View Poll Results: Is an American Airlines/US Airways merger good for the traveling public?
Yes
84
28.19%
No
214
71.81%
Voters: 298. You may not vote on this poll
Last edit by: aztimm
Note:
There is an existing thread in the AA forum that may be useful to US and AA Flyertalkers:
US-AA Merger: Just the Facts thread
As facts become posted, that should be the place to look.
Merger discussion, speculation, and other questions can be directed here, or the similar thread in the AA forum:
MERGER: US and AA 9 Dec 2013 and implications for AA flyers (new)
AA - US Merger Agreement / Announcement / DOJ Action Discussion (consolidated, and now closed to new posts)
There is an existing thread in the AA forum that may be useful to US and AA Flyertalkers:
US-AA Merger: Just the Facts thread
As facts become posted, that should be the place to look.
Merger discussion, speculation, and other questions can be directed here, or the similar thread in the AA forum:
MERGER: US and AA 9 Dec 2013 and implications for AA flyers (new)
AA - US Merger Agreement / Announcement / DOJ Action Discussion (consolidated, and now closed to new posts)
US/AA merger- MASTER DISCUSSION THREAD/incl 'when will US leave STAR'
#586
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: UA 1K 1MMer & LT UC (when flying UA); Hyatt Credit Cardist; HHonors Diamond; Marriott Gold via UA 1K
Posts: 6,956
The question becomes: Will the surviving AA execs have enough influence to convince Doug and Scott that MCE is an important enough feature to retain (and expand to the US fleet), even if the bean counters "prove" otherwise? I don't have confidence that MCE will survive the merger, but I really hope that I am wrong.
#587
Moderator: American AAdvantage & Marriott Bonvoy
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHX
Programs: American ExPlat; Marriott/SPG Lifetime Plat; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,116
Doug Parker has consistently made decisions by the numbers and he's not going to change that approach now. If the bean counters 'prove' that MCE doesn't improve the bottom line, not only will US aircraft not be changed, but AA aircraft will be changed -- to get rid of it.
But I don't predict this outcome, as I don't believe the bean counters will be able to prove such a thing. There's a reason CO management adopted it across the board at the New United -- because it was demonstrated that it makes the company money.
Same reasoning is influencing DL.
Make no mistake, Parker will drive his team to figure out how to make the most money possible from MCE, a la the US 'Choice Seats' that absolutely everyone must pay for to secure in advance, but it's hard for me to imagine a circumstance where they abandon it. 1) It's completely counter to how they're positioning the New American; and 2) UA, DL and the current AA are almost assuredly not wrong about its profitability.
#588
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
Make no mistake, Parker will drive his team to figure out how to make the most money possible from MCE, a la the US 'Choice Seats' that absolutely everyone must pay for to secure in advance, but it's hard for me to imagine a circumstance where they abandon it. 1) It's completely counter to how they're positioning the New American; and 2) UA, DL and the current AA are almost assuredly not wrong about its profitability.
I'd really love to see a "true" Premium Economy product with domestic F seats similar to BA, CX and QF - and it's something I'd gladly shell out for. Sadly I don't think any US carrier will ever offer that.
Last edited by thomwithanh; Apr 30, 2013 at 6:48 pm
#589
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: Marriott LTG, HHonors Diamond, Nat'l Exec
Posts: 3,581
Doug Parker has consistently made decisions by the numbers and he's not going to change that approach now. If the bean counters 'prove' that MCE doesn't improve the bottom line, not only will US aircraft not be changed, but AA aircraft will be changed -- to get rid of it.
But I don't predict this outcome, as I don't believe the bean counters will be able to prove such a thing. There's a reason CO management adopted it across the board at the New United -- because it was demonstrated that it makes the company money.
But I don't predict this outcome, as I don't believe the bean counters will be able to prove such a thing. There's a reason CO management adopted it across the board at the New United -- because it was demonstrated that it makes the company money.
Good luck snagging a decent E+ seat at check-in as a United silver. I've had trouble finding anything but middle E+ seats to *pay* for a week out, on some routes.
#590
Moderator: American AAdvantage & Marriott Bonvoy
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHX
Programs: American ExPlat; Marriott/SPG Lifetime Plat; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,116
That said, I'm not certain keeping MCE at AA is at odds with his previous statement -- US has historically had fairly low yields on its flights as a result of its less commanding market position. That demands packing more people onto planes. A carrier selling more higher-fare seats has more latitude to offer products like Y+ and potentially have the higher average fare offset the slightly lower capacity of the plane.
You never heard them referring to US like this: "We will be a global carrier and will need to reflect such. Our direct competitors will be Delta and United. To that point, our product will be equal, if not better than that of Delta or United."
I think the decision to adopt MCE across at least the mainline fleet will be easy for him to make if the numbers add up.
#591
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
I completely agree with this. In fact, it was a point I meant to make. Parker and Kirby's statements regarding a MCE/E+ product related to US as it exists today (the 'LCC'). The combination with AA changes everything.
You never heard them referring to US like this: "We will be a global carrier and will need to reflect such. Our direct competitors will be Delta and United. To that point, our product will be equal, if not better than that of Delta or United."
I think the decision to adopt MCE across at least the mainline fleet will be easy for him to make if the numbers add up.
You never heard them referring to US like this: "We will be a global carrier and will need to reflect such. Our direct competitors will be Delta and United. To that point, our product will be equal, if not better than that of Delta or United."
I think the decision to adopt MCE across at least the mainline fleet will be easy for him to make if the numbers add up.
#592
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Received the "Your First Class upgrade" email for an AA flight. Does this happen to anyone else?
#593
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,606
#595
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
#597
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
AA "instant upgrade" (YUP / KUP) ticket / fare (consolidated)
If the upgrade is not available at time of purchase, and you have this type coach ticket, couldn't it clear somewhere along the way when a seat opens up? I've never booked one of these to know the fine details, having always relied on my EXP upgrades.
#598
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
I was thinking about AA YUP fares (coach fares that qualify for an instant upgrade):
AA "instant upgrade" (YUP / KUP) ticket / fare (consolidated)
. . .
AA "instant upgrade" (YUP / KUP) ticket / fare (consolidated)
. . .
#599
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in F, hopefully
Posts: 670
The wisdom of that would depend on how many miles a person has accumulated. Enough for domestic R/T - sure, hold on to them as long as reasonably possible. 750K miles - hard to use up in a short time span if it looks like they may expire before being used.
What I'd suggest as an alternative to "use or lose" for sunnyjl is to keep the miles alive with a minor purchase through DM shopping every year if the intention is to really switch all flying to B6. The miles can be there for a future award while the dust settles from a merger.
Jim
What I'd suggest as an alternative to "use or lose" for sunnyjl is to keep the miles alive with a minor purchase through DM shopping every year if the intention is to really switch all flying to B6. The miles can be there for a future award while the dust settles from a merger.
Jim
#600
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,188
Projected date for US move to Oneworld
Is there one yet? Looking at AA or US for an international trip in October-November and wondering about ff miles. I have AA and UA ff accounts, and wife has TAM. Thanks.