![]() |
I guess it's a real bummer if you're a 74,999 EQM flier.
Personally, it is what it is. I typically fly in the 100-150K range, but a substantial portion of that is international and I usually have CR-1s that go to waste. This year I have 6 unused CR-1s lying around, and I'm not sure if I'll use them with UDU taking care of me domestically. The bottom line is that whatever the policies of the program, they're going to be better for some than others, and there will always be border regions which result in great irritation if you're on the wrong side of the border. The more you fly, the more you get. Those of us who don't have big personal or corporate budgets to spend on travel should at some level be grateful we are not in a KrisFlyer style program. Doesn't mean it's nice when things change, but, to paraphrase Sir Alex Ferguson's wonderful take on greener grass, sometimes you look in a field and see another cow and you think it's a better cow than the one you've got in your own field, but it isn't. At the end of the day, we can all vote with our butts, and place them in the seats of the airline (and program) that works best for us. It's really as simple as that. |
Originally Posted by MBS PremExec
(Post 15157407)
Folks, I have always found it best to write snail-mail to a VP (in this case VP of Mileage Plus). You receive a snail-mail letter in return from someone in their office.
I think this would be more effective than writing 1K or 1P voice. It's certainly what I'm going to do. It takes a few more minutes and costs $0.44 cents (or what, I don't know, what does it cost to mail a letter these days). But I have confidence in my voice actually being heard when I do the snail mail. |
FT Awards: United Mileage Plus best elite-level airline program in the Americas
4 Nov 2010 – 16 Nov 2010
Wow, that was short lived. Heck of a job, Jeff. :td: |
Guess I'll just say it again for effect: shouldn't we save our ammo for E+?
|
As a 1P segment qualifier, I am very disappointed in the changes, too. :td::td:
I have come close to 1K before but now never will. I don't see how anyone can have a life (or any kind of posture) after taking 120 EQS per year, especially for those of us in CRJ markets. I also don't like how these are being billed as improvements. One thing I used to like about UA was that it treated people as if they were intelligent and could figure things out (ie full pricing displays on website, etc). This should not be listed as an "improvement" but a simple email that says "elite benefit changes." |
Originally Posted by AAExPlat
(Post 15157004)
The way I see it, CO Plats don't gain much of anything, and UA 1ks are losing a bunch of benefits.
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 15157390)
If they drop 1P- to *S, I am definitely leaving...
|
Originally Posted by sfosolo
(Post 15157692)
4 Nov 2010 – 16 Nov 2010
Wow, that was short lived. Heck of a job, Jeff. :td: |
Not many 1p's chiming in here. I don't think it looks very good for us. I'm really not convinced of the need to have so many levels. Maybe they could just add some extra benefits at specific mileage levels but for the whole priority system, they could consolidate into either 25/50/75 or 25/50/100. No need for 25/50/75/100/120 or whatever they plan to do.
|
Originally Posted by United PR
(Post 15155103)
. Check out the updates here and see how the elite program updates benefit you.
|
SWUs
I am disappointed that UA once again missed out on an opportunity to make SWUs valid on all published revenue fares. This was one good thing that CO offered its top tier elites and of course now CO folks transiting over will miss them. :td:
|
Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
(Post 15157700)
Guess I'll just say it again for effect: shouldn't we save our ammo for E+?
|
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
(Post 15157343)
I really can't believe we have [conforming edit by moderator to original post] posting here today who can't see the clear devaluation of the Mileage Plus program that has been announced.
"Well, gee, they didn't take everything from you." Brilliant. That said, come on, really? We're talking about possibly missing an upgrade on two domestic round trips per year. And as for my [conforming edit by moderator] comments, please note that UA is not TAKING anything at all away from me. Nothing. They are GIVING a little less. The ball's in my court as to whether or not I will ACCEPT less. Period. I don't see it as catastrophic as other posters on this board. Your mileage obviously differs. |
Originally Posted by channa
(Post 15157563)
That, too, is inaccurate, as they're not upfaring you to discounted F fares, rather they're usually upfaring to higher economy fares.
They're aggressively marketing fee-waived upfares at checkin to people who bought economy fares to upfare to higher economy fares that they could instant-upgrade immediately. |
When did MileagePlus become the welfare program of the aviation industry? "Give Me! Give Me! Give Me!" It still maybe called United, but Continental is definitely calling the shots. And let's not forget that it was United that was going around, desparately looking for a merger partner. Just be thankful Doug Parker isn't calling the shots.
Be thankful that CR-1s are still remaining. It could have reverted to CO's policy of not offering them. Feel free to go over to AA where you'll get 8 SWUs at 100K; but just a sidenote, they don't have CR-1s and you're capped at 8 SWUs no matter how much flying you do above 100K. Or you can try your luck over at DL. I hear they just love paying M-fares to upgrade their international itineraries. Oh, and another thing, neither airline ofers E+. Well, there's always US. :D Welcome to the new tomorrow. The era of generous FF programs are over. It's all about generating revenue (even from the FF programs). With consolidation comes contraction. The fewer the airlines-- the fewer the competitors. The less of a need to "out-lavish" what the others offer. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:28 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.