Aegean's first A320neo is out in a new livery
#47


Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: OTP
Programs: AF/KL platinum, Turkish gold, QR gold
Posts: 1,764
As an ex-A3 FF who has since moved on to TK due to circumstances (having fallen back from A3 *G to nothing after a two year hiatus of flying - and TK being the only option to get a status match for my SkyTeam status to regain instant *G) I have to say that the differences between the programs aren't that big. Sure, there are some aspects which make TK's program very attractive, but there are equally some aspects of Miles+Bonus which I still miss. This counts both for different earning and spending tables with each their own sweet spots - as well as other perks and the design of the program. I can for example still remember complaining about software issues on these boards and certain aspects of the website not properly functioning, but believe me, that is nothing to the challenges of TK M&S IT systems

For those contemplating OZ or TK - don't automatically assume that the grass is greener outside of Greece!
#48




Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Heraklion, Greece
Posts: 7,931
#49


Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEL
Programs: STE+, used to be with TK but left due to their corruption and political ties
Posts: 4,524
Olympic is a full partner of Turkish Airlines Miles&Smiles - that might be an option!
As an ex-A3 FF who has since moved on to TK due to circumstances (having fallen back from A3 *G to nothing after a two year hiatus of flying - and TK being the only option to get a status match for my SkyTeam status to regain instant *G) I have to say that the differences between the programs aren't that big. Sure, there are some aspects which make TK's program very attractive, but there are equally some aspects of Miles+Bonus which I still miss. This counts both for different earning and spending tables with each their own sweet spots - as well as other perks and the design of the program. I can for example still remember complaining about software issues on these boards and certain aspects of the website not properly functioning, but believe me, that is nothing to the challenges of TK M&S IT systems
For those contemplating OZ or TK - don't automatically assume that the grass is greener outside of Greece!
As an ex-A3 FF who has since moved on to TK due to circumstances (having fallen back from A3 *G to nothing after a two year hiatus of flying - and TK being the only option to get a status match for my SkyTeam status to regain instant *G) I have to say that the differences between the programs aren't that big. Sure, there are some aspects which make TK's program very attractive, but there are equally some aspects of Miles+Bonus which I still miss. This counts both for different earning and spending tables with each their own sweet spots - as well as other perks and the design of the program. I can for example still remember complaining about software issues on these boards and certain aspects of the website not properly functioning, but believe me, that is nothing to the challenges of TK M&S IT systems

For those contemplating OZ or TK - don't automatically assume that the grass is greener outside of Greece!
That said, TK is good in earning, has some redemptions sweet spots (if you're able to redeem on partners) and status is easy to come by and maintain.
#51


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 192
This may be the wrong place to ask this, but i thought it might be related. I have an April 12th Rome to Athens flight booked on Aegean. They just changed the plane I believe as I had exit rows and they had to reassign me. The plane it says the flight is an A321 but the seat map doesn't line up with what I see online at various sites. It still has the 2x2 configuration in the front exit row, but they show that as row 10 whereas places like Seatguru and others show it as row 9. There is no row 9 listed on their seat map. Same in the back. They show the rear exit row as row 26, where most sites online show it as row 24. Is that a new plane configuration or is that just a weird way of them showing the maps online?
I grabbed the 10b/10c as I'm traveling with my wife and the 2x2 is what we always try to grab.
I grabbed the 10b/10c as I'm traveling with my wife and the 2x2 is what we always try to grab.
#52
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: ARN
Programs: A3*G, SK*G
Posts: 336
This may be the wrong place to ask this, but i thought it might be related. I have an April 12th Rome to Athens flight booked on Aegean. They just changed the plane I believe as I had exit rows and they had to reassign me. The plane it says the flight is an A321 but the seat map doesn't line up with what I see online at various sites. It still has the 2x2 configuration in the front exit row, but they show that as row 10 whereas places like Seatguru and others show it as row 9. There is no row 9 listed on their seat map. Same in the back. They show the rear exit row as row 26, where most sites online show it as row 24. Is that a new plane configuration or is that just a weird way of them showing the maps online?
I grabbed the 10b/10c as I'm traveling with my wife and the 2x2 is what we always try to grab.
I grabbed the 10b/10c as I'm traveling with my wife and the 2x2 is what we always try to grab.
Unless there has been some rather recent change, both 10 and 11 are emergency exit rows on the A321. There are only 2x2 seats in row 10 (no 10A/F). Pitch is huge and provides plenty of room to fully stretch your legs. Pitch in row 11 is not as generous, with the exception of the window seats (11A/11F) which provide even more legroom as there are no window seats in row 10. A downside of seats 10 B/C (apart of course from bags having to be stored overhead for taxi, takeoff and landing) is that one has to use the often flimsy tables stored in the armrest. There is moreover practically no window in that that row (save for a tiny elevated one). If you don't mind those things though 10B/C should be very fine for a couple.
I think there might be also an alternative configuration, but I can't be positive since my usual A3 routes rarely involve the A321. Fellow A3 flyers please correct me if I am wrong! The flight is anyway rather short so it shouldn't matter that much... Safe flights!
#55
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK/GR
Programs: A3*G
Posts: 31
Are you from RHO too?
Last edited by georgetasioulis; Feb 5, 2020 at 3:11 pm
#57
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: ARN
Programs: A3*G, SK*G
Posts: 336
)I do visit rather often though. My wife is half Greek, and her parents spend most of their year in Rhodos ever since they retired. Every now and then I travel there for work too. Which is nice since I get my employer to pay for my tickets for my family visit...

Onboard Wi-Fi would be great, especially in longer flights. ATH-ARN for example involves 3+ hours of cruise time, during which it's not always easy to focus and do real work. Lack of space, screaming children, inconsiderately loud neighbours, etc... So it would be more efficient to use this time to finish some mechanical and less mentally challenging tasks, such as answering emails, downloading data, and filling out forms. Then when you arrive you are mostly done with all this boring stuff, which is a nice feeling and saves you time!
#59
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK/GR
Programs: A3*G
Posts: 31
Onboard Wi-Fi would be great, especially in longer flights. ATH-ARN for example involves 3+ hours of cruise time, during which it's not always easy to focus and do real work. Lack of space, screaming children, inconsiderately loud neighbours, etc... So it would be more efficient to use this time to finish some mechanical and less mentally challenging tasks, such as answering emails, downloading data, and filling out forms. Then when you arrive you are mostly done with all this boring stuff, which is a nice feeling and saves you time!
Thank you

Originally Posted by KLouis
I, in contrast, wish and... hope they won't have any!
#60




Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Heraklion, Greece
Posts: 7,931








