Community
Wiki Posts
Search

May operational performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 9:01 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
It could have been a coincidence but I had more mechanical delays and cancellations in the last few months then I've had in the last 5 years combined.
bldr1k is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 9:10 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,218
Originally Posted by bldr1k
It could have been a coincidence but I had more mechanical delays and cancellations in the last few months then I've had in the last 5 years combined.
Mechanicals don't count The Airline lobby years ago convinced the DOT not to count mechanicals against them as it could "scare" customers away. The numbers we get are worthless. I'm not sure if they include intl but I don't think so. I just used an example. If UA has 100 flights and 99 are delayed but all due to mechanical, well they can say they have a 100% on time rate since only the one flight counts.
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 9:11 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MileagePlus Premier Gold
Posts: 11,522
UAL stock is up over 1 percent after-hours.

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/UAL
UnitedSkies is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 9:20 pm
  #19  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,160
Originally Posted by UnitedSkies
UAL stock is up over 1 percent after-hours.

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/UAL
might be do to this
United Continental reaches tentative agreement with AFA
United Airlines announced that the company has reached a tentative agreement with the Association of Flight Attendants, or AFA, covering flight attendants from the company's Continental subsidiary, almost three months ahead of the contract's amendable date. The agreement extends the current collective bargaining agreement for a term of 28 months beyond its September 1 amendable date. Flight attendants will vote on the agreement in the coming weeks.
link for United Reports May 2012 Operational Performance
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 4:21 am
  #20  
30 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,215
Originally Posted by trk1
only United had had total traffic increases

Delta, AA, US and SW all had total Revenue traffic decreases

my comment was correct that on time performance also improved
so things have not been worse than last year and traffic is not shifting to other carriers as this forum alleges every day
"Traffic" is not a terribly important metric. It's easy for an airline (any airline) to increase load factor by simply discounting tickets. It says almost nothing about revenue performance.

Originally Posted by trk1
Growth is growth. The actual revenue per mile is what matters. Easier to improve from a lower base.
Actually, in a business that has a perishable and finite product to sell "growth" of lower paying customers might not be a good thing @:-)

Especially when your competition appears to be selling at increasing prices.
PHLGovFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 4:28 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SFO and OAK
Programs: FAF, Hyatt <>, SPG PLT
Posts: 2,240
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
Actually, in a business that has a perishable and finite product to sell "growth" of lower paying customers might not be a good thing @:-)

Especially when your competition appears to be selling at increasing prices.
We are going to make it up on volume!
Beerman92 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 5:50 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Virginia
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 1,231
Originally Posted by PHLGovFlyer
"Traffic" is not a terribly important metric. It's easy for an airline (any airline) to increase load factor by simply discounting tickets. It says almost nothing about revenue performance.

Actually, in a business that has a perishable and finite product to sell "growth" of lower paying customers might not be a good thing @:-)

Especially when your competition appears to be selling at increasing prices.
I'm with trk1. I have seen thread after thread about the increase in UA prices not the other way around. Look on MR deals and you will see a much larger number of discounted fares on DL.

Last edited by Doug 1029; Jun 8, 2012 at 5:54 am Reason: bold
Doug 1029 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 6:26 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,318
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
Someone posted yesterday that UA has lost HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ELITES. If we believe that nugget of information, not only has UA last every single Elite, but they owe some as well to AA
I'm sure there are over 1MM combined elites now between the two airlines (remember in 2005, posted data showed 500K 2P, 250K 1P, 50K 1K, 20K GS, so close to 800K total). So not inconceivable!
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 6:32 am
  #24  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The World.
Programs: UA MP/UC - "RIP Tulip Plat"
Posts: 1,226
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
Uhhhhh.....I have always been a sceptic when it comes to UA losing business to other airlines. I don't think a few angry 1K and GS moving to AA will even budge the numbers. Someone posted yesterday that UA has lost HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ELITES. If we believe that nugget of information, not only has UA last every single Elite, but they owe some as well to AA
And yet we still see f cabins going out full with lists 60 deep! Seriously, elites haven't gone anywhere.
UAL4life is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 6:47 am
  #25  
30 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,215
Originally Posted by Doug 1029
I'm with trk1. I have seen thread after thread about the increase in UA prices not the other way around. Look on MR deals and you will see a much larger number of discounted fares on DL.
A few anecdotal observations on FT don't really represent the yield and PRASM performance metrics of UA versus other carriers. Sorry, but I'll stick with the corporate filings for such numbers.

IMO the jury is still out on this issue. I think we'll need to see several quarters worth of financials from all of the major U.S. airlines before we can draw informed conclusions. Also the recent steep drop in oil prices is going to tend to distort the overall bottom line performance of all carriers. PRASM comparisons are going to be the thing that matters to these discussions on FT.
PHLGovFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 7:16 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: United MM (formerly 1K), Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 550
My read of the MAY numbers....

