Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United narrows Q3 PRASM Guidance - analyst expects them to lead Q4 PRASM growth

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United narrows Q3 PRASM Guidance - analyst expects them to lead Q4 PRASM growth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2014, 10:02 am
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
Interesting that they up the guidance like 2 weeks before presenting the actual numbers ...............
Let's see. Q3 earnings report should shed some more light on many of the issues discussed here.
cesco.g is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 10:38 am
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by cesco.g
Interesting that they up the guidance like 2 weeks before presenting the actual numbers ...............
That's very concerning, and not the first time they've done it. Change guidance after the quarter is already over?

It's like they don't know what's going on until they dismount the reel-to-reel tape from the SHARES machine and offload the data to start crunching it.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 11:03 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by channa
That's very concerning, and not the first time they've done it. Change guidance after the quarter is already over?

It's like they don't know what's going on until they dismount the reel-to-reel tape from the SHARES machine and offload the data to start crunching it.
So you are saying that good news is bad news, if UA did not know that the good news was coming?

I do agree - Predictability and 'knowing your business' are important to Wall Street.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 11:15 am
  #49  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
Originally Posted by channa
That's very concerning, and not the first time they've done it. Change guidance after the quarter is already over?
That isn't uncommon. UA is a huge corporation. The revenue is the easy part. How you deal with all the capital cost, expenses, depreciation, deferred revenue, takes a lot time.

Once the numbers were final - the CFO probably said, wow - the numbers are much better than we expected, we should let the street know.
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 12:36 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by HNLbasedFlyer
That isn't uncommon. UA is a huge corporation. The revenue is the easy part. How you deal with all the capital cost, expenses, depreciation, deferred revenue, takes a lot time.

Once the numbers were final - the CFO probably said, wow - the numbers are much better than we expected, we should let the street know.
To be clear: guidance wasn't updated, it was narrowed. This exactly what Delta and AA did and is a normal practice for quarter end guidance.

{comments not contributing to the discussion removed}

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Oct 10, 2014 at 1:51 pm Reason: comments not contributing to the discussion removed
fly18725 is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 1:16 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by sinoflyer
... the desire of some people who continue to try and find bad news from an unarguably good set of numbers is beyond pointless. ...
It's more useful to discuss long term strategy. Like, is this cutting to optimize margins in the best interests of shareholders? And, is the overall strategy going to place them in a strong or weak position for future based on competitive and industry trends? The discussion of short term quarterly results is less important, but has shed light on and quantified the extent to which mismanagement of the takeover destroyed shareholder value. The losses and the lagging PRASM data until today shows a significant and measurable failure to perform. This quarter's data shows that they might have finally hit bottom, but that alone is far less useful than evaluating how this strategy impacts long term prospects. And, we still need a deeper analysis of the data to understand how to interpret it. Where's spin these days?

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
I do agree - Predictability and 'knowing your business' are important to Wall Street.
'Knowing your business' is a requirement to be a competent manager, with or without Wall Street.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 1:19 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by fly18725
To be clear: guidance wasn't updated, it was narrowed.
Good point. Maybe the thread title should be changed.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 1:20 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
Originally Posted by channa
That's very concerning, and not the first time they've done it. Change guidance after the quarter is already over?

It's like they don't know what's going on until they dismount the reel-to-reel tape from the SHARES machine and offload the data to start crunching it.
With all the controls and regulations on disclosure, every company is deliberately vague about guidance vs the precision they see internally. The delay between end of quarter and reporting public results is when that truing up happens.

And as gets underway some choose to refine it.

My guess is 4Q will be tough for anyone to read for UA or AA because of the Chicago ATC issues.

But nice to see 3Q delivering - the front line certainly feels in a better mood lately.

Rebooking to Delta on a recent Chicago ATC delay took a Club agent less than 2 minutes, and that was while handling guests checking in.

The country needs more than 3 strong airlines, and happy to see this continue.
cerealmarketer is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 1:54 pm
  #54  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
Originally Posted by channa
Good point. Maybe the thread title should be changed.
Good idea -- will do.

