miles BKK-FRA 5599 longest leg > 25% = 1400 so this worked ! BKK-FRA-HKG not worked because BKK-HKG is less than 1425 miles ( here HKG-FRA is longer 5699 ).
Same TG CDG-BKK is 5878 LON is 5958
CDG-DME is 1547 and LON-DME is 1586 so this was ok with the 25% ! But even the so close to CDG positioned BRU was not valid !
BRU-BKK is 5762 and BRU-DME is 1409 ( But 25% from 5762 is 1441 ) , so it did not work !
It Looks like AMA set up the distance to over 55 %, but of course not only the distance, also still the layover time has to match !

You chaps are quite alright :)

TheBOSman May 29, 2014 2:45 pm

LM F and J routes (and the occasional trick-it) Rebooted v2.0
 
Well, if that is the reason, I'm quite alright with that.

yerffej201 May 29, 2014 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22945871)
You are so close to it! But it was not 1/3rd it was 25 % !
as it is "closed" anyhow, I give some examples.
LH BKK-FRA-PVG or TG PAR/LON-BKK-DME
AMA always calculated the distance between origin and destination and the one of the longest leg ! And the distance between origin and destination @ least had to be 25% from the longest leg in the itin !
expl. LH BKK-PVG 1798 miles BKK-FRA 5599 longest leg > 25% = 1400 so this worked ! BKK-FRA-HKG not worked because BKK-HKG is less than 1425 miles ( here HKG-FRA is longer 5699 ).
Same TG CDG-BKK is 5878 LON is 5958
CDG-DME is 1547 and LON-DME is 1586 so this was ok with the 25% ! But even the so close to CDG positioned BRU was not valid !
BRU-BKK is 5762 and BRU-DME is 1409 ( But 25% from 5762 is 1441 ) , so it did not work !
It Looks like AMA set up the distance to over 55 %, but of course not only the distance, also still the layover time has to match !

That sounds reasonable but I don't think it applies to all cases, as for ex-c3 boomerangs any itins ex-icn didn't seem to work, even when the flight times aligned and space was available. Similarly, I can think of boomerangs where flight distance was less than 25% of origin - destination and it still worked on lm.

catharsis May 29, 2014 3:03 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22945871)
You are so close to it! But it was not 1/3rd it was 25 % !

AMA always calculated the distance between origin and destination and the one of the longest leg ! And the distance between origin and destination @ least had to be 25% from the longest leg in the itin !

It Looks like AMA set up the distance to over 55 %, but of course not only the distance, also still the layover time has to match !

So is this something that is inherent in Amadeus rather than the LM engine?

Certainly worth exploring.... does anyone know of a way to get visibility into Amadeus routings 'filtered' for *A carriers? KVS does not seem to offer that ability.

Also - I'm not sure I grasped the 'second' reference to 'AMA set up the distance to over 55%' though ? - would it be possible to clarify?

I've edited the quote because I fully expect these to re-emerge in the future.... almost always happens with FDs if you wait long enough :-)

TheBOSman May 29, 2014 3:12 pm


It's not just you! http://lifemiles.com looks down from here.

Service Unavailable

HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.
:mad: :mad:

bertheike May 29, 2014 3:28 pm

any example , where it worked ? C3 - C3 , where the direct distance between origin and dest. was less than 25 % from the longest leg ?

Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22946213)
That sounds reasonable but I don't think it applies to all cases, as for ex-c3 boomerangs any itins ex-icn didn't seem to work, even when the flight times aligned and space was available. Similarly, I can think of boomerangs where flight distance was less than 25% of origin - destination and it still worked on lm.


TheBOSman May 29, 2014 3:37 pm

Delete

catharsis May 29, 2014 4:06 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22946432)
any example , where it worked ? C3 - C3 , where the direct distance between origin and dest. was less than 25 % from the longest leg ?

Not C3 but C2 - shortest leg 776, longest leg 3869

Sounds like a nice theory though - certainly seems closer than many others.

scibuff May 29, 2014 4:58 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22946432)
any example , where it worked ? C3 - C3 , where the direct distance between origin and dest. was less than 25 % from the longest leg ?

For example on C2-C2, ***-***-*** used to work just fine but

- ***-*** - 3952 mi
- ***-*** - 3278 mi
- ***-*** - 676 mi

- C1-C1 had ***-***-*** and ***-***-***,
others that come to mind are ***-***-***, ***-***-***.

But, I don't see many such exceptions to the 25% *rule*


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22945871)
It Looks like AMA set up the distance to over 55 %, but of course not only the distance, also still the layover time has to match !

Well there are still working boomerangs where this is not satisfied (I'm seeing as low as 25.7% working)

Raul2014 May 29, 2014 5:13 pm

[QUOTE=yerffej201;22945785]i think austrian doesn't work, so only swiss and turkish afaik[/QUOTE

It does work.

