Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Reintroducing Early Boarding for Families with Children

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
View Poll Results: Is the change to early boarding for families w/children 2 or under a good move by UA?
Like the change and it will improve boarding time
72
9.68%
Like the change but it will not improve boarding time
67
9.01%
Dislike the change but it will improve boarding time
16
2.15%
Dislike the change and it will not improve boarding time
454
61.02%
Could support a different change and it will improve boarding time
23
3.09%
Could support a different change but it will not improve boarding time
22
2.96%
Neutral but it will improve boarding times
15
2.02%
Neutral but it will not improve boarding times
75
10.08%
Voters: 744. You may not vote on this poll

Reintroducing Early Boarding for Families with Children

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:13 pm
  #121  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,814
Originally Posted by tryathlete
I remember making 1K for the first time about a decade ago. Finally I get to get out of the boarding area and into my seat sooner than later. Then El Jeffe and GS (supposedly an invisible elite group) comes out of the woodwork and puts 1K down a notch. Then uniformed Military personnel were moved in front of me. Now families with small children. What next, anxious passengers or those on prescribed medications? My thoughts--F, GS, 1K-- short break for small children families, then
1-2-3-4-5. I totally get the persons with disabilities going first. Let me on the damn plane, will you? I have to do this 50-100 times a year. I don't need more time in line.

Let's assume the pre boarding of this new group takes 3-5 minutes. Do the math. That's 4-8 more hours per year I waste standing in line versus being in the comfort of my paid seat. (Rant Over).
Reminds me of this:

What happened to the new boarding system they were testing at ORD? Looks like they took down the screens when I was there yesterday.
edcho is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:17 pm
  #122  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: Delta Silver. Former AA gold. UA MP and DL Plat AMEX cardholder
Posts: 1,254
IIRC, didn't they have families with small children and disabled before GS/1K back in 2012 and retracted it quickly when there was an outcry from elites? Or am I confusing this with something else?
REPUBLIC757 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:19 pm
  #123  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by tryathlete
I remember making 1K for the first time about a decade ago. Finally I get to get out of the boarding area and into my seat sooner than later. Then El Jeffe and GS (supposedly an invisible elite group) comes out of the woodwork and puts 1K down a notch. Then uniformed Military personnel were moved in front of me. Now families with small children. What next, anxious passengers or those on prescribed medications? My thoughts--F, GS, 1K-- short break for small children families, then
1-2-3-4-5. I totally get the persons with disabilities going first. Let me on the damn plane, will you? I have to do this 50-100 times a year. I don't need more time in line.

Let's assume the pre boarding of this new group takes 3-5 minutes. Do the math. That's 4-8 more hours per year I waste standing in line versus being in the comfort of my paid seat. (Rant Over).
By El Jeffe are you referring to Smisek? Guess what, GS came along WAYYYY before Jeff. Even WAYYY before the merger.
Baze is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:24 pm
  #124  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SIN
Programs: UA Mileage Plus, Hilton Honors
Posts: 38
I support this move. It is not easy trying to carry your own carry-ons, infant's stuff and the infant itself while waiting for a person in front blocking the aisle area (choosing where to load bags, chit chatting etc) to get to your seat.
Other airlines have done it for years but mostly let their top tier elite or premium classes pass thru first.
yeekin is online now  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:26 pm
  #125  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Programs: UA -GS 4.5 MM, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 116
Disenfranching frequent flyers once again

Originally Posted by UA Insider
Hi everyone,

As we committed last fall, we have been looking closely at every aspect of our customers’ travel experience to see where we can improve and eliminate points of stress. Customers and employees pointed to the boarding process, just as many of you have, as an area where they wanted to see improvements; many shared that the boarding process for all customers would be smoother if we could accommodate families with infants earlier, as they often need more time to board.

All of us have experienced being the customer in the jet bridge tending to an infant, a diaper bag and a stroller – or to being the person in line to board behind that customer. Resuming pre-boarding for families with infants should provide a smoother process for everyone.

As a result, look for early boarding for families with children aged two and under beginning Monday, February 15, 2016. The new boarding process will be, in order: People with disabilities, active-duty members of the military in uniform, families with small children, and Global Services, followed by boarding groups 1-5.

Thank you,

-UA Insider
Another disappointing move by UA. They continue to disenfranchise their frequent fliers.
feobrien is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:26 pm
  #126  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by REPUBLIC757
IIRC, didn't they have families with small children and disabled before GS/1K back in 2012 and retracted it quickly when there was an outcry from elites? Or am I confusing this with something else?
I am probably mixed up, but I recall pmUA allowing early boarding. I flew UA and did it with my kids. I then recall UA doing away with it c2012. But perhaps it was earlier.

I get the folks who only fly UA and pmCO, and who don't know that boarding can actually work, for them anything is a take away. But what I don't understand is the angst from some folks here who fly OALs, and in particular Delta, which does early boarding and where boarding in general (two lines, like pmUA) goes well. Perhaps you put this over United's current dysfunctional SW style "line up" boarding style and it does not work, but I see this as a small change, that removes a major issue for a few people, hopefully helps speed things up at the margins, and perhaps is a precursor to totally redoing the boarding process.

p.s. and my "major issue" is that I often see P.O.ed people upset about this posting on UA's facebook page, and have heard people get into it with GA as in "well every other airline lets me." Being the airline that hates on people with kids is sort of like being the airline that breaks guitars. Its un-American! And I'm happy to see them remove a potential PR issue at some point.
spin88 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:28 pm
  #127  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriot LT, Accor P
Posts: 6,318
Originally Posted by porciuscato
I agree with most of the posters here: this is a SPECTACULARLY BAD IDEA.

