Community
Wiki Posts
Search

F/As make out at 40000 ft

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2010, 11:11 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Originally Posted by 1111
Safety violation to photograph crew, be arrested at arrival airport.
They could have done it discretely.. Pull out the iPhone and click!


Originally Posted by 1111
Yes, they certainly should have taken off their clothes.
lol^
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2010, 11:14 pm
  #32  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
They could have done it discretely..
Then there would have been no problem.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2010, 11:23 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: BUR
Programs: UA 1MM, DL former Gold, AA, SPG, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 884
This would only bother me if they were doing it during dinner or cocktail service instead of taking care of the pax. If they were on break, so what? I am not offended by PDAs. If they really bothered me so I couldn't sleep I would probably have said something directly to them. I don't see the need to report them for something like this. The world could use a little more love and affection!
Seeksreal is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2010, 11:32 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Programs: United 1K 1MM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Hertz Prez
Posts: 250
Originally Posted by Seeksreal
The world could use a little more love and affection!
^ Same here. Put the earplugs in and the eye mask on and one last glass of wine and only dream of what might be, after all once one is married it is only a dream...
Flyingeagle is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:18 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Telluride, CO
Posts: 180
Originally Posted by unavaca
Why would the FAA care?
I'm not saying it is illegal, but the FAA does set some expectations of the job functions of cabin crew - and if they engage in behavior that compromises that it certainly is in the purview of the FAA to consider administrative sanction of that behavior. I think it is pretty reasonable to say that if two FAs are more obsessed with pleasuring their own desires on-the-job and disturbing passengers in the course of doing so that it isn't a wonderful statement of their commitment to being professionals committed to the execution of their duties. People get fired from less stressful/important jobs for lesser infractions.

If this was your business, would you like it or allow it? If you were charged with regulating an industry would you think it was acceptable for the first line of safety and security in that industry be more concerned with their own personal business (be it making out, playing around on their laptops on "crew scheduling software", or whatever else)?

Maybe you will answer yes to both or either of those, but that's not a world I'd like to fly in.

The FAs were not functioning as intended . A bit tounge in cheek on the sky kit, I certainly wasn't clear on that.

I'm not here to doubt the veracity of the OP. I'll assume they're being truthful and I'm not going to second guess them. I tend to believe things aren't always what they seem but also have a healthy respect that crazy things like this happen and no one speaks out to stop them (coworkers or passengers).

But yes, I think it's a serious enough issue that calls into my confidence in their ability to do their job. And, frankly, enough of a transgression of the contract inherent in my purchase of the ticket that UA will transport me in a professional manner that I will want it documented and addressed by the Capt and Station Manager so it does not become a "he said/she said' kind of situation like we have now where we're calling in to question the word of the OP.

Air Marshall deploy, local PD, TSA, and FBI get called to greet the plane before departure/on arrival when a guy wears a turban and looks a little too foreign for some xenophobic captain's/passenger's comfort level and my expectation that the cabin crew face corporate sanction through their internal management chain for obviously unbecoming conduct (if it really happened) is extreme? I think you're barking up the wrong tree of extremism.

If the OP was a troll/is exaggerating, then sure, my reaction would be a bit extreme, but in my book EX's 1957 posts kind of give him enough credibility I won't do that without some compelling reason to think otherwise.

My objection isn't specifically with them sucking face (although it is tacky and pretty classless on the job and in public, but to each their own), but with the implication that carries for how they carry out their duties and treat passengers in the course of said behavior. People management isn't about reading rules out of a book and applying them mechanically, and I tend to see this kind of behavior as a pretty clear indicator that there is some kind of issue getting in the way of someone's commitment to being a professional. I wouldn't tolerate an employee doing this - there would certainly be some kind of attempt at understanding why it happened and some kind of attempt to restore that confidence in their commitment to their work/professionalism.

If it doesn't feel right to your gut, it probably isn't right. If you can honestly say this is a total non-issue then we probably just differ on management style and how personal behavior interacts with ones ability to do ones job effectively. That's OK, but I really doubt most well-integrated members of a Western culture think there is nothing wrong with this situation.

I'll repose my questions from above:

If this was your business (e.g. United was your private business), would you think this was OK? Would it inspire confidence in your employees?