Here is my read of the May over May numbers ...

PRASM +0.3% (Compare to Delta +6%) (Compare to US Air +6%) (Compare to LUV + 5to6%)
Seat Miles +0.4% (Compare to Delta -0.9%) (US Air +0.5%)
Load Factor -0.1% (Compare to Delta +0.2%) (US Air -1.1%)
On board Passengers -0.5% (Compare to delta -0.6%) (US Air -0.9%)

Nothing for UAL to be proud of....

Last edited by FlyingNut724; Jun 8, 2012 at 7:22 am
FlyingNut724 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 9:51 am
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,344
It's not getting any better... data from the last 2 weeks -

On time departure rate per 1000 completed flights by operating carrier:
Code:
 carrier | on_time_departure 
---------+-------------------
 DAL     |               883
 UAL     |               769
 AAL     |               774
 SKW     |               844
 EGF     |               835
 AWE     |               902
 FLG     |               848
 JBU     |               826
 TRS     |               915
 ACA     |               784
 AWI     |               789
 ASA     |               919
 RPA     |               854
On time arrival rate per 1000 completed flights by operating carrier:
Code:
 carrier | on_time_arrival 
---------+-----------------
 DAL     |             872
 UAL     |             772
 AAL     |             773
 SKW     |             828
 EGF     |             830
 AWE     |             861
 FLG     |             835
 JBU     |             824
 TRS     |             885
 ACA     |             657
 AWI     |             747
 ASA     |             894
 RPA     |             808
Delta is killing it. Heck even UA's express carriers out-do them.
mduell is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 10:12 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by FlyingNut724
Here is my read of the May over May numbers ...

PRASM +0.3% (Compare to Delta +6%) (Compare to US Air +6%) (Compare to LUV + 5to6%)
Seat Miles +0.4% (Compare to Delta -0.9%) (US Air +0.5%)
Load Factor -0.1% (Compare to Delta +0.2%) (US Air -1.1%)
On board Passengers -0.5% (Compare to delta -0.6%) (US Air -0.9%)

Nothing for UAL to be proud of....
I have a feeling the OP used to set up hedge transactions for JP Morgan given his level of analysis... these numbers are what matters, and are actually from financial reports...

I might add one more figure, AA announced its PRASM was UP 7.3%.

to give some context, while UA did not reveal its revenue for May, if one extrapolates from its Q1 figures, had they matched Delta/US's PRASM growth (which is a measure of the airlines ability to attract higher paying passangers, i.e. sell its seats for more money overall) it would have been another $151M in revenue for the month.

To give further context, the "loss" of this revenue, multiplied by 3 months = their loss last quarter. Extrapolate this lag in revenue over a year and its 1.8B in revenue loss. Not only material, but the difference between a profit and a loss.

And since costs are basically fixed, its all pure profit/loss.

Also note that the AA status match (if it effects them) will not begin to impact revenue heavily until probably next month. And the trend vs. AA/US/DL is that the gap between UAs PRASM and the competition has widened, i.e. UA is falling further behind, this year. This is what one would expect if they are loosing high value traffic.

Its all very, very bad for UA.

Last edited by spin88; Jun 8, 2012 at 10:30 am
spin88 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 11:57 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: AA EXP MM/UA MM/Marriott PLT Premier-LT PLT
Posts: 383
american posts strong imprivement

American posts strong gains/united flat

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/travel/american-airlines-parent-amr-sees-uptick-in-traffic-big-gain-in-key-revenue-measurement/2012/06/08/gJQA66H0NV_story.html

Last edited by unhappyflyer; Jun 8, 2012 at 12:14 pm
unhappyflyer is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 12:24 pm
  #30  
50 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA GS MM, Marriott Life Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Southwest Alist pref, various others of little note
Posts: 2,873
Originally Posted by FlyingNut724
Here is my read of the May over May numbers ...

PRASM +0.3% (Compare to Delta +6%) (Compare to US Air +6%) (Compare to LUV + 5to6%)
Seat Miles +0.4% (Compare to Delta -0.9%) (US Air +0.5%)
Load Factor -0.1% (Compare to Delta +0.2%) (US Air -1.1%)
On board Passengers -0.5% (Compare to delta -0.6%) (US Air -0.9%)

Nothing for UAL to be proud of....
The OP can cheerlead all he wants, but IMO the current environment (reasonable demand with reduced capacity over the past couple of years, leading to increased prices) means that all of the airlines should have seen PRASM increases. And they all did, except UA.
Boghopper is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.