Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Another new route: Announcing YYZ-DXB

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another new route: Announcing YYZ-DXB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2015, 5:31 pm
  #226  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,374
Originally Posted by winnipegrev

Nothing here is sudden. AC said siphoning off traffic by allowing more EK frequencies would cause reduced point-to-point flying to/from Canada. If EK flew daily 380s would the profitable traffic exist for point-to-point YYZ-DEL, YOW-FRA/LHR, YEG-LHR? Well I don't know, but I doubt it. They sure wouldn't be doing YYZ-DXB.
I dont know either. And we will not find out because AC got a subsidy from the government in a way of protection from competition.

I dont care where EK's traffic is going and whether they are making money or not. Thats their problem. But it would be nice if AC was not receiving a subsidy, and it was left up to the market to decide.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015, 9:47 am
  #227  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 5,813
Originally Posted by why fly
AC only wants to prove to the Govt that it tried DXB and it didnt work.
AC cant compete they just wait for the Govt to protect them from competition.
So AC has elected to operate a money-losing route to save themselves from losing money directly attributable to increased EK access?
And what happens if the route proves successful? Will AC cancel it and walk away from profits to mislead the Feds the market is not viable? Perhaps their entrance in the market will lead to increased access for ME3?
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Price sensitive - will fly AF/KL for $800
Comfort/product sensitive - will fly EK/EY on days EK is off and take the EY limo to DXB.

Whats left for AC? Corporate contracts, and die-hard Aeroplan loyalists?
You make it sound like this is some small, fringe element of Canadian air travellers?
Originally Posted by winnipegrev
Nothing here is sudden. AC said siphoning off traffic by allowing more EK frequencies would cause reduced point-to-point flying to/from Canada. If EK flew daily 380s would the profitable traffic exist for point-to-point YYZ-DEL, YOW-FRA
This is my personal frustration with AC on this whole DXB/EK matter.
IMO, It's unacceptable for Calin to publicly put YOWFRA on notice (on multiple occasions) if EK gets more access then proceed to seasonally cancel the route when EK was not granted any more access!?
Wished the Feds would have immediately allocated the dropped 4 weekly YOWFRA AC frequencies to ME3 to divy up into YYZ
CloudsBelow is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015, 10:58 am
  #228  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE MM, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton G,Nexus, Amex MR Plat,IHG Plat
Posts: 4,432
Originally Posted by PLeblond
I mostly agree.

The AF/KL is a connection, so one needs to compare non-stop to non stop. If you use AF/KL, you need to bring in LH, LX and god forbid UA.

I still believe (as I have stated earlier) that there is a large portion of the population that does not understand that Gulf Carriers are top class, and their association with Arab (read Muslim) world will turn many people off of them. Its sad, but a reality today.

Corporate customers, 'ignorant-flyers' and *G status chasers (I choose this above your choice of the term 'loyalist', since I fall into that category and know that EK J is one of the best out there, but I'm not willing to give up the perks on all my other flights just to try it) should be enough to fit the bill.

On a quasi-related note, does anybody know how CASM compares between the 789 and A380. Not to mention the actual number of seats they need to sell at their specific CASM to break even?
I agree with you and rankarouabu on different points.
For the increased business traffic to DXB, AC will pick some of this whether Y or J and these will be corp customers with contracts with AC and employees chasing status.
For all the price conscious connecting pax, EK wins hands down because of their connections to a ton of major and secondary cities in India, gulf countries and even Africa. Not sure yet of what ACs plans are for connecting pax. Most Y customers flying that route are already very familiar with EK/EY etc and for the same price will fly them over AC because of all the other stuff - connections, IFE, meals, etc.
Currently EK has a seat sale from JFK for $800 for TWO passengers to MXP return.
vernonc is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015, 12:00 pm
  #229  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 5,813
Originally Posted by vernonc
Currently EK has a seat sale from JFK for $800 for TWO passengers to MXP return.
A final shot at AZ/DL/AA before they lose their 5th Freedom rights on MXPJFK. Classic.

