Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Were The Early 80's Really That Much Better On UA Than Now?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Were The Early 80's Really That Much Better On UA Than Now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2019, 6:17 pm
  #271  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA GS>1K>Nothing; DL DM 2MM; AS 75K>Nothing>MVP
Posts: 9,341
Regarding pitch, I look at it this way.

In general, you can get the same (or more) pitch now than in past for less money in real dollars, and..,

You now have the option of saving additional money by choosing a seat with less pitch.

To me that seems like an improvement....especially since most people seem to overwhelmingly prefer a less expensive seat with less pitch.
seat38a and dilanesp like this.
5khours is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2019, 11:10 pm
  #272  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
Originally Posted by findark
Yes? I'm not quite sure the level of sarcasm here - neither McDonalds nor Budweiser were ever in Soviet Russia.
Besides the 900 seat McDonald's opened in Moscow in 1990?
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2019, 11:47 pm
  #273  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Latin America and USA
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold
Posts: 456
It was after the early 80s, and it wasn't UA, but the discussion of paper tickets and 747s reminds me of a OneWorld RTW ticket I flew in late 2005 into early 2006. VLI-BNE on NF, SYD-BKK on QF, BKK-BOM on CX (my memory could be wrong, as I'm not sure why CX would fly BKK-BOM, but I'm pretty sure that was what it was), BOM-LHR on BA, LHR-JFK on BA, NYC-DEN on AA (can't remember if JFK or LGA), DEN-LAX-HNL on AA, and the ticket carried onwards to NAD and VLI, but I didn't finish flying the whole ticket, instead going to GUA from HNL via LAX.

Even in 2005, the tickets I had for that itinerary were paper tickets in a booklet with carbon copies. They were handwritten by the travel agency where I purchased the ticket. I kept it folded in half in the money belt I used at the time, and I had photocopies stored in my backpack in case something happened.

I remember being so pleasantly surprised by the food and service on that CX flight, which was my first time on CX. In Y I was offered a dinner choice of steak or fish. I asked if both were possible (I was younger then), and they smiled and said of course. Two hours later we were offered french dip sandwiches as a snack. And this flight was only 4:30 long!

Many 747s I flew in that era had a wonderful exit row window seat with no seat in front of it, but protected by a middle and aisle in the row in front. That meant you could still get up and walk right out to the lavatory if needed, but also had a window seat with tons of leg room and no reason for lurkers to bump your legs. Seemed to be around row 27 on the airlines I flew. Advanced seat assignments weren't a thing in those days, and back then I had a lot more time than money, so my strategy was always to show up 4ish hours early for any flight with a 747 so I could be first in the check-in line to request one of those seats. It worked every time I remember.

I was the same height I am today, but it sure felt like there was more legrooom in Y in those days than we have in E+ today. My memory could certainly be wrong. My shoulders sure don't fit as nicely in Y today as I remember they did back then.

I might still have that little booklet of tickets in a travel journal somewhere.
narvik and seat38a like this.

Last edited by IMissThe747; Dec 6, 2019 at 11:48 pm Reason: typo
IMissThe747 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2019, 12:26 pm
  #274  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Programs: UA
Posts: 104
Found this united catering operations video from the 90s:

Bonus Smisek cameo
st3, seat38a and rustykettel like this.
vaguba is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019, 9:45 pm
  #275  
Original Poster
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: IHG Spire, Hilton Honors Gold, Marriott Titanium, Mileage Plus Gold
Posts: 1,736
I think I remember as a kid that many of the airline catering trucks had Marriott on the sides of them. Whatever happened to Marriott's Airline Catering business.

Originally Posted by vaguba
Found this united catering operations video from the 90s:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7xxaquJEuE

Bonus Smisek cameo
Who says that. "I think the food was exceptional tonight" for inflight catering. I think its always been its OK or its Terrible.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Dec 9, 2019 at 1:34 am Reason: merged consecutive posts by same member
seat38a is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019, 10:44 pm
  #276  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
Originally Posted by seat38a
I think I remember as a kid that many of the airline catering trucks had Marriott on the sides of them. Whatever happened to Marriott's Airline Catering business.
Sold off, went bust, and now part of LSG Sky Chefs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caterair
rustykettel is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2019, 10:56 pm
  #277  
Original Poster
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: IHG Spire, Hilton Honors Gold, Marriott Titanium, Mileage Plus Gold
Posts: 1,736
Originally Posted by rustykettel
Sold off, went bust, and now part of LSG Sky Chefs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caterair
Looks like leveraged buyout strikes again.
seat38a is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 2:55 am
  #278  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
IMissThe747 Just taking a guess on the CX flight, but fifth freedom routings were a lot more common at the time (often as a legacy of having planes that couldn't go A-C and so had to stop at B).

As to in-flight catering (and food in general), I've noticed a broader trend towards "wackier" items pretty much everywhere. It was quaint and enjoyable at VX, but it's actually getting to be tiresome. There are more than a few times I'd prefer to have someone just sort out the seasoning on the meatloaf, veggies, and potatoes (not an airline example, but Amtrak did a nice meatloaf a few years back) and chuck the quinoa.
GrayAnderson is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 4:58 am
  #279  
Original Poster
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Denver, Colorado
Programs: IHG Spire, Hilton Honors Gold, Marriott Titanium, Mileage Plus Gold
Posts: 1,736
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
IMissThe747 Just taking a guess on the CX flight, but fifth freedom routings were a lot more common at the time (often as a legacy of having planes that couldn't go A-C and so had to stop at B).

