FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Avianca | LifeMiles and Amigo (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/avianca-lifemiles-amigo-716/)
-   -   LM F and J routes (and the occasional trick-it) Rebooted v2.0 (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/avianca-lifemiles-amigo/1580174-lm-f-j-routes-occasional-trick-rebooted-v2-0-a.html)

yuel May 27, 2014 7:29 am


Originally Posted by TheBOSman (Post 22930238)
The key word is "attempt". Remember, you actually know both so they seem easy to you. The coding doesn't matter for people who know. I'm attempting to move a step away from what is used. It doesn't affect now, it hopefully affects pages from now. But really, I could call them "the birds" and "the bees" and as long as I told enough people that was the new code, then we could use that.

I shall simply go with plan B, which is an unsubscribe, stop posting, go to my private forum, and continue the FT brain drain. Especially considering we have someone who has turned himself into a troll here, the discussion will be too easily derailed until people stop responding to him. Good luck y'all, I got a lot of Krug and caviar to go drink and eat :).

JessicaTam, give me some time to get home and get unjetlagged ;). Surprised the other discussion isn't better though? I haven't checked in in a while unfortunately.

Some people are just not appreciative or critical of others, but I appreciate what you are postings!

AirCanada881 May 27, 2014 7:29 am


Originally Posted by zagy (Post 22931315)
I agree... Without the tricks, LM is actually a very crappy FFP and wouldn't buy the miles there.
E.g. "no mixed cabin bookings" is now quite a pain for me. Trying to redeem 2 F tickets for FRA-JFK/YYZ/IAD. Because of this, I would have to buy a separate one way ticket to FRA with the cost of about 150/200€.

I think that's alittle drastic. I think LM can still be very interesting as long as the 2 for 1 promotion keeps going.

zagy May 27, 2014 7:41 am


Originally Posted by mlqsko (Post 22931246)
It was the <insert your own word here> who filed the compliant that killed it.

I can't believe LM fixed so many tricks in span of a week. Literally a full list of possibilities going places. Tons of different airlines, departure/arrival points from anywhere to everywhere. They were like Swiss cheese. Simply amazing and so sad.

Jeff, I hope your mom is proud of you and I hope I never get to meet you.

I'm not really surprised by the number of fixes. Programming and architecture of big IT systems is what I do and the level of quality really is laughable at AV. Guessing by some of our corporate clients (even a couple of airlines), they probably have a small IT department, with 2-3 developers who don't have a lot of experience. Some of the stuff there (like trusting user input) is really the work of someone who doesn't have a clue.

Here's what I think happened:
- DOT contacted AV, who is now forced to respond
- the response to DOT can't really be handled by one of their clueless support agents but from someone who actually knows a thing or two
- the smart(er) person looks at the ticket and sends an angry email to the Head of the IT department (with the High Priority icon as well :)) and copying one of the VPs
- the Head of the IT department gathers his two or three minions and says "come on guys... fix this... this is making us look stupid"
- so the devs take the route and check the bookings of this guy and take a look at what he did to get this dangerous route
- they also study what the hell "cabotage" is
- after a few hours, the lead developer maps out an "architecture" on how to prevent these types of bookings

My best guess is that they just inserted a couple of IF statements, which prevented some combinations, especially when selecting a carrier.

I wouldn't be surprised if this quick hack also disabled a couple of perfectly valid (non-tricked) routes.


Someone mentioned "costs of fixing it" in the old thread. The costs to fix their entire system really was minimal. And I'm talking about hours here, not days, weeks or months - even for someone who's clearly an amateur programmer.

katomoto May 27, 2014 12:10 pm

What happened? Away from my computer for a few days and tons of boomerangs are gone... :(

mlqsko May 27, 2014 12:14 pm


Originally Posted by katomoto (Post 22933069)
What happened? Away from my computer for a few days and tons of boomerangs are gone... :(

Not tons, but all of them.

KiFly May 27, 2014 1:26 pm

Ok, this is new to me.
Booked a well known tricked route and got the message "could not process credit card payment ...bla bla... please call our call center".

PNR created, miles are still there.

Obviously I don't want to call. Anyone had this before ? Will the reservation just be canceled if I don't call and thus no payment will go through ?