BTW, It's odd to see alternating posts between EK's incredible product/service and posts of their ultra low fare offerings.
CloudsBelow is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015, 12:20 pm
  #230  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE MM, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton G,Nexus, Amex MR Plat,IHG Plat
Posts: 4,432
Originally Posted by CloudsBelow
A final shot at AZ/DL/AA before they lose their 5th Freedom rights on MXPJFK. Classic.

BTW, It's odd to see alternating posts between EK's incredible product/service and posts of their ultra low fare offerings.
True. But a very good deal for anyone willing to fly that route. And likely better hard product too. And its normally QR that has the crazy prices.
vernonc is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015, 12:31 pm
  #231  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,374
Originally Posted by CloudsBelow
BTW, It's odd to see alternating posts between EK's incredible product/service and posts of their ultra low fare offerings.
odd that sometimes you can have it both ways?
I guess its different than AC - sh!tty product and high prices

But we are talking about ultra low Y fares - EK's J fares are not ultra low.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Jan 20, 2015, 9:39 am
  #232  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by 2MMKid
I applaud AC for setting the bar higher by now shutting down EK's plans for any expansion of frequency from YYZ, YYC and YVR! Bravo play there game right and AC will gain market share with the B-789 on that route feeding parts of India, and also a great around the world fare from YYZ-DXB-MUM-HKG-YVR-YYZ.
Bombay's airport code is BOM.
Also, you should not be applauding them, as this is an unfair market subsidy through restriction of competition (and higher fares, which should be avoided by anyone advocating for a more desirable free market.)
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2015, 3:01 pm
  #233  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Royal Air Maroc to join Star Alliance?

Mods - could not find a thread to post this
-----

In one of the threads (Dreamliner?) there were comments about people wanting AC to fly to Morocco.


Royal Air Maroc to join Star Alliance?

By David Flynn - Australian Business Traveller
PUBLISHED 21 JAN, 2015

http://www.ausbt.com.au/royal-air-ma...-star-alliance
24left is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2015, 3:07 pm
  #234  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,727
Originally Posted by 24left
Mods - could not find a thread to post this
-----

In one of the threads (Dreamliner?) there were comments about people wanting AC to fly to Morocco.


Royal Air Maroc to join Star Alliance?

By David Flynn - Australian Business Traveller
PUBLISHED 21 JAN, 2015

http://www.ausbt.com.au/royal-air-ma...-star-alliance
Its been discussed in the *A Tread.

They have a daily from YUL, I doubt AC needs to or wants any part of that route.
PLeblond is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2015, 8:13 am
  #235  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,130
Originally Posted by winnipegrev
Did AC ever say there was no Canada-UAE traffic, or did they just say that there wasn't enough to justify any one country having more than 6 frequencies per week?
AC said many things. There was a lot of contradictory stuff being thrown out there.

I have a 2006 document in which Air Canada proposed a partnership with Emirates. It called for a coordinated schedule between Canada and Dubai, starting with a daily Dubai-Toronto flight and expanding to other cities. It asked Emirates to operate its own aircraft on the routes. It even suggested flight times to maximize connections with Air Canada.

But Air Canada demanded 50 per cent of the profits, having made minimal investment and taken little or no risk.

Emirates declined. It continued patiently negotiating with Ottawa to upgrade its thrice-weekly Toronto flights to daily, and also fly to Calgary and Vancouver. Etihad also wanted daily flights to Toronto.

They were backed by the governments of Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia, as well as business and consumer groups
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/edito...e_exposed.html

There was enough traffic till there wasn't. If it helps, the number of Canadians living in the UAE has increased from 27,000 to 40,000 over the past 4 years, so it begs the question - does one make decisions based on how much traffic there is today, or how much potential there is in the market? Governments in other countries tend to take a pounding when they make decisions based on the former rather than the latter.

Originally Posted by winnipegrev
Nothing here is sudden. AC said siphoning off traffic by allowing more EK frequencies would cause reduced point-to-point flying to/from Canada. If EK flew daily 380s would the profitable traffic exist for point-to-point YYZ-DEL, YOW-FRA/LHR, YEG-LHR? Well I don't know, but I doubt it. They sure wouldn't be doing YYZ-DXB.
I thought EK wanted to send 777s daily but switched to the 380 when they couldn't? At least that is what I recall happening.

