FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   "Expert Mode" Changes (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1385358-expert-mode-changes.html)

TravellingMan Sep 9, 2012 6:42 am


Originally Posted by TWA Fan 1 (Post 19281323)
Also, they won't be honest about doing this, because the carrot, the promise of GPU, is a powerful marketing tool that attracts customers to spend money with UA.

Good point. The carrot is what will keep people. I have seen that at Delta where their SWU is atrocious and there are still people buying YBM fares hoping for the upgrade.

I have used up most of my 2013 RPU/GPU. What is left of the GPU, I would rather use it on Lufthansa and be done with it. Now to use up the $ off certs before United enhances its products even more ;)

dmodemd Sep 9, 2012 6:49 am


Originally Posted by UA Insider (Post 19275211)
Hi Everyone,
This information displays for all customers and there is no ‘expert mode’ setting as there was on the previous site. So, turning it off, as a first step, really is helping mitigate a large volume of issues that our front line co-workers and other customers are experiencing.

Is the number of issues this was creating really greater than the number of issues and call center calls that are now going to be created by taking it away?


Originally Posted by UA Insider (Post 19275211)
Getting this information back into the hands of the “right” users is our next step. As many of you have suggested, the solution lies somewhere between adding this information as an option in a profile setting to providing even more detail in much smarter ways.

Then why not leave on the capability until you have implemented a solution for it, rather than creating the chaos from the elite users that is now ensuing. pmUA learned from past customer uproars where they reversed very unpopular decisions. Now, maybe UA can learn again?



Originally Posted by UA Insider (Post 19275211)
Getting this information back into the hands of the “right” users is our next step.

Then why not allow Expert Flyer continue to have access to this information? Truly those using EF are "Expert Flyers" and know the information and how best to use it without disturbing UA with "confusion". It just doesn't seem to make sense and appears to be a cover up to hide internal system problems (re: RPU/GPU upgrades) without addressing the root causes.

Please maintain the current minimal transparency until you have provided the adequate transparency that is needed.

sbm12 Sep 9, 2012 7:25 am


Originally Posted by dmodemd (Post 19281356)
Truly those using EF are "Expert Flyers" and know the information and how best to use it without disturbing UA with "confusion".

Sorry, but this is demonstrably false based on many of the posts/threads which show up here on a regular basis. Many know what the information means; many others do not.

danville 1K Sep 9, 2012 7:34 am


Originally Posted by ual1960 (Post 19280599)
But what about this merger has been well thought out? I laugh every time I see a CO-inspired wingwalker getting paid to do something useless every time we pushback because while current management admits that it was not done under United and is not needed, CO paid a guy to walk with the plane out and so shall the new UA. Boneheads. [This was in a merger article a few months ago.]

Or even worse, come in after midnight on an already delayed flight then sit on the ramp short of the gate for 15 minutes, with the GA waiting at the controls of the jet bridge and the main guide standing there, while they look for the wing men.

ijgordon Sep 9, 2012 7:42 am


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 19281464)

Originally Posted by dmodemd (Post 19281356)
Truly those using EF are "Expert Flyers" and know the information and how best to use it without disturbing UA with "confusion".

Sorry, but this is demonstrably false based on many of the posts/threads which show up here on a regular basis. Many know what the information means; many others do not.

Do you really think that many people that shell out $99/year for ExpertFlyer don't know how to use it properly? Or am I misunderstanding you?

sbm12 Sep 9, 2012 7:47 am


Originally Posted by ijgordon (Post 19281523)
Do you really think that many people that shell out $99/year for ExpertFlyer don't know how to use it properly? Or am I misunderstanding you?

I do not believe for a minute that all the EF subscribers fully understand how to interpret the information they're looking.

I absolutely believe that there are a number of very smart people, some of whom pay for access to tools like EF or KVS, who have no idea what the data they are seeing means. There are posts here all the time asking why XYZ didn't happen even though EF/KVS says PDQ. And those are just the folks brave enough to ask in this rather caustic environment.

Many people understand what the information means. Many others do not.

BDA Sep 9, 2012 7:49 am

Just a very bad move
 
As so many before has said, a lot of us used this information to a great extend. Taking it away is just such a bad move by United.

:mad:

rickscholz Sep 9, 2012 8:10 am

Looks like UA isn't the only airline doing this... NZ is now hiding R availability as well.

R Inventory No Longer Being Published.

PDX1K Sep 9, 2012 8:49 am

Horrible Change!!
 
Just want to add my voice to the chorus pointing out what a frustratingly stupid move this is on United's part. I've been a 1K for 18 straight years and this finally has me rethinking my loyalty. After all the pain of the merger and customer "enhancements" only now to be kicked one more time. Clearly customer satisfaction is not a priority at the new United.