Any help appreciated

Air Rarotonga May 27, 2014 1:30 pm


Originally Posted by KiFly (Post 22933614)
Any help appreciated

What about some research by yourself first?

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/avian...lifemiles.html

yerffej201 May 27, 2014 1:55 pm


Originally Posted by KiFly (Post 22933614)
Ok, this is new to me.
Booked a well known tricked route and got the message "could not process credit card payment ...bla bla... please call our call center".

PNR created, miles are still there.

Obviously I don't want to call. Anyone had this before ? Will the reservation just be canceled if I don't call and thus no payment will go through ?

Any help appreciated

Yes the reservation will not go through. You'll need to wait for the seats to come back (if they do) and try again.

Prospero May 27, 2014 2:16 pm

Folks, this thread can only flourish if the topic is adhered to. Several personal digs have been removed. Please set aside past animosities that sullied the old thread.

Thanks for your co-operation and understanding.

Prospero
Senior Moderator

scibuff May 27, 2014 3:23 pm


Originally Posted by mlqsko (Post 22933095)
Not tons, but all of them.

nah, some still work, just not the absolutely cheapest ones, but you can still get some good savings.

superpointsLXflyer May 27, 2014 3:32 pm


Originally Posted by scibuff (Post 22934319)
nah, some still work, just not the absolutely cheapest ones, but you can still get some good savings.

My guess is that the IF statement guys only killed what has been booked (multiple times) or what could get them into additional trouble with the DOT

imverge May 27, 2014 3:45 pm

FYI: UA airport station at SUSHI is compiling a list of no-show PNR'S where CANDY was dropped. What they plan on doing with that info is not yet known.

What is known: 163 no-shows this year to date ALL originating from NA ALL ticketed in 202 stock (TACA) :eek:

Word of advice: Make sure if you are booked to CANDY you actually eat CANDY.

I'll keep the thread posted when my UA contact provides more 411.

Added: Pineapple to Candy no shows 241 YTD again all ticketed on TACA

catharsis May 27, 2014 4:54 pm

Hmmmm...

Expect to see UA pushing for Candy to be recoded to match UAs zoning I would guess.... this sort of investigation will not lead to nothing, there will be consequences....:(

Artemio May 27, 2014 5:46 pm

Just an info: 10% more expensive starting Oct 1st '14
 
LifeMiles just emailed a reminder today that included information about upcoming price rise of 10% starting on October 1, 2014.

Avianca is selling LifeMiles for $30 per 1,000 miles purchased (or per 2,000 miles during 2for1 promo), so it will be for $33 per 1,000 miles from Oct 1st.

JessicaTam May 27, 2014 6:52 pm


Originally Posted by Artemio (Post 22934982)
LifeMiles just emailed a reminder today that included information about upcoming price rise of 10% starting on October 1, 2014.

Avianca is selling LifeMiles for $30 per 1,000 miles purchased (or per 2,000 miles during 2for1 promo), so it will be for $33 per 1,000 miles from Oct 1st.

And the current 2 for 1 promo finishes in three days.

babypuwet May 27, 2014 7:01 pm

received an email today from LM proactively re-booking my candy eating kitty route. On it, had the LM contact number and told me to ask for the lifemiles back room. When I called, they politely explained it violated US laws (with no mention of cabotage...guess they dont know the terminology). They offered me the pineapple route with the old business class with no other options other than cancel. Since this booking is for my elderly parents, i need the lie flat business class seat, so I requested to cancel and refund. The nice lady explained to me that it can take up to 72 hours to process, but there will be no cancellation fee of $50 per ticket. The whole call took 32 minutes, of which the first 14 or so was waiting to be transferred to the right department. So it was rather painless.

JDiver May 27, 2014 8:46 pm

Let me put it a bit more bluntly than my nice colleague oliver2002.

The reason the "Rebooted v2.0" thread exists is because it was deemed useful by the value of information imparted and degree of participation, so we (Senior Moderators) agreed a "Rebooted v2.0" thread would preserve the function without the vitriol.

