UA's Boarding Process with WILMA now - Inconsistent process / PreBoarding issues
#166
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,051
#167
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MFR
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,885
#168
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,721
I realize not a big deal at non-hubs but it’s literally half the plane preboarding and group 1 at SFO on every flight I’ve taken except UAX and international.
It would cost nothing for UA to add 2 more numbers and board GS/F in group 1, 1K in group 2 and current group 1->3 and then 4-7.
UA clearly doesn’t know there is a problem, knows but doesn’t care, thinks GAs and/or passengers are too dumb to handle 7 groups (though WN and AA have more) or just plain stubborn. I’m betting on “doesn’t care”
It would cost nothing for UA to add 2 more numbers and board GS/F in group 1, 1K in group 2 and current group 1->3 and then 4-7.
UA clearly doesn’t know there is a problem, knows but doesn’t care, thinks GAs and/or passengers are too dumb to handle 7 groups (though WN and AA have more) or just plain stubborn. I’m betting on “doesn’t care”
#169
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SW Michigan, ex SF Bay Area
Posts: 831
Seems appropriate to do it that way. It feels odd to pay for a first class ticket and have to stand around waiting for all these other groups (lowercase "g") to board first. But I go with the flow, trying to stay out of the way while not missing my turn. Sometimes I don't worry about it, leisurely walking to the gate and boarding whenever I feel like it, sometimes last.
#170
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,855
While I agree it makes the most sense to renumber and drop "pre-boarding" the uproar for GS and 1Ks would be deafening. It would be considered a huge downgrade. While it would not change went they get on the plane, their specialiness would be insulted by a set boarding groups vs the uber-special "preboarding"
Too many measure their self-worth by their boarding group.
UA has created a monster that I suspect they would like to undue but can not.
Too many measure their self-worth by their boarding group.
UA has created a monster that I suspect they would like to undue but can not.
#171
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,597
While I agree it makes the most sense to renumber and drop "pre-boarding" the uproar for GS and 1Ks would be deafening. It would be considered a huge downgrade. While it would not change went they get on the plane, their specialiness would be insulted by a set boarding groups vs the uber-special "preboarding"
Too many measure their self-worth by their boarding group.
UA has created a monster that I suspect they would like to undue but can not.
Too many measure their self-worth by their boarding group.
UA has created a monster that I suspect they would like to undue but can not.
#172
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,855
Don't you think 1Ks would howl about losing their pre-boarding? Having to board with the unanointed non-elite first class or plats? It would be viewed as a major downgrade.
#173
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Programs: UA (1K, 2MM), AA, Avis, National
Posts: 867
I realize not a big deal at non-hubs but it’s literally half the plane preboarding and group 1 at SFO on every flight I’ve taken except UAX and international.
It would cost nothing for UA to add 2 more numbers and board GS/F in group 1, 1K in group 2 and current group 1->3 and then 4-7.
UA clearly doesn’t know there is a problem, knows but doesn’t care, thinks GAs and/or passengers are too dumb to handle 7 groups (though WN and AA have more) or just plain stubborn. I’m betting on “doesn’t care”
It would cost nothing for UA to add 2 more numbers and board GS/F in group 1, 1K in group 2 and current group 1->3 and then 4-7.
UA clearly doesn’t know there is a problem, knows but doesn’t care, thinks GAs and/or passengers are too dumb to handle 7 groups (though WN and AA have more) or just plain stubborn. I’m betting on “doesn’t care”
There will be an interesting side-effect. GAs will have to explain to UA credit card holders that "priority boarding" means group 4. Saying this with a straight face will require some training.
#174
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Coast NSW, Australia
Programs: UA and SQ; Hilton, Fairmont, Marriott, Rydges Priority
Posts: 290
As a ‘lowly’ group 4 boarder I felt the system worked well in the four domestic legs I recently took…..the first in three years.
Seeing gate staff refuse boarding to those ‘trying it’ out of sequence was a nice touch.
And I always got overhead space near my seat.
True I wasn’t aware of any rough and tumble of the initial groups but the behaviour of my fellow group 4ers was exemplary. Airports: LGA, ORD, DEN and FSD (where mid west courtesy always reigns).
Seeing gate staff refuse boarding to those ‘trying it’ out of sequence was a nice touch.
And I always got overhead space near my seat.
True I wasn’t aware of any rough and tumble of the initial groups but the behaviour of my fellow group 4ers was exemplary. Airports: LGA, ORD, DEN and FSD (where mid west courtesy always reigns).
#175
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,509
1K, self boarders, DYKWIA pax and GAs are all contributing to the normally chaotic boarding process that is of UA. There is a reason UA has the longest scheduled boarding time.
#176
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SFO, TPE, HNL
Programs: UA GS 4MM, RCC life member (paid), Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, CLEAR
Posts: 1,822
In the early days after the merger, UA boarding suddenly became much more chaotic compared to pre-merger. There was a meeting of elite flyers and UA executives, and someone asked why not bring back the red carpet lane because it worked greatly before. Jeff Smisek responded immediately: "Red is not in our vocabulary!" As long as JS was concerned, blue was the only noble color and red was to be eliminated forever. As of today I still could not understand why he had such hatred on pmUA's red color.
You are absolutely correct. Kirby has decided on a strategy to enhance the prestige value of 1K to as high as possible. The psychological heads of 1Ks must be inflated to as big as possible. Tactics including hiding or removing the GS sign at some check in counters. In Taipei I did not know where to line up because the highest counter position was 1K. Making 1K the last subgroup of preboarding was entirely for this purpose, and the success of this strategy is becoming clearer now. I have observed more than a few times after the GA calls preboarding, older-age GSs (including myself) being pushed aside by younger, more physically fit 1Ks.
You are absolutely correct. Kirby has decided on a strategy to enhance the prestige value of 1K to as high as possible. The psychological heads of 1Ks must be inflated to as big as possible. Tactics including hiding or removing the GS sign at some check in counters. In Taipei I did not know where to line up because the highest counter position was 1K. Making 1K the last subgroup of preboarding was entirely for this purpose, and the success of this strategy is becoming clearer now. I have observed more than a few times after the GA calls preboarding, older-age GSs (including myself) being pushed aside by younger, more physically fit 1Ks.
Last edited by PanAmWT; Nov 25, 2022 at 2:10 am
#177
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: EWR/SNA/SUN
Programs: United 1K; Marriott Titanium
Posts: 499
Just like my toddler howls when you take a toy away from him. Then again, in my opinion, paid first should not board with G1, they should be boarding ahead of elites, if not with them.
#178
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 5,000
Damn right! Even though I am a 1K, I believe that those who actually pay for F should board first. I like flying on AA with no elite status because paid F boards early, behind only CK.
#179
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,597
UA hit a gold mine when it learned how to monetize the front cabin. Then they got greedy and decided to sell free baggage and early boarding as “elite” perks, and the result is the mess that is UA’s boarding process of today.
#180
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,051
Perhaps a special 1K preboard line or waiting area?