Last edit by: rustykettel
Alaska Lounges in ANC, LAX, PDX, and JFK accept Priority Pass (PP) on space-available (limited) basis.
Alaska Lounges in SEA no longer accept Priority Pass. (AS Lounges in SEA Leaving Priority Pass (9/1/2018)
2018 and earlier version of this thread.
Alaska Lounges in SEA no longer accept Priority Pass. (AS Lounges in SEA Leaving Priority Pass (9/1/2018)
2018 and earlier version of this thread.
Priority Pass and Denied Entry at Alaska Lounges Because of Space - 2019 and Later
#16
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,035
PP can increase the price that it charges Chase, and as a result, the low annual fee (150 USD) should not be able to justified the added cost.
i dont really use my PP benefits that much myself, as I can access DL lounge when I fly delta, UA lounge when I fly UA, AA (flagship lounge) when I fly AA -- none of this comes via PP.
i dont really use my PP benefits that much myself, as I can access DL lounge when I fly delta, UA lounge when I fly UA, AA (flagship lounge) when I fly AA -- none of this comes via PP.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
PP can increase the price that it charges Chase, and as a result, the low annual fee (150 USD) should not be able to justified the added cost.
i dont really use my PP benefits that much myself, as I can access DL lounge when I fly delta, UA lounge when I fly UA, AA (flagship lounge) when I fly AA -- none of this comes via PP.
i dont really use my PP benefits that much myself, as I can access DL lounge when I fly delta, UA lounge when I fly UA, AA (flagship lounge) when I fly AA -- none of this comes via PP.
Without PP, the CSR would not be competitive with other travel cards in its price range (~$500 AF). Lounge access standard for a high-end travel card.
#20
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,035
300 travel credit is trivial to use. i know of no person who couldnt use it.
unlike amex airline credit which takes real skill to use. that is 200 out of annual fee of 550
unlike amex airline credit which takes real skill to use. that is 200 out of annual fee of 550
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
I appreciate the fact ANC, PDX, LAX and JFK are still in Priority Pass. I understand access is not guaranteed, but hope there is still opportunity in the future to use these lounges. Just checked into PDX tonight- sad it closed early due to the delay of AS143, could have been there a bit longer. I do not encourage AS and PP to terminate any more agreements.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
The card has many benefits, and of course you get value from those benefits. That doesn't change the annual fee. I'm not sure why you are subtracting the travel credit and not the value of the other benefits.
The point is that there are only a few non-branded travel cards in that price range, with varying benefits, but they all include lounge access. Removing it would be a ridiculously bad marketing decision. -- it would make the card uncompetitive. If PP were to up the cost, they'd probably just go to a $500 AF. That still leaves them equal to the Citi Presige and still cheaper than the Amex Plat.
Bottom line: PP Select isn't going anywhere.
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,035
I don't see why I am better off when PP kicks AS out.
I have been able to access AS BR 80% of the time this yaer (and similar rate in 2018)
It was really easy back before the existence of CSR.
Many people obtain PP via CSR, as a result, it is crowding the BR.
In fact, I have friend who is debating to keep the CSR or not for the 150 net annual fee. ( They wouldn't even consider cards like amex plat which has a net annual fee of 350 after the airline credit.)
My argument is that the low annual net fee for CSR is causing the crowding and complaints.
It can be solved via increasing the net annual fee for majority of people.
I have been able to access AS BR 80% of the time this yaer (and similar rate in 2018)
It was really easy back before the existence of CSR.
Many people obtain PP via CSR, as a result, it is crowding the BR.
In fact, I have friend who is debating to keep the CSR or not for the 150 net annual fee. ( They wouldn't even consider cards like amex plat which has a net annual fee of 350 after the airline credit.)
My argument is that the low annual net fee for CSR is causing the crowding and complaints.
It can be solved via increasing the net annual fee for majority of people.
#24
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 123
Flying out of PDX and an MVP Gold last 3 years, I am around 2 for 30 when it comes to being admitted to the AS BR using PP. This is for PDX, SEA, and LAX. It became so I stopped even bothering to stop by the last 24 months as I knew it would be full. Amex Cent lounge lately has also been turning away Platinum card holders due to over capacity. This happened to me twice in SEA and twice in Las Vegas the last 90 days.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
I didn't say that you would be
Unfortunately that makes no sense. This is not Chase's problem; why would they give up business in order to solve it?
This is PP's problem. They can solve it by kicking AS (and other programs that abuse the system) out.
It can be solved via increasing the net annual fee for majority of people.
This is PP's problem. They can solve it by kicking AS (and other programs that abuse the system) out.
#26
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,035
and you can advocating PP to kick AS out? i am just confused.
arent people complained to Chase about not able to access AS lounge via their PP?
it is just my opinion that Chase users are more demanding than others.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Programs: Lots of programs, dirt on all of them!
Posts: 11,938
I appreciate the fact ANC, PDX, LAX and JFK are still in Priority Pass. I understand access is not guaranteed, but hope there is still opportunity in the future to use these lounges. Just checked into PDX tonight- sad it closed early due to the delay of AS143, could have been there a bit longer. I do not encourage AS and PP to terminate any more agreements.
#28
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 984
Originally Posted by psychtobe
They denied my attempt to purchase food on arrival. Claim you must now have an outbound BP, it has always been. Rule but now they are enforcing it. I call shenanigans but honestly didn't have the energy to argue.
I have received no notice of a change in T&Cs and I have never been denied entry at AS BR after a flight. I have no idea what would happen if I asked them to show me where this rule exists in writing. I can only guess PP started noticing a huge bump up in "lounge" usage especially late at night when they presupposed no one was heading out and, and the paying parties (Chase in my case) pushed back asking them to clamp down. Still, the change should be documented and distributed, not just arbitrary.
This isn't anything new...they started enforcing this weeks ago and the boarding pass enforcement has been the topic of discussion here on this thread. I must admit that I miss stopping for free food on arrival at my home airport (PDX), but I'm just happy that I can still stop when departing so I won't complain (too much....lol). The rule is in writing on the Priority Pass website....
They denied my attempt to purchase food on arrival. Claim you must now have an outbound BP, it has always been. Rule but now they are enforcing it. I call shenanigans but honestly didn't have the energy to argue.
I have received no notice of a change in T&Cs and I have never been denied entry at AS BR after a flight. I have no idea what would happen if I asked them to show me where this rule exists in writing. I can only guess PP started noticing a huge bump up in "lounge" usage especially late at night when they presupposed no one was heading out and, and the paying parties (Chase in my case) pushed back asking them to clamp down. Still, the change should be documented and distributed, not just arbitrary.
This isn't anything new...they started enforcing this weeks ago and the boarding pass enforcement has been the topic of discussion here on this thread. I must admit that I miss stopping for free food on arrival at my home airport (PDX), but I'm just happy that I can still stop when departing so I won't complain (too much....lol). The rule is in writing on the Priority Pass website....
#29
#30
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SJC / DPS
Programs: AS G75K, UA Silver
Posts: 1,757
Tried getting into JFK @1pm for a 5pm flight. I was naive and thought the standard PP rule was for a '3 hour max stay', but it definitely appears that the AS wording is 'max 3 hours before your flight', and this is enforced by the AS Lounge system.
The sign was not out, but the lounge computer would not accept my PP card with a boarding pass departing 4 hours later. I ended up using a 75K pass.
The sign was not out, but the lounge computer would not accept my PP card with a boarding pass departing 4 hours later. I ended up using a 75K pass.