If you can answer yes to both or either of these questions, well, then, I don't think we'll find common ground. And that's OK.

Originally Posted by dgcpaphd
Speak to the captain?

Request the station manager to meet the aircraft?

And - - , ask for a Sky Kit.

Isn't the above a little extreme?

Things are not always as they appear. Particularly on a very long flight in a darkened cabin. Kicking (maybe accidentally bumping) the back of a passenger's seat does not mean the kicker is "making out" so to speak.

If such "making out" had been going on for up to "four hours" it seems that the purser or someone in charge would have known about the situation.

With all due respect, I think the alleged incident did not happen as reported.

Incidentally, what does a Sky Kit have to do with any of this? Just curious.
-

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Aug 21, 2010 at 6:36 am Reason: multi-quote
bmustaf is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:31 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United 1K, SPG Platinum
Posts: 69
is it unprofessional: yeah. would it bother me: no.

you've certainly got every right to report something that you feel injured you or amounted to bad service, but i tend just to let things like this roll off me. imho there are worse things in life than folks being affectionate in public.
booch is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:45 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Telluride, CO
Posts: 180
+1. Exactly.

Making out. Playing games on their phone. Swearing and/or proselytizing. Whatever. A hallmark of professionalism is the ability to separate such personal issues from your work.

When someone can't do that, it becomes a material barrier to their presentation as a professional. Invariably, that's a pretty serious question of their ability to do their job.

If they can't keep their hands, opinions, or boredom to themselves/in check then how do you really expect any rational individual to expect/trust/understand that they will or be able to keep more serious emotions/impulses under control when it matters?

Really, you can't. You can choose to not consider these questions, but there is very little rationale to argue that there isn't a serious credibility and suitabilty question when basic tenets of professionalism can't be upheld. Have a few DUIs? Forget getting a CDL or taking the bar. Get a few too many speeding tickets or even a bad reference? Forget being a police officer. Don't pay your credit cards? Forget getting your CPA. Happen to like the prescription meds a bit too much? Leave your MD at home. Hey, like that special "medicine" you can get in a few states these days? Pretty much write off any job that requires a drug test. All shining examples (al biet the DUI is a bit more extreme/serious) of where one's inability to separate otherwise pretty innocent/totally legal personal items from even being considered for a professional role. Making out is no crime, of course, but doing it on company time when you're representing the company certainly isn't copacetic. I'm not saying they should be fired or denied work like the previous examples, but it is certainly suspect and grounds for some kind of behavioral modification.

Why do people wear uniforms? They're not just about identifying personnel or because they look neat. It's about image, brand, and about demonstrating attention to a role. Dirty uniforms aren't acceptable in nearly any job (even ones where you uniform is routinely soiled, it is expected you clean it. I was a firefighter in a previous life. Bloody, smoky, spaghetti sauced, or otherwise soiled uniforms were cleaned not only for sanitary reasons but because it demonstrated our commitment to being competent professionals). I won't even get into how this situation is analogous to a dirty uniform .

I'm glad to hear a concurrent view on the topic. Yes, the world needs more affection, love, etc, etc. The world also needs people committed to doing their jobs professionally. You can be a good person and not carry on like a college aged freshman while doing your job quite easily. Millions of humans manage it on a daily basis!

But, most of all, if I wanted unruly, uncouth, or otherwise ridiculous FAs I'd either fly Southwest or Hooters Air. I think it's fair to say that I expected not to have to watch two people make out and be kicked by them (in the employ of the airline nonetheless) when I bought a ticket.
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
Report it. If they so unprofessional as to make out in public and kick you in the process, they are very likely unprofessional in other ways. Even if they never repeated this particular conduct, I wouldn't want them working any flight I'm on.