It is time to move on from past animus and upset. If this truly can't be done and the thread becomes maintenance intensive, disruptive and, we must reconsider discipline for members who are incapable of moving on to a more productive realm; I would personally hate to do that, but it is up to each and every of us.

Thank you for your understanding. Travel safely and well.

JDiver, Senior Moderator

mlqsko May 27, 2014 11:16 pm


Originally Posted by scibuff (Post 22934319)
nah, some still work, just not the absolutely cheapest ones, but you can still get some good savings.

Yet, you get to pay 55% more miles than usual, for example.

SFOvacations May 27, 2014 11:28 pm


Originally Posted by imverge (Post 22934421)
FYI: UA airport station at SUSHI is compiling a list of no-show PNR'S where CANDY was dropped. What they plan on doing with that info is not yet known.

What is known: 163 no-shows this year to date ALL originating from NA ALL ticketed in 202 stock (TACA) :eek:

Word of advice: Make sure if you are booked to CANDY you actually eat CANDY.

I'll keep the thread posted when my UA contact provides more 411.

Added: Pineapple to Candy no shows 241 YTD again all ticketed on TACA

Maybe it'll be a good idea to not use your UA MP# if you don't intend to eat the candy. Or your account may get blacklisted for hidden city ticketing.

yerffej201 May 28, 2014 1:32 am


Originally Posted by SFOvacations (Post 22936391)
Maybe it'll be a good idea to not use your UA MP# if you don't intend to eat the candy. Or your account may get blacklisted for hidden city ticketing.

I think your lm number is already attached to the ticket no?

Jermyn May 28, 2014 2:40 am


Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22933788)
Yes the reservation will not go through. You'll need to wait for the seats to come back (if they do) and try again.

In my experience your statement is incorrect.

I booked SQ J from SIN-FRA on the A380.
After inputting my credit card details I got the credit card error.
I called lifemiles, held for about 5 minutes whilst they checked and was told that I'd receive the e-ticket in the next 24 hours.

2 hours later, the e-ticket arrived.

caveat: I am Spanish and had no problems communicating. Experiences in English may vary.

montezume May 28, 2014 5:02 am


Originally Posted by Jermyn (Post 22936831)
In my experience your statement is incorrect.

I booked SQ J from SIN-FRA on the A380.
After inputting my credit card details I got the credit card error.
I called lifemiles, held for about 5 minutes whilst they checked and was told that I'd receive the e-ticket in the next 24 hours.

2 hours later, the e-ticket arrived.

caveat: I am Spanish and had no problems communicating. Experiences in English may vary.

Calling when booking a tricked itinerary is a bad idea.

Aussie_flyer May 28, 2014 5:05 am


Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22936683)
I think your lm number is already attached to the ticket no?

Obviously the poster is referring to adding your ua number after booking. For recognition as a UA elite

montezume May 28, 2014 5:06 am


Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22936683)
I think your lm number is already attached to the ticket no?

Some people attach other FF numbers to their reservations to try to take advantage of elite benefits, etc. In this case, it might not be the best idea.

Jermyn May 28, 2014 5:24 am


Originally Posted by montezume (Post 22937100)
Calling when booking a tricked itinerary is a bad idea.

No tricks needed.
SQ 77W and 388 J space shows up pretty frequently on the search, without forcing dates or carriers.

Suites needs tricks though, so I hear.

AirCanada881 May 28, 2014 5:27 am

I'm still seeing C2 to C1 very happily

montezume May 28, 2014 5:28 am


Originally Posted by Jermyn (Post 22937142)
No tricks needed.
SQ 77W and 388 J space shows up pretty frequently on the search, without forcing dates or carriers.

Suites needs tricks though, so I hear.

Except the original question was


Originally Posted by KiFly
Ok, this is new to me.
Booked a well known tricked route and got the message "could not process credit card payment ...bla bla... please call our call center".

PNR created, miles are still there.

Obviously I don't want to call. Anyone had this before ? Will the reservation just be canceled if I don't call and thus no payment will go through ?

Any help appreciated


germantraveler May 28, 2014 5:38 am

IMHO the now unavailable boomerangs have nothing to do with a change of LM's internal award space search algorithm.

