FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   North TATL 757 fuel stops / diversion delays [2015] (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1642696-north-tatl-757-fuel-stops-diversion-delays-2015-a.html)

fgirard Jan 5, 2015 12:54 pm


Originally Posted by Owenc (Post 24106207)
Well that is a little different as the plane only has 30 or so people on board..

The PrivatAir 737 has 44 seats--close though :D


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 24106195)
You also need to look at the wind effect.

The BFS delay seem to be more than just a jetstream issue but a problem at EWR as it was arriving. Based on past history that was a anomaly and probably should not be of general concern.

The regular fuel stop issue for UA is the Northern European cities

And ex-LIS, BCN and MAD (sometimes), however, UA63 was cancelled due to maintenance, so it didn't need to make a stop today.

I'm also wondering how they are picking the NATs for the 752s.

SunLover Jan 5, 2015 1:06 pm

No room at the inn...
 

Originally Posted by milepig (Post 24105831)
My guess is that UA figured out that on-time is good enough and they're slowing planes down to conserve fuel rather than going full throttle and arriving early.

My guess is that it is primarily due to slot control. Think landing queues and gate availability.


SunLover

fgirard Jan 5, 2015 1:14 pm

It seems that from UA65, they were taking a southern track via Santa Maria Oceanic and about 2/3 across the Atlantic and then switched destinations to BGR. This could be very well attributable to slot control as UA operations could send a message via CPDLC to get a re-clearance if they didn't have a place to put UA65 when it got to EWR.

http://i.imgur.com/JmkYRB8l.png

milepig Jan 5, 2015 1:26 pm

Crossing my fingers, I've not been on one of these diverted flights. If truly pre-planned, when do they inform the pax? At the gate before departure, upon takeoff during the normal pilot announcements, or later?

cesco.g Jan 5, 2015 1:36 pm


Originally Posted by milepig (Post 24105831)
My guess is that UA figured out that on-time is good enough and they're slowing planes down to conserve fuel rather than going full throttle and arriving early.

Arriving early has its kinks too:

I do not ever remember arriving early like in FRA and docking at a gate. Typically it's waiting after leaving then runway and eventually parking at an off-tarmac positions with climbing stairs planeside and bus rides. Inconvenient & time-consuming exercises in and itself, often pulverising the early arrival advantage, and worse - resulting in delays reaching terminals/connecting flights.

goalie Jan 5, 2015 2:31 pm


Originally Posted by Owenc (Post 24105716)
Is there even anything at goosebay lol?

Geese? (and I don't mean the stranded pax) ;)

restlessinRNO Jan 5, 2015 2:33 pm


Originally Posted by milepig (Post 24106451)
Crossing my fingers, I've not been on one of these diverted flights. If truly pre-planned, when do they inform the pax? At the gate before departure, upon takeoff during the normal pilot announcements, or later?

When I flew TXL-EWR last month, it was in the plane, prior to take-off. Too late to make other arrangements then, of course. :)

clubord Jan 5, 2015 2:46 pm


Originally Posted by fgirard (Post 24106376)
It seems that from UA65, they were taking a southern track via Santa Maria Oceanic and about 2/3 across the Atlantic and then switched destinations to BGR. This could be very well attributable to slot control as UA operations could send a message via CPDLC to get a re-clearance if they didn't have a place to put UA65 when it got to EWR.

http://i.imgur.com/JmkYRB8l.png

Has nothing to do with slot control.

Longer Europe/US flights are "re-dispatched" at an enroute point. You are planned to have X amount of fuel at a given point based on the forecasted winds prior to takeoff.

Once you get to that designated point if you have more than the required gas you continue to EWR, if not you stop for gas. You only know how much gas you'll have when you get there, thus the enroute diversion, like your example.

I've been flying these Atlantic 756 routes exclusively for almost 6 years now. Diverted 4 times for fuel.

Owenc Jan 5, 2015 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by clubord (Post 24106957)
Has nothing to do with slot control.

Longer Europe/US flights are "re-dispatched" at an enroute point. You are planned to have X amount of fuel at a given point based on the forecasted winds prior to takeoff.

Once you get to that designated point if you have more than the required gas you continue to EWR, if not you stop for gas. You only know how much gas you'll have when you get there, thus the enroute diversion, like your example.

I've been flying these Atlantic 756 routes exclusively for almost 6 years now. Diverted 4 times for fuel.

Are you a United captain?

clubord Jan 5, 2015 3:00 pm


Originally Posted by Owenc (Post 24106989)
Are you a United captain?

Not in this plane, was a B737 CA prior to merger.

Currently First Officer on 757/767.

Owenc Jan 5, 2015 3:34 pm

alright ok so you are the one with the experience then.

bmwe92fan Jan 5, 2015 4:26 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 24105871)
+1 and offseting the higher fuel usage of the ex-Europe flights.

Also - some airports have restrictions for landing times & slots for arrivals - so no point in being early... A few months ago our captain came on the PA and said we had to slow down coming in to FRA from ORD - and then were put in a holding pattern - as we were not allowed to land that early (this was the 5:45am arrival). We finally landed about 5:15am. I also believe that this is true for other airports in the UK as well...

nwff Jan 6, 2015 5:04 am

1/5 ua0055 cdg > ewr
 
Diverted to BGR, delayed departure, crew timed out. Still there this morning. Today's flight is scheduled to be diverted to BGR, too.

JDT1955 Jan 6, 2015 8:59 am


Originally Posted by nwff (Post 24110434)
Diverted to BGR, delayed departure, crew timed out. Still there this morning. Today's flight is scheduled to be diverted to BGR, too.

What's odd is that the flight that went out this morning (2074) didn't use the plane that came in from CDG yesterday (3130) but rather 3140, which was ferried up empty from IAD late last night. I wondered if the original plane had an mx problem, which delayed departure too far for the pilots (the web site shows the canceled continuation originally scheduled for 2AM this morning), but then they couldn't fix it and needed a new plane. Not particularly confidence inspiring...

PV_Premier Jan 6, 2015 10:14 am

1/6 diversions that I found:

UA123 (LHR-IAD) to BGR (also 3 hours late out of LHR)
UA63 (MAD-EWR) to BGR (departed 45 mins late from MAD)
UA65 (LIS-EWR) to YQX (departed 2hr 20 mins late from LIS)

As mentioned above UA55 is also headed to BGR and left CDG around 50 mins late


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:54 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.