Last edited by bmustaf; Aug 21, 2010 at 12:55 am
bmustaf is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:52 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: TK Elite, QR Gold
Posts: 1,272
report it!!!!

this is totally unprofessional
Culture Guru is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 5:13 am
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
very unprofessional.



at least CO has the most professional men and women in the business (har har)

"Get a room"! its pretty ridiculous for them to do that in plain sight of everyone. I could maybe understand a discreet little peck here and there while most passengers were asleep.
entropy is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 5:25 am
  #40  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL/LAX/JFK
Programs: UA 1K(0.7MM) Hilton Gold/La Quinta Gold
Posts: 897
Originally Posted by EXLEFTSEAT
Should I report the lovebirds or let is slide?
Let it slide
Asuka is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 6:34 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: UA 1K; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Diamond; CCarlson Elite
Posts: 641
Originally Posted by dgcpaphd
I would not complain. It is a long flight and people, including the crew, get bored. Admittedly, their behavior was not consistent with what one would expect from a flight crew. However, would you rather be on a flight where the FAs are rude and cranky, which happens all too often?-
Hmmm. I wonder how far that kinda argument would go with other professions...

"Two teachers snogging in their office when they should be teaching or prepping lesson plans? I wouldn't complain - I'd rather have happy teachers and a little on-duty snogging than frustrated educators"

"Two Border Protection officers sucking face when they should be monitoring cross-border traffic? I wouldn't complain - it gets dull there in that office, and what's a few more illegals this way or that anyway?"

You should complain, OP. I absolutely guarantee that UA does not want that sorta stuff going on...
kcblakely is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 7:47 am
  #42  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Unprofessional behavior. But I'm not surprised that there is support for it.

Reporting it is a waste of time. He said/she said.

Unfortunately, given it was the purser, OP's options at the time were quite limited.

Complain while in the air? To who? The purser is the nut job violating the code of professionalism (written or not) and the rest of the cabin crew was supporting this violation (we don't even know just how cooperative the female FA was; she could have been coerced). He'll have OP arrested when the plane lands.

Take photos discreetly? And then what? If you submit those to UA, OP will be arrested for taking photos on the plane.

Find other witnesses, and then report it to a member of the cabin crew and then report it on the ground? Dicey because the cabin crew will separate the witnesses and work on each separately.

Fortunately this out of control purser didn't molest OP's Mrs. That would have forced the issue, with very negative consequences, all on OP and his Mrs.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 7:56 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Programs: UA 1K 2MM
Posts: 226
"Making out"?

Originally Posted by EXLEFTSEAT
...Mrs. EX and I were awakened about 7 hrs into the flight, as the ( we think ) male purser and a female F/A took the jumpseat opposite our exit seats in row 45 next to the galley and started making out for the next three or four hours. They moved a lot and frequently kicked my legs ( I am 6'4" ) which kept me from sleeping peacefully, although they apologized each and every time. But they were not at all embarrassed. All in full view of the pax and presumably with the approval of the rest of the crew who came by regularly to join the conversation, one male F/A changed places with the purser to receive his massage. The F/A who ran the galley looked out once and asked the question "so, when are you getting married?". By the way, the couple was in their 40s, I would guess...
We all have different ideas of what "making out" refers to. Could you be a bit more specific/explicit about what they were doing?

If you are not sure that one of the participants is male, how well could you see what is going on?

If it lasted 3-4 hours, then it likely wasn't too risqué.

If it was a conversation, then maybe they were just talking intimately.

If it was a "massage" (neck rub?) that could be shared with someone else who is presumably not her partner, then it sounds very innocent.

I think that the use of the phrase "making out" is triggering reactions based on people's imagining different scenarios, many of which may be far from the truth.
PERRL is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 8:04 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 121
bow chica wow wow
seamaster73 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2010, 8:10 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,358
Originally Posted by PERRL

We all have different ideas of what "making out" refers to. Could you be a bit more specific/explicit about what they were doing?

If you are not sure that one of the participants is male, how well could you see what is going on?

If it lasted 3-4 hours, then it likely wasn't too risqué.

If it was a conversation, then maybe they were just talking intimately.

If it was a "massage" (neck rub?) that could be shared with someone else who is presumably not her partner, then it sounds very innocent.

I think that the use of the phrase "making out" is triggering reactions based on people's imagining different scenarios, many of which may be far from the truth.
The voice of reason returns - thank you.

By the way, please recall that the OP stated that the alleged "making out" occurred while the two FAs were sitting on a jump seat! Probability says that the situation, as described, was highly overstated.
-

Last edited by dgcpaphd; Aug 21, 2010 at 8:23 am
dgcpaphd is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.