Every (!) boomerang that used to been available on LM could be found in the Amadeus timetable so it was my conclusion that LM uses the Amadeus timetable for route search and then checks class availability on the segments found within that timetable.

When you now search for the same boomerangs in the Amadeus timetable, they are gone.


To verify my hypothesis, I did just a random search for "forced carrier" boomerangs within the Amadeus timetable and did found for example a C3-C2-C2.5...
... and: This boomerang still shows up in LM.

Final conclusion:
LM did not change anything within their algorithm...
BUT...
Amadeus changed it's timetable search algorithm.

Aussie_flyer May 28, 2014 5:38 am


Originally Posted by Wilko Pali Sedef (Post 22937158)
I'm still seeing C2 to C1

Was that supposed to be coded?

Totally pathetic attempt if so. Seriously this thread may as well cease to exist. Everything is known. Nothing is new, and the sad attempts at coding are just giving it all away.

AirCanada881 May 28, 2014 6:16 am


Originally Posted by Aussie_flyer (Post 22937201)
Was that supposed to be coded?

Totally pathetic attempt if so. Seriously this thread may as well cease to exist. Everything is known. Nothing is new, and the sad attempts at coding are just giving it all away.

You're smart enough to recognize code, good for you :) Now I'd advise using the same intellect in making sure your youtube videos aren't more shaky than an earthquake ;)

Jermyn May 28, 2014 6:18 am


Originally Posted by montezume (Post 22937162)
Except the original question was

Sorry, missed that :(

For the sake of clarity:

The credit card error appears on both tricked an non-tricked itineraries.
In my experience, a phone call quickly clears things up and ensures that you are ticketed.

However, if your itinerary is tricked, it is best not to call. You should wait 2 days and if you still see no e-ticket. If no ticket, move on.

Deltahater May 28, 2014 7:03 am


Originally Posted by germantraveler (Post 22937200)
IMHO the now unavailable boomerangs have nothing to do with a change of LM's internal award space search algorithm.

Every (!) boomerang that used to been available on LM could be found in the Amadeus timetable so it was my conclusion that LM uses the Amadeus timetable for route search and then checks class availability on the segments found within that timetable.

When you now search for the same boomerangs in the Amadeus timetable, they are gone.


To verify my hypothesis, I did just a random search for "forced carrier" boomerangs within the Amadeus timetable and did found for example a C3-C2-C2.5...
... and: This boomerang still shows up in LM.

Final conclusion:
LM did not change anything within their algorithm...
BUT...
Amadeus changed it's timetable search algorithm.

Any guesses as to why Amadeus changed?

zlatan_tu May 28, 2014 7:24 am


Originally Posted by Jermyn (Post 22937142)
No tricks needed.
SQ 77W and 388 J space shows up pretty frequently on the search, without forcing dates or carriers.

Suites needs tricks though, so I hear.

is it possible to book suites with LM?

zlatan_tu May 28, 2014 7:30 am


Originally Posted by germantraveler (Post 22937200)
IMHO the now unavailable boomerangs have nothing to do with a change of LM's internal award space search algorithm.

Every (!) boomerang that used to been available on LM could be found in the Amadeus timetable so it was my conclusion that LM uses the Amadeus timetable for route search and then checks class availability on the segments found within that timetable.

When you now search for the same boomerangs in the Amadeus timetable, they are gone.

how to search the Amadeus timetable for boomerangs?

hannes08 May 28, 2014 7:54 am


Originally Posted by germantraveler (Post 22937200)
When you now search for the same boomerangs in the Amadeus timetable, they are gone.
.....
Final conclusion:
LM did not change anything within their algorithm...
BUT...
Amadeus changed it's timetable search algorithm.

Expertflyer shows also non of the "old" bummerangs anymore.

This change may be a result of the investigations of DOT...

Pseudo Nim May 28, 2014 8:07 am


Originally Posted by hannes08 (Post 22937771)
Expertflyer shows also non of the "old" bummerangs anymore.

This change may be a result of the investigations of DOT...

I disagree. Many of the boomerangs were between one side of the USA and another in Canada, so that's not relevant to the DOT. For the few that were actual cabotage routes, so few were likely booked that I doubt they cared. However, I think it's significantly more likely LH simply decided it didn't want its cabins full of LifeMilers - as they were the only ones flying these insane routes - and they probably refiled their schedules.