But that aside, many here (and AC itself) argued that a daily flight would spell the death knell for YEG-LHR and YOW-FRA (Calin himself, in this case). Well, how are those routes doing now? YOW-FRA is apparently unsustainable if the folk flying it now choose the YYZ-DXB flight instead.

To be clear, EK is not, in fact, flying daily. Despite this, YOW-FRA and YEG-LHR are ...well, yeah. As for YYZ-DEL, I dare suggest that EK's daily flights wouldn't have changed much. They're not all that reliant on DEL per se (their strength as always been their network to tier 2 South Asian cities - which aren't particularly well served through DEL). The real threat to point to point YYZ-DEL are the 9Ws, BAs, AF's, KLs, TKs etc, all of which have the ability to price aggressively.

Will AC succeed on this route? I don't know. I suspect it will depend on which way the traffic is flowing. If its DXB->Canada, EK will have home court advantage. If its Canada->DXB, AC should (although as a new entrant, its not going to appeal necessarily to the non FF crowd who are familiar with EK). If the goal is to pick up US traffic, it really depends on how EK responds - they're not shy about entering new markets.
yulred is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2015, 1:33 pm
  #236  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by PLeblond
Its been discussed in the *A Tread.

They have a daily from YUL, I doubt AC needs to or wants any part of that route.
It can be a cheap way to get to Africa (and Europe by taking a boat across the Mediterranean.)
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2015, 2:55 pm
  #237  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,727
Originally Posted by yulred
Will AC succeed on this route? I don't know. I suspect it will depend on which way the traffic is flowing. If its DXB->Canada, EK will have home court advantage. If its Canada->DXB, AC should (although as a new entrant, its not going to appeal necessarily to the non FF crowd who are familiar with EK). If the goal is to pick up US traffic, it really depends on how EK responds - they're not shy about entering new markets.
A very concise and well stated opinion.

Breath of fresh air in this thread.
PLeblond is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 2:41 pm
  #238  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,106
It's looks 90% certain I've got business in Abu Dhabi in November, and so the option of several airlines presents itself.

I'm currently SE, but wavering. (Lots of time to figure things out). My contract will cover biz-class x 2

Questions:

-- if AC doesn't deploy 787 in November as planned, they will run the route, right? Swap in a 777 likely, since 767 won't make it? They won't cancel, correct?

-- if loyalty doesn't matter, I can do YYZ-AUH direct on Etihad ... or I could do Emirates to Dubai (and car service from there).

-- bringing my wife (no girlfriend, LOL; other threads, inside joke etc) and so thinking of that too.

Suggestions?
InTheAirGuy is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2015, 3:23 pm
  #239  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
Originally Posted by InTheAirGuy
It's looks 90% certain I've got business in Abu Dhabi in November, and so the option of several airlines presents itself.

I'm currently SE, but wavering. (Lots of time to figure things out). My contract will cover biz-class x 2

Questions:

-- if AC doesn't deploy 787 in November as planned, they will run the route, right? Swap in a 777 likely, since 767 won't make it? They won't cancel, correct?

-- if loyalty doesn't matter, I can do YYZ-AUH direct on Etihad ... or I could do Emirates to Dubai (and car service from there).

-- bringing my wife (no girlfriend, LOL; other threads, inside joke etc) and so thinking of that too.

Suggestions?
I don't see a scenario where the 787 doesn't operate. Even if delays to the 789 exist, the 788 can still fly the route (as it is scheduled 1x/wk anyway) and that is almost certainly what AC would do. AC should have 10 787s by then... plenty of them to sub in if something happens to one.
winnipegrev is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 10:42 am
  #240  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,374
Looks like prices have aligned to the competition (BA/KL/etc) on YYZ-DXB for the fall - so much for being able to get a premium for the nonstops....
rankourabu is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.