![]() |
Originally Posted by Davidwnc
(Post 12743596)
Certain restaurants in Europe that say in their menus that they are going to add a XX% service charge – just out of curiosity, do these confuse you as well, or are you able to cope and understand what is happening?
I agree, though, I find it a rather odd practice. I prefer the French approach, where the price that you get if you add up everything that you've ordered is the price that you're expected to pay, service included. |
Originally Posted by Mr H
(Post 12741690)
As for what service staff are paid - that's a matter between them and their employer. Why should I have to step in just because their employer doesn't pay them a good wage? Here in the UK we have a minimum wage and employers have to pay it. There is no need to for customers to supplement it. Unless they like creating the master servant relationship - toss the black boy a shiny coin. No, that's something I would leave well in the past where it belongs.
The below quote kind of reinforce that view.
Originally Posted by mshaikun
(Post 12742039)
In the US there are people who work for low wages and depend on tips. If they were paid more the cost of your meal would be higher. In Europe, restaurant meal costs are often way higher than in the US.
The tipping system puts you in control. Don't feel the need to tip for bad service. I tip between 10 and 20% based on service and on rare occasions nothing at all. I do not punish servers for kitchen issues and other issues beyond their control. |
Originally Posted by tsastor
(Post 12743726)
That practise does not exist where I live. Can't say I recall when I've last seen that elsewhere in Europe either, but I'm sure it exists. If it is clearly stated then I'm annoyed to have to do the math but see it as part of the fixed price. If not, then it is fraud IMO.
|
Originally Posted by malsf1
(Post 12738623)
<snip>
In those situations where tipping is customary in the U.S., employees are paid minimum wages and rely on tips to ensure reasonable compensation for their work. To all those who yell "oh we don't have a tipping culture in MY country"... if certain types of employment was exempted from minimum wage laws, I'm pretty sure that a tipping culture would develop - and quickly. So please ... try to be a bit more sympathetic and at least understand the situation before you judge it. To the OP, I appreciate that you're trying to steer clear of places/situations where tipping is the norm. That's your right. But please don't stiff somebody where a tip is expected - that's just not nice. |
Originally Posted by Ichinensei
(Post 12743997)
They do that here in Canada. If you have 10 people at a table or something - they automatically charge you 15%. Which I think is an absolutely highway robbery - and I dont normally go back there
|
Originally Posted by KSinNYC
(Post 12744019)
To all those who yell "oh we don't have a tipping culture in MY country"... if certain types of employment was exempted from minimum wage laws, I'm pretty sure that a tipping culture would develop - and quickly.
|
Originally Posted by Mr H
(Post 12741690)
I do so by supporting local independent businesses rather than multi-national chains.
But just so we're clear.... local independed businesses need to follow the same federal and state minimum wage guidelines as big multi-national chains. So the bartender in the local bar is getting the same base wage as the bartender in the Four Seasons. And they both rely on tips. |
Originally Posted by KSinNYC
(Post 12744089)
But just so we're clear.... local independed businesses need to follow the same federal and state minimum wage guidelines as big multi-national chains. So the bartender in the local bar is getting the same base wage as the bartender in the Four Seasons. And they both rely on tips.
|
Originally Posted by Mr H
(Post 12741690)
This reminds be of the USSR in the 1980s - so many restaurants apparently full but if you paid 5 rubles to the doorman he'd show you in to one of the many empty tables. In the nightclub example, sir, you might be confusing a tip with a bribe.
It is obvious from the post, Americans like to give, Europeans don't, yeah we are suckers. I'm sure many Americans would gladly tip a few bucks here or there, even if they weren't required to, someone already said what's a few dollars here or there to help someone out? Actually last year, while researching a hotel I wanted to stay in Paris, many reviews had complained about their stuff being stolen when they failed to leave a tip for the house-keeping, I remember one in particular who said his stuff was put back where it was when he left a tip the next day...so what does this say about tipping, are you blaming Americans for this type of behavior? |
Originally Posted by Mr H
(Post 12744115)
Are hotels and bars really prohibited from paying their staff a living wage?
|
Originally Posted by Mr H
(Post 12744083)
It didn't in the UK when the minimum wage was abolished.
|
Competitive visible largess - a great sport. People in tipping cultures love to be seen tipping. It re-enforces (or buys) social status.
Justified on the basis of "sparing a few bucks for the those guys who don't earn much", it puts objectors on the ethical back foot. But not for long - the big tippers are often proud to tell how they get some special extra service "in return". So then we go around the loop again, and rates go up again. Then it gets exported to poorer countries where tipping isn't normal. (Hey those guys are so poor, let's help them out.) Yep everyone's smiling - except of course the local customers who get ignored when the big tipper's in town. How sad when a culture gets to the state where the only way you can get "good" service from people is by injecting cash at the receipt of that service. |
Originally Posted by CousinNick
(Post 12741392)
Boy, this is about as arrogant as it gets. And here I thought only Americans were that way. :td:
Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF Yes we expect americans to adapt to our customs, but they're not usually as bad as the ones we are expected to adapt to in the US (for example tipping). We should only expect people to adapt to customs that are good. (Or are required by law.) I was making comment to a previous poster to me who had said, in essence, that Americans are expected to adapt to local customs, therefore foreigners should adapt to American customs. I was agreeing in part, but was making the point that most non-American customs (for example in respect of tipping) are far less onerous than the American equivalents. For example, it is very easy for an American to adapt to a 'please don't tip' culture than it is for a non-US person to have to adapt to a 'tip me at every possible moment' culture. Having read subsequent comment in this thread about how some workers are taxed as if they earn a minimum tip, my response to that is that sholdn't they should still earn it? If I am provided with bad or aggressive service to be forced to pay a tip I don't care whether you're taxed or not. And that supports my second part of my statement that we should only be required to adapt to customs which are good. Tipping when service is bad just perpetuates a sense of entitlement regardless of service provided. If the people stopped tipping just because they are forced to, then maybe service would improve to the point where we'd actually want to tip. Happy to discuss further :) regards lme ff |
Originally Posted by jimbo99
(Post 12744533)
How sad when a culture gets to the state where the only way you can get "good" service from people is by injecting cash at the receipt of that service.
(Of course Egypt is another extreme - The culture of baksheesh is almost exhausting :)) |
Originally Posted by gglave
(Post 12744580)
but if I compare my experience in a typical pub restaurant in Seattle as compared to Portsmouth, the service will be consistently better in Seattle as the server tries to 'earn' her tip.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:41 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.