Better ua business lax-txl: stop ewr or lhr?
#46
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,470
I would beg to differ . . .while the seat on LX's 330s and 340s sucks, the seat on the LX 77W (which operates LAX-ZRH) is (IMO) much better than LH's.
#47
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
The only time I transited through TXL for international travel (it was outbound), it was by far the worst experience I have had. I'm not sure if it'd any better for inbound (EWR-TXL) traffic, but whatever you can do to minimize time in that godforsaken spot.
Also, even with access to LAX and EWR Polaris lounges, flying 2x 5-6 hour flights will not be pleasant on the body. Fly to Europe and ride in the back of the bus on one of the *A partners once you are there.
Also, even with access to LAX and EWR Polaris lounges, flying 2x 5-6 hour flights will not be pleasant on the body. Fly to Europe and ride in the back of the bus on one of the *A partners once you are there.
#48
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: HKG • Ex SFO, NYC
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Marriott Amb; Hyatt Globalist; Shangri-la Diamond; IHG SpireAmb; Hilton D; Accor G
Posts: 3,319
Another option to consider is flying to Germany's capital, Frankfurt, on LH in J (there's a non-stop from SAN). LH's J product is comparable (if not better) than UA's from my experience. You can then take a quick train ride to Berlin, Germany's population centre, of course after freshening up in the LH lounge on arrival in FRA. You might be able to get UA to even include the train portion since LH can ticket the German train portions!
I personally would not be caught dead in the Berlin airport. It's a real disaster zone in terms of facilities and everything else a real eye sore in the sea of German efficiency and quality. Here's to hoping that the new Berlin airport opens soon so that one day we can seriously call Berlin the capital of Germany!
Safe Travels,
James
I personally would not be caught dead in the Berlin airport. It's a real disaster zone in terms of facilities and everything else a real eye sore in the sea of German efficiency and quality. Here's to hoping that the new Berlin airport opens soon so that one day we can seriously call Berlin the capital of Germany!
Safe Travels,
James
Germany's capital is Berlin, not Frankfurt.
Tegel is quite nice in how small it is and how quick it is to board a flight.
To the OP… I would also consider that you get Polaris lounge in EWR
#49
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: HKG • Ex SFO, NYC
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Marriott Amb; Hyatt Globalist; Shangri-la Diamond; IHG SpireAmb; Hilton D; Accor G
Posts: 3,319
I really really really hate to say it, as a proud patriotic Swiss myself (see my username), but I find the LX hard product (on all their planes, 330, 340, 77W) to be incredibly cramped and hard to sleep on, unless you get a bulkhead. Also, the fact that their brand new J product still doesn't have all-aisle access is preposterous.
#50
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,470
I really really really hate to say it, as a proud patriotic Swiss myself (see my username), but I find the LX hard product (on all their planes, 330, 340, 77W) to be incredibly cramped and hard to sleep on, unless you get a bulkhead. Also, the fact that their brand new J product still doesn't have all-aisle access is preposterous.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,732
The OP said he likes a late departure and „later arrival“. Then LH via MUC is the way to go: great airport for transfers, no security check as in LHR, nice LH lounges in the satellite terminal and incredible frequency of flights to TXL in the evening if something goes wrong with the inbound LAX-MUC.
TXL is a great airport for arrivals but terrible for departures during rush hour, which is to be avoided.
TXL is a great airport for arrivals but terrible for departures during rush hour, which is to be avoided.
#52
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
The only time I transited through TXL for international travel (it was outbound), it was by far the worst experience I have had. I'm not sure if it'd any better for inbound (EWR-TXL) traffic, but whatever you can do to minimize time in that godforsaken spot.
Also, even with access to LAX and EWR Polaris lounges, flying 2x 5-6 hour flights will not be pleasant on the body. Fly to Europe and ride in the back of the bus on one of the *A partners once you are there.
Also, even with access to LAX and EWR Polaris lounges, flying 2x 5-6 hour flights will not be pleasant on the body. Fly to Europe and ride in the back of the bus on one of the *A partners once you are there.
#53
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 15
Thank you for this. We are going to Berlin in 2019 to visit my exchange daughter (who lives in Berlin). Flying into and out of TXL is the only thing that makes sense. This thread was scaring me! We are doing the EWR-TXL on a 764 (at least current schedule). I'm sure we'll be fine.
#54
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Thank you for this. We are going to Berlin in 2019 to visit my exchange daughter (who lives in Berlin). Flying into and out of TXL is the only thing that makes sense. This thread was scaring me! We are doing the EWR-TXL on a 764 (at least current schedule). I'm sure we'll be fine.