PDX1K

edited to add that my UDU success rate was 85+% prior to 3/3, now it has gone down to less than 50%. Seems to be a heavy emphasis on ToD upsell.

elonepb Sep 9, 2012 8:53 am


Originally Posted by PDX1K (Post 19281793)
Just want to add my voice to the chorus pointing out what a frustratingly stupid move this is on United's part. I've been a 1K for 18 straight years and this finally has me rethinking my loyalty. After all the pain of the merger and customer "enhancements" only now to be kicked one more time. Clearly customer satisfaction is not a priority at the new United.

PDX1K

Same here. As a company policy we only buy fully refundable fares. Next year I'm taking my company's business elsewhere.

N1120A Sep 9, 2012 8:58 am

Wow - Just saw this. Talk about awful. I was actually wondering why I couldn't see R inventory on a recent flight. Interestingly, this post came up just a couple days after I spoke to someone at United about all the problems with transparency and United's loss of focus on customer service - especially for high level elites.

I guess its another reason to fly AA.

chinatraderjmr Sep 9, 2012 9:01 am


Originally Posted by rickscholz (Post 19281634)
Looks like UA isn't the only airline doing this... NZ is now hiding R availability as well.

R Inventory No Longer Being Published.

AA also for some reason hides there domestic inventory for "sticker" upgrades but does NOT hide there biz / first upgrade inventory for those with GPU's. I would accept this compromise if UA were to offer it

arisaa Sep 9, 2012 9:36 am


Originally Posted by rf11 (Post 19281060)
This seems to be an issue off conducting business with transparency vs. being opaque. The usual motivation to be opaque is to hide dishonesty or manipulative behavior. It seems that the United management is choosing to treat its customers in ways that they want to hide and this change by removing fare class information helps them be dishonest, immoral, or manipulative.

Why not admit it. We are not "loyal frequent flying customers", we are the "enemy". While the airline can manipulate fares (and everything else they can think of), how dare we want to do the same.

chinatraderjmr Sep 9, 2012 9:47 am


Originally Posted by NiceLanding (Post 19281091)
It's also possible that they're simply trying to hide their incompetence. Recognizing that their upgrade systems are such a convoluted mess that they couldn't make them work right if they wanted to, they're now trying to sweep the evidence under the rug. They perhaps hope to return to the glory days at CO, before they added all those annoying UA people, when they could just claim that everything was perfect and people would blindly believe them.

many former CO customers don't understand why UA customers bash CO at every turn. It's very simple. We all have a choice who we fly or do business with. Many of us former UA customers did not fly CO for the same reason we don't fly US or in some cases DL. In our opinion (remember, I said opinion, not fact), CO was not a trustworthy company or one we would trust to treat us well (as opposed to UA & AA who did not have that reputation. Now, after years and years of being loyal to UA, we have the rug pulled out from under us & find ourselves invested in a company we never wanted anything to do with in the first place (and every move they make proves us right). There is no difference then living in East Berlin before the Soviets moved in. One day a happy German answering to Bonn & the next a comrade answering to Moscow (ok, maybe not that bad :D

It's easy to say if you don't like it, go somewhere else but where??? Many of us invested a lot of time & money into the old UA & don't want to start from scratch with AA. Also, what happens if AA falls to US & has the same crap happen to them.

craz Sep 9, 2012 9:47 am


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 19280613)
it been posted >5 times in this thread and a separate thread has been start on the DIY approaches w/o involving an agent
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ing-codes.html

the problem is that EM not only showed if R>0 but also how many C seats remained. Thusly if I do the work-around and its comes up no R which flight do I book?, the 7am may have only 2 seats left in F or 2 in C while the 8am is wide open. As we all know looking at the seat map doesnt help that much. In my example the 8am will have a better chance of the RPU clearing then teh 7am

the same for GPU heading to NRT from NY R=0 but which flight is right now more open = better chance the UP will clear. It could 1 of the Pay sites can be beneficial but I see no reason to pay for something.


Now this morning for the 1st time I can remember since 3/3 I got an email telling me my IAD-HNL in Jan has cleared.Till now only 2 seats were taken and R=0, so maybe the system will work better now , over teh apst few months all of my WL for RPUs Only cleared when I noticed R>0 and I called up and had them clear me manually!

I mentioned to the rep how going forward when booking I imagine that I will be on the phone for anywhere from 1-2 hrs, reason I will ask to know what can be confirmed now for say a JFK-SFO-SAN/SNA/ONT/OHX/LAS/LAX flight if nothing that works for me then I will want to know what C is so that I can pick a flight where I feel my chances are better for the RPU to clear. Then for the return and probably for the following weekend as well if my 1st choice cant be confirmed at purchase.

She asked what I did till now, I said clicked onto 'Fare Class' and got everything I will now need from an agent to tell me, she said if enough of you guys do this it will tie up our lines and it will be just like it was on 3/4,I said exactly and thusly why the S in Jeffs last name stands for STUPID. She said she didnt blame me or anyone else since why book 1 flight when another has a better chance of clearing or why fly on Weds if you can go Tues or Thurs and get the Up


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.