Plasticus May 29, 2014 6:56 pm

Not sure how Amadeus was treating these; don't think it was distance based. It seemed to me that it was region based.

YVR SEA LAX SFO DEN where in one region
YYZ BOS IAD NYC MIA on the east.
Gray zones were DFW IAH
ORD seemed to have the least amount of options

ICN NRT PVG PEK one region
BKK KUL SIN another
HKG gray zone

Certain married segments would allow F to pop up 3 months out. That was the first to disappear a month ago.

After the FT member's incident, US-US went first 5-7 days before Can-US disappeared.

All viewable on Amadeus.

Amadeus is also weird. Some flights that depart shortly after midnight would not appear. Most Middle east to Europe departures and some Asia to Europe departures. So those flights would never be listed as an option even when F was available. Even now, when you search BKK to LHR/CDG/ZRH as an example and specify TG, Amadeus will not show the midnight flight. But still bookable through LM as a direct flight.

scibuff May 29, 2014 7:24 pm

The distance rule seems more plausible to me, especially to explain why certain C2 cities worked for boomerangs to C1 / C3 and others didn't, i.e surely (DUB, LHR,) AMS, FCO, MAD, ZRH, FRA, MUC are not split into different regions.

yerffej201 May 29, 2014 7:48 pm


Originally Posted by scibuff (Post 22947451)
The distance rule seems more plausible to me, especially to explain why certain C2 cities worked for boomerangs to C1 / C3 and others didn't, i.e surely (DUB, LHR,) AMS, FCO, MAD, ZRH, FRA, MUC are not split into different regions.

perhaps it's a combination of both. the amadeus timetable theory makes perfect sense, and so does the distance idea. but there are exceptions to both rules.

yerffej201 May 29, 2014 7:51 pm


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22946432)
any example , where it worked ? C3 - C3 , where the direct distance between origin and dest. was less than 25 % from the longest leg ?

yes, it was c3-c3. pmed.

yerffej201 May 29, 2014 7:53 pm


Originally Posted by catharsis (Post 22946280)
I've edited the quote because I fully expect these to re-emerge in the future.... almost always happens with FDs if you wait long enough :-)

I agree, and think it'd be nice if we at least stopped posting "dead" routings directly online... although I sound like a total hypocrite.

katomoto May 29, 2014 8:12 pm

There's no need to cipher codes and boomerangs anymore in v2.0??

wheresmybagba May 29, 2014 8:46 pm

I read on airlineroute that the non cabbage airline plans to start flights between China and everyone's favourite confection. However, I assume they'll be looking out for people making a break for the Maglev into the city!

Haven't checked if the connections are 'good'.

babypuwet May 29, 2014 9:17 pm


Originally Posted by wheresmybagba (Post 22947877)
I read on airlineroute that the non cabbage airline plans to start flights between China and everyone's favourite confection. However, I assume they'll be looking out for people making a break for the Maglev into the city!

Haven't checked if the connections are 'good'.

I believe they just applied for it. Not sure how long before its actually approved.....

TheBOSman May 29, 2014 10:04 pm


Originally Posted by katomoto (Post 22947686)
There's no need to cipher codes and boomerangs anymore in v2.0??

Of course not. Everything must be killed! :rolleyes: :mad:

I tried, efforts were rejected, so apparently even rather than ...... coding, the preference is for none. 100% bonus ends in 2 days, at which point a quick unsubscribe will certainly be in order. I'll have so much time back :D.

Aussie_flyer May 29, 2014 11:04 pm

Let's just create a wiki where everyone can add every trick they know or have known for everyone to see. Thats where we are headed now anyway.

MultiFlyer May 30, 2014 12:40 am


Originally Posted by Raul2014 (Post 22946914)

Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22945785)
i think austrian doesn't work, so only swiss and turkish afaik[/QUOTE

It does work.


What kind of black magic did you use to get an OS flight?
You must be the first one to be able to book an OS flight with LM.

MultiFlyer May 30, 2014 12:41 am


Originally Posted by Aussie_flyer (Post 22948320)
Let's just create a wiki where everyone can add every trick they know or have known for everyone to see. Thats where we are headed now anyway.

Already exists. The secret excel file in the aussie forum.

AirCanada881 May 30, 2014 12:51 am


Originally Posted by MultiFlyer (Post 22948533)
What kind of black magic did you use to get an OS flight?
You must be the first one to be able to book an OS flight with LM.

He's not the only one :)

MultiFlyer May 30, 2014 1:24 am

So you are saying that you can book any routing VIE - XXX which is offered by OS not only some system anomaly?

mlqsko May 30, 2014 1:55 am

There's no magic, you just have to know what to look for.