WolfvanWeen May 28, 2014 8:39 am

I have a route on my screen now in Lifemiles which only shows up in Amadeus if you force the airline. On Lifemiles it shows up unforced, and the reason might simply be that there is a much shorter route served by TAM, which LM must avoid.

This route is a boomerang, but not an exact one in the sense Cx-Cx, but rather nearly Cx-Cx.

Before I was able to pre-pend another flight to this route, so that it truly was Cx-Cx. This other combination doesn't show up anymore, as the additional flight is on another airline, so you can't force it.

Note this has nothing to do with cabbage, nothing with UA, LH or Kitty, nothing with C1.

There have been changes, and I can buy the idea that they have happened outside LM, but right now it's very difficult to say what these changes were.

Plasticus May 28, 2014 8:58 am


Originally Posted by germantraveler (Post 22937200)
IMHO the now unavailable boomerangs have nothing to do with a change of LM's internal award space search algorithm.

Every (!) boomerang that used to been available on LM could be found in the Amadeus timetable so it was my conclusion that LM uses the Amadeus timetable for route search and then checks class availability on the segments found within that timetable.

When you now search for the same boomerangs in the Amadeus timetable, they are gone.


To verify my hypothesis, I did just a random search for "forced carrier" boomerangs within the Amadeus timetable and did found for example a C3-C2-C2.5...
... and: This boomerang still shows up in LM.

Final conclusion:
LM did not change anything within their algorithm...
BUT...
Amadeus changed it's timetable search algorithm.


Totally agree.

LM was pulling from the Amadeus system. The DOT likely confronted LM. LM probably told them this is not our fault; we are just pulling from the Amadeus system. Then they must have gone to the source - Amadeus and or LH as far as the boomerangs were concerned.

yerffej201 May 28, 2014 9:12 am


Originally Posted by zlatan_tu (Post 22937636)
is it possible to book suites with LM?

Yes.


Originally Posted by hannes08 (Post 22937771)
Expertflyer shows also non of the "old" bummerangs anymore.

This change may be a result of the investigations of DOT...


Originally Posted by Pseudo Nim (Post 22937847)
I disagree. Many of the boomerangs were between one side of the USA and another in Canada, so that's not relevant to the DOT. For the few that were actual cabotage routes, so few were likely booked that I doubt they cared. However, I think it's significantly more likely LH simply decided it didn't want its cabins full of LifeMilers - as they were the only ones flying these insane routes - and they probably refiled their schedules.


Originally Posted by Plasticus (Post 22938157)
Totally agree.

LM was pulling from the Amadeus system. The DOT likely confronted LM. LM probably told them this is not our fault; we are just pulling from the Amadeus system. Then they must have gone to the source - Amadeus and or LH as far as the boomerangs were concerned.

I guess when DOT confronted LM, they showed the schedules, and LH somehow found out and refiled schedules. That's sad. :(


Originally Posted by WolfvanWeen (Post 22938024)
I have a route on my screen now in Lifemiles which doesn't show up in Amadeus.

The route that shows up in Amadeus for the same origin destination doesn't show up in Lifemiles (which I have an explanation for: one of the legs is flown by TAM).

This route is a boomerang, but not an exact one in the sense Cx-Cx, but rather nearly Cx-Cx.

Before I was able to pre-pend another flight to this route, so that it truly was Cx-Cx. This other combination doesn't show up anymore. It has nothing to do with cabbage, nothing with UA, LH or Kitty, nothing with C1.

There have been changes, and I can buy the idea that they have happened outside LM, but right now it's very difficult to say what these changes were.

Me too. I'm showing a legal boomerang that doesn't show up on ExpertFlyer. I'm not sure if it's phantom or not.

germantraveler May 28, 2014 9:33 am


Originally Posted by yerffej201 (Post 22938227)
Me too. I'm showing a legal boomerang that doesn't show up on ExpertFlyer. I'm not sure if it's phantom or not.

IMHO ExpertFlyer does not use the Amadeus timetable. KVS's Timetable method does.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.