WineCountryUA
UA coModerator
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 4:04 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 75
Originally Posted by cerealmarketer
Quote:





Originally Posted by channa


That's very concerning, and not the first time they've done it. Change guidance after the quarter is already over?

It's like they don't know what's going on until they dismount the reel-to-reel tape from the SHARES machine and offload the data to start crunching it.




With all the controls and regulations on disclosure, every company is deliberately vague about guidance vs the precision they see internally. The delay between end of quarter and reporting public results is when that truing up happens.

And as gets underway some choose to refine it.

My guess is 4Q will be tough for anyone to read for UA or AA because of the Chicago ATC issues.

But nice to see 3Q delivering - the front line certainly feels in a better mood lately.

Rebooking to Delta on a recent Chicago ATC delay took a Club agent less than 2 minutes, and that was while handling guests checking in.

The country needs more than 3 strong airlines, and happy to see this continue.
I think the country has 4 strong airlines (including WN), and a good subset of smaller carriers in JetBlue, Virgin, and Spirit.

We had more strong carriers 10 years ago and they were all going into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. When all of the industry participants are showing sub 15% profit margins, that leads me to believe that there is plenty of competition. Having airlines that make reasonable profits and are healthy is superior to having a fragmented market where they all rotate in and out of bankruptcy every 15 years.
g-code is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2014, 9:37 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: WN, AA, UA, DL
Posts: 1,313
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Can't really take you seriously when you make this claim - I know you have a strange defense of UA, but be real :-:
Let's turn the tables, what would you call a steady decline in Y-O-Y PRASM results? What once were rising increases of 6, 8, 10% have declined to now 4, 2, or maybe 0. Is it gaining momentum? Sustaining momentum? That make sense? Of course not.

Originally Posted by 3Cforme
You're arguing that short-distance travelers have fewer alternatives than long-distance travelers? Good luck with that.
That wasn't the point, but thanks for making another one in the same direction. As a whole, long-distance travelers do have more choice of airlines with reasonable itineraries.

Originally Posted by PV_Premier
anyone who honestly believes DL is losing momentum should have their head examined. in my opinion, DL is kicking tail and taking names when it comes to demanding higher fares and providing a superior customer experience along with it.
See my first reply above. What would be delusional is saying otherwise.
minnyfly is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 6:25 am
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Originally Posted by minnyfly
Let's turn the tables, what would you call a steady decline in Y-O-Y PRASM results? What once were rising increases of 6, 8, 10% have declined to now 4, 2, or maybe 0. Is it gaining momentum? Sustaining momentum? That make sense? Of course not.
Might help for you to read a pair of the most recent earning results for each airline:

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....cle&ID=1950822

http://ir.delta.com/files/doc_financ...001_d91h87.pdf

[Moderator edit]

Guessing you've also missed all the talk about WN's struggles lately...definitely not an airline leading the way at the moment.

[Moderator edit]

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Oct 11, 2014 at 8:51 am Reason: Moderator edit to de-personalize comments and comply with FT Rule 12.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 8:19 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
[Above links are] to 2Q14 results when the discussion is about momentum in 3Q14.

Although AA and Delta are not going to post bad earnings, their unit revenue growth momentum has slowed, or in the case of AA, disappeared, in 3Q while UAL's strengthened.

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Oct 11, 2014 at 8:47 am Reason: Moderator edit to comply with FT Rule 12
fly18725 is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 8:54 am
  #59  
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA Plat/2MM [23-yr. 1K, now emeritus] clawing way back to WN-A List; MR LT Titanium; HY Whateverist.
Posts: 12,396
Moderator caution!

Especially in a discussion analyzing the precision of revenue performance quarter-by-quarter, there's absolutely no excuse for some of the recent personal attacks, which have been edited or deleted.

Unless some want a forced vacation from this site, I'd recommend debating the topic and not attacking or insulting members. Thanks, Ocn Vw 1K, Moderator.
Ocn Vw 1K is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2014, 9:07 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
Interesting that AA just came off a pair of record quarters, and DL continues its multi-year winning streak, yet UA is being pumped off of unofficial results, and the two industry leaders' performance is being downplayed.

Quite interesting.
UA-NYC is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.