Only bookable OS route is VIE < > JFK at the moment. All other routes are operated by Tyrolean, hence not visible on LM. NRT and BKK used to be operated by OS as well, but not anymore.

http://i.imgur.com/JYuB2Ml.jpg

Availability is nightmare though.

MultiFlyer May 30, 2014 2:06 am


Originally Posted by mlqsko (Post 22948698)
There's no magic, you just have to know what to look for.

JFK is not in C3. ;-)

The claim was for an C3N - C3S routing via OS!

And btw - OS88 is also operated by VO.

AirCanada881 May 30, 2014 2:20 am


Originally Posted by MultiFlyer (Post 22948715)
JFK is not in C3. ;-)

The claim was for an C3N - C3S routing via OS!

And btw - OS88 is also operated by VO.

There is another route bookable with OS which originates in C3.

bertheike May 30, 2014 2:35 am


Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22947574)
yes, it was c3-c3. pmed.

The one you pmed me, was absolutly in rule with the 25% ! I PM back to you

bertheike May 30, 2014 2:37 am


Originally Posted by catharsis (Post 22946629)
Not C3 but C2 - shortest leg 776, longest leg 3869

Sounds like a nice theory though - certainly seems closer than many others.

No idea about that ! I never checked anything origin or departing from/to C1 .

bertheike May 30, 2014 2:40 am

very strange I still found one C2--C2.5 via C3 which works.
But it only works from one Airport in C2 to one in C2.5 ! No explaination why the others not work.

AirCanada881 May 30, 2014 2:46 am


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22948781)
very strange I still found one C2--C2.5 via C3 which works.
But it only works from one Airport in C2 to one in C2.5 ! No explaination why the others not work.

Definitely more than 1 airport ex C2 where it works.

WolfvanWeen May 30, 2014 3:15 am


Originally Posted by bertheike (Post 22948781)
very strange I still found one C2--C2.5 via C3 which works.
But it only works from one Airport in C2 to one in C2.5 ! No explaination why the others not work.

So I have to be at a party and offline for a bit over 24 hours and already all hell breaks loose here?

There are more airports from C2 to C2.5 and if we have the same C2.5 there is a stop in that leg, which probably explains its exceptional showing up.

As for some of you guys writing you have an exception to the distance rule (and bertheike, we should compare our distance tables :) ), I have tested that very extensively when it was still working and I've found only two classes of exception:
- one was with one specific region only, so there could be something in the argument that a combination of rules was used in the algorithm. In this region there might have been a "sub-region" rule. You don't find these anymore after the changes, so it's difficult to impossible to say whether this assumption holds true.
- the other one was for quite a few well known boomies of a different sort, where the destination was what I call a "lonely airport" (and these still do exist thanks god). There are a few in C2 but with abysmal availability, there are some in C3, C4 etc. etc. All of these boomerangs still work so that's about as much as you will hear from me. :)

FrugalLuxury May 30, 2014 3:39 am


Originally Posted by MultiFlyer (Post 22948533)
What kind of black magic did you use to get an OS flight?
You must be the first one to be able to book an OS flight with LM.

No magic necessary, DO&CO quite edible (over a two-course meal) e.g. for next week ;)

wheresmybagba May 30, 2014 4:45 am


Originally Posted by MultiFlyer (Post 22948535)
Already exists. The secret excel file in the aussie forum.

I assume you've never seen it then?

dewby May 30, 2014 5:51 am

I had a curious look around LM today.

Yes things have changed a lot and some real winners gone but lots of the old tricks from C 2 seem valid. C availability seemed low but lots in cattle class showing up even for some of our favs.

Searched around candy too. Interesting route back to wood cutter. Via C1 to c2 to our mis placed C1 airport.

You know what they say. You never stop learning.

Oh on secret files. Love them......

scibuff May 30, 2014 6:11 am


Originally Posted by mlqsko (Post 22948698)
There's no magic, you just have to know what to look for.

Only bookable OS route is VIE < > JFK at the moment. All other routes are operated by Tyrolean, hence not visible on LM. NRT and BKK used to be operated by OS as well, but not anymore.

**images removed **

Availability is nightmare though.

Availability is the major problem with OS on many routes not operated by Tyrolean but they do work!

I wonder if there is a 14-day release to LM on these - the furthest I see is seats (both Y and J) is Jun 15

imverge May 30, 2014 8:28 am


Originally Posted by scibuff (Post 22949301)
Availability is the major problem with OS on many routes not operated by Tyrolean but they do work!

I wonder if there is a 14-day release to LM on these - the furthest I see is seats (both Y and J) is Jun 15

I once booked BKK > VIE > TLV :D

Rusell May 30, 2014 8:50 am

Is there any c6 - c3 routes left now, I can't find them anymore.

tango3 May 30, 2014 9:30 am

Managed to book a 2-stop C3-C3 via C3 & C2 in J. How do I add to the knowledge base of info?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:23 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.