As to in-flight catering (and food in general), I've noticed a broader trend towards "wackier" items pretty much everywhere. It was quaint and enjoyable at VX, but it's actually getting to be tiresome. There are more than a few times I'd prefer to have someone just sort out the seasoning on the meatloaf, veggies, and potatoes (not an airline example, but Amtrak did a nice meatloaf a few years back) and chuck the quinoa.
I agree, way too much quinoa these days. Bring back the rice and potatoes please!
rustykettel and IMissThe747 like this.
seat38a is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 6:23 am
  #280  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,888
Originally Posted by Long Zhiren
What airport was I in? Duty Free had home appliances in it. Dish washers, clothes washers, etc. I had a hard time understanding that. Yea. I'll take two of those as carry-on...
Was it Colombo, Sri Lanka?
Yes, that's Colombo. It's actually quite logical, you get a duty free allowance when coming (back) in the country so you can buy an appliance duty free and take it home.

Back on topic... Going back to the 80s, I still feel the food was better, In Y you actually got a decent meal which is no longer the case. In first and the old "Connoisseur" class, I still feel the food was better than with the exception of fish. The fish dishes today are really good, they used to be pretty awful.

It's hard to explain to someone who just started flying, maybe to the point of being inconceivable. In International FC United started the meal service with caviar. Transcontinental FC had two meal services, the second being a deli cart that featured jumbo boiled shrimp, smoked salmon, cold roast beef. I think if anyone saw that kind of meal on a United flight today they would keel over from the shock.
FlyingHighlander likes this.

Last edited by uanj; Dec 10, 2019 at 6:33 am
uanj is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 1:08 pm
  #281  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by uanj
It's hard to explain to someone who just started flying, maybe to the point of being inconceivable. In International FC United started the meal service with caviar. Transcontinental FC had two meal services, the second being a deli cart that featured jumbo boiled shrimp, smoked salmon, cold roast beef. I think if anyone saw that kind of meal on a United flight today they would keel over from the shock.
I don't have to go that far back. I recall - perhaps erroneously - that PS service when it first started (c2000) gave a decent cold plate upon arrival. Again, perhaps I am confusing the time frame and or flights...
spin88 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 2:25 pm
  #282  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: united
Posts: 1,636
Originally Posted by uanj

It's hard to explain to someone who just started flying, maybe to the point of being inconceivable. In International FC United started the meal service with caviar. Transcontinental FC had two meal services, the second being a deli cart that featured jumbo boiled shrimp, smoked salmon, cold roast beef. I think if anyone saw that kind of meal on a United flight today they would keel over from the shock.
One thing that perhaps makes me an outlier on FT is I don't think serving more food than one can eat is better service. A transcontinental west-to-east flight might run 5 hours. So we are talking about a gigantic 80's style first class meal that takes an hour to serve, including dessert and caviar, and then at the end of the flight, probably 3 hours after that meal service, we are going to be getting a whole bunch of deli meats? No thanks! The object of flying, even in F, is not to overeat as much as possible.

I think modern p.s. service serves more than enough food for the length of flight. They serve you a full meal complete with appetizer, salad, main course, bread, and dessert, and they serve it faster because nothing has to be carved off the cart, and then they offer you sandwiches or wraps at the end of the flight if you are still hungry. The only critique I would have is they should probably offer a breakfast before landing on the redeyes. But even that's kind of minor- you land at 6 or 7am and it's easy enough to go to an airport restaurant or even a UC for some breakfast.
dilanesp is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 5:02 pm
  #283  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: TPA for now. Hopefully LIS for retirement
Posts: 13,707
Originally Posted by uanj
Transcontinental FC had two meal services, the second being a deli cart that featured jumbo boiled shrimp, smoked salmon, cold roast beef.
The deli cart second service was only on flights that had breakfast as the main / first meal, not the (multi-course) lunch and dinner flights.
Bear96 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 6:20 pm
  #284  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Programs: UA
Posts: 104
And to think, if you were planning on taking the boeing stratocruiser to Hawaii you could have your own stateroom:

vaguba is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2019, 6:58 pm
  #285  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Federal Way, WA
Programs: Mileage Plus 2P, Marriott Silver, many others
Posts: 1,305
Originally Posted by jsloan
I suspect it was a matter of perspective. It’s now been about 40 years since deregulation; that was a completely different landscape.

For years, the Civil Aeronautics Board mandated that any given carrier offer either domestic or international service, but not both. United was a domestic carrier. After deregulation, the domestic carriers started trying to build out international service. Rather than being surprised that UA’s offerings were so “pathetic,” it’s probably more surprising that they were able to get as many flights as they did prior to the PanAm route acquisition. (PA’s post-deregulation approach didn’t work at all; I suspect it was easier to add international service to a domestic airline than vice versa).
Almost right. PA was strictly international (and, as pointed out, AK and HI were treated as international flights in all respects except Customs). TW and NW were both hybrids, even back in the 60s.
dliesse is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.