#55
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
OP here -- I don't love any airports, but I've always found TXL fine as far as they go. Old, old fashioned, but often much faster for it, and very nicely close to my destinations in the city. Arrivals there are fine. Perhaps a little more delay than usual, recently, getting bags, but not more than other destinations in my experience. Can get crowded if they're running behind because each gate or two has tiny baggage claim area, but fine.
Departure also fine in my experience.
Things I think it would be worse for:
* Transfers (I wouldn't think transfer through there very common, since I hadn't thought it was anything like a hub, but I don't know; I have never done it), since I would think you would always have to reclear security.
* Passing a long waiting time.
Departure also fine in my experience.
Things I think it would be worse for:
* Transfers (I wouldn't think transfer through there very common, since I hadn't thought it was anything like a hub, but I don't know; I have never done it), since I would think you would always have to reclear security.
* Passing a long waiting time.
#56
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SAN
Programs: 1K (since 2008), *G (since 1990), 1MM
Posts: 3,219
As it is an award ticket, and as someone mentioned upthread, LAX-FRA (LH) or SAN-FRA (LH) or LAX-LHR (UA) with the connection to TXL. I prefer one long flight with a shorter connection than two mid range flights, especially from the west coast on a red eye. If the lounge is Important to you LAX is preferable as you will have either Polaris or Star Alliance lounge. SAN will just be the UA club.
I dislike EWR, although to be fair it has been three years since I connected through there as every flight, I mean every flight was delayed or cancelled.
I like connecting through LHR and use the Arrivals lounge just outside customs and then reenter upstairs at Departures. I enjoy the walk. The Senator lounge is very nice (I find the UA club at LHR is a zoo most of the time and very noisy)
I like MUC for connections but have found immigration/security there is an issue due to some of the places I have traveled so tend to avoid MUC if I have other options, although am connecting through there next month
I flew Eurowings last month and it was fine. They are short flights with typical German efficiency. They have J - typical intra EU empty middle sear.
Enjoy your trip!
I dislike EWR, although to be fair it has been three years since I connected through there as every flight, I mean every flight was delayed or cancelled.
I like connecting through LHR and use the Arrivals lounge just outside customs and then reenter upstairs at Departures. I enjoy the walk. The Senator lounge is very nice (I find the UA club at LHR is a zoo most of the time and very noisy)
I like MUC for connections but have found immigration/security there is an issue due to some of the places I have traveled so tend to avoid MUC if I have other options, although am connecting through there next month
I flew Eurowings last month and it was fine. They are short flights with typical German efficiency. They have J - typical intra EU empty middle sear.
Enjoy your trip!
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,470
OP here -- I don't love any airports, but I've always found TXL fine as far as they go. Old, old fashioned, but often much faster for it, and very nicely close to my destinations in the city. Arrivals there are fine. Perhaps a little more delay than usual, recently, getting bags, but not more than other destinations in my experience. Can get crowded if they're running behind because each gate or two has tiny baggage claim area, but fine.
Departure also fine in my experience.
Departure also fine in my experience.
This is one airport where using the business class / *G check-in can be a life saver.
#58
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,911
LAX-LHR probably arrives too late to use the arrival lounge which is targeted for morning arrivals when you don't have a hotel room for a few more hours. As to LHR's UC, depending on ticket and elite level, it may be the only choice if your departing flight doesn't qualify for other lounges.
#59
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,394
To emphasize, the arrivals lounge is outside immigration, which means having to go through immigration into the UK then go back through both security and immigration if you are continuing on outside the UK. This can be done if you have a long enough layover, but is not the normal transit procedure. With normal transit, you would stay in sterile area and not go through immigration and thus have no access to the arrivals lounge.
#60
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SAN
Programs: 1K (since 2008), *G (since 1990), 1MM
Posts: 3,219
LAX-LHR probably arrives too late to use the arrival lounge which is targeted for morning arrivals when you don't have a hotel room for a few more hours. As to LHR's UC, depending on ticket and elite level, it may be the only choice if your departing flight doesn't qualify for other lounges.
I keep forgetting I am *G so have access to all the *A lounges at LHR. As the OP is going to TXL, the LH lounge is closest to the departure gate. If there is only access to UA then it is a nice walk across to the UA Club and back again, but note on the way back it is all walking as no moving walkway and you need to use the elevators to get back up to the departure gate - all doable but a bit confusing the first time. However, if too late for the Arrivals lounge and going onto TXL, then UA Club is a great option for the shower.
To emphasize, the arrivals lounge is outside immigration, which means having to go through immigration into the UK then go back through both security and immigration if you are continuing on outside the UK. This can be done if you have a long enough layover, but is not the normal transit procedure. With normal transit, you would stay in sterile area and not go through immigration and thus have no access to the arrivals lounge.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Dec 19, 2018 at 11:11 am Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member