It was only a few years ago that I was boarding with 3 tiny kids. So I can say from experience: the last thing you want is to have the kids on the plane for an extra hour.

If they pre-board, it's usually at least 90 minutes before they will be allowed to get up. That's bad for them and bad for everyone around them. Kids should board last, not first.
+1 - Logically one would think that this is the right thing to do for families that need "extra time" (and I have six kids). However, in practice this never works, and the boarding process is actually slowed down and everyone loses.

There are several reasons for it but it all comes down to one thing - the lack of consistent enforcement and process by UA and a severe lack of gate personnel. It starts at the top (management) with a grand pronouncement of a program, but then little actual operational details are shared with employees that are understaffed, who then decide to "enforce" the program with little consistency, and we end up with the UA cluster of today....

Over the last few weeks I've been all over the middle east and APAC flying UA and other carriers and I noticed that although they also allow families with infants to board first they do it differently than UA does - they do it properly! They escort the elderly and families down to the plane (at least on SQ and NH where I was actually there to see it) - and then they come back and start boarding (I actually saw on NH employee almost running back up the jetbridge to begin boarding). They also probably make sure they take their assigned seats as well. Finally, they also seem to have a lot more folks to help out with boarding - and since obviously UA doesn't have enough people at the gate to do this new process properly perhaps they shouldn't try it at all...
bmwe92fan is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:32 pm
  #128  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Oh great. They have like a million carryons. There goes all the bin space.
milepig is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:47 pm
  #129  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SAN
Posts: 148
Also, I suggest send feedback to 1k/gs voices or post at united air time on this....

so UA might re-consider this?
thinthin is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 5:54 pm
  #130  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DAB
Programs: DL PM UA PSilver Marriott Lifetime Plat, AMEX Platinum, Avis PC, UA MPPPlus
Posts: 961
This is unfortunate news for anyone who flys in or out of MCO.
edweird is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 6:16 pm
  #131  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Suburban Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,392
Originally Posted by milepig
Oh great. They have like a million carryons. There goes all the bin space.
Exactly what I was thinking as I read this.

Not to mention every kettle with a kid under 5 will try to pass them off as a 2 year old in order to board first.

I wonder why UA would make a supposedly flyer-friendly change that caters to kettles and leaves their bread and butter FF's hanging.
Cargojon is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 6:18 pm
  #132  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by edcho
What happened to the new boarding system they were testing at ORD? Looks like they took down the screens when I was there yesterday.
good point. this can't be the winning solution from what was tested at the experimental gate.

i would expect a more significant revamp of the boarding process at some point this year; hopefully feedback from this thread is considered.
riphamilton is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 6:24 pm
  #133  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,722
As a parent of small children I get where they are coming from. Children have a tough time waiting in lines and it's probably better for everyone to have them settled quickly. However this creates another problem in that familes (like disabled people) can often take a long long time to board, particularly those with <2 who have gate-checked strollers, etc.

The best option would be to have everyone who needs extra time board last but that would not really resolve the problem as elites with families would board normally and the delays would simply be spread out through the current process (as is currently the case).

Alas there does not appear to be a solution that optimizes every objective (fast boarding, elite carry-on priority, family needs). As UA is already boarding disabled passengers first, so the families might as well maximize efficiency of the same time (in fact should probably board first).

Originally Posted by halls120
You haven't seen the size of some of these families, have you?
The solution is to copy WN and limit each underage child to 1 parent, though this may be counterproductive with babies, etc. where it's more efficient for one parent to hold the infant while the other folds up the stroller...

Originally Posted by avi8tir
GS should be before any families... this is BS. GS flyers are likely some of the quickest and most efficient boarders... now we have to deal with strollers??

LAME!!
I tend to agree (and would add 1Ks), except that the GS and 1Ks are often a significant contingent @ hubs, which would then defeat the purpose. I've often seen 20 GS and 60 1Ks boarding popular routes @SFO.

Originally Posted by fly18725
I honestly can't believe that families with small children (those under 2 or with car seats) are going to take all of the overhead space.
^ ^ ^ Bingo, we have a winner.

Families with children <2 tend to check suitcases and do not bring large carryons as a general matter, because their hands are full with diaper bags, activity & food bags, etc. plus strollers.

The real problem, as noted above, is more with families that have 1 infant and many older children.
Boraxo is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 6:28 pm
  #134  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: LA
Posts: 1,281
Originally Posted by Boraxo
I've often seen 20 GS and 60 1Ks boarding popular routes @SFO.
60 1K's, what did you do, request to see everyone's boarding passes to make sure they are 1K? The only thing you could potentially tell from the boarding process is if they were GS. 1K's are mixed into a very large group 1, which includes plats and F. In that case, I could believe 60 in group 1, but there is no way to break out exactly 60 1Ks unless you get access to UA system to verify passengers or ask to see boarding passes.
dank0014 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2016, 6:33 pm
  #135  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
If the rule for is enforced, then I don't see a big issue. Of course, it never is enforced and we'll see the litany of family boarding with children of all kinds.

If this happens, I'll just avoid UA. Not worth paying to fly F with them.
Visconti is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.