Community
Wiki Posts
Search

May operational performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:28 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cle
Posts: 611
Smile May operational performance

Looks like the flyer talk naysayers have missed the mark again


United had the best operational performance numbers of the DL/AA/US/SW
group for May

the only carrier to have traffic gains for the month and improved on time starts compared to 2011
trk1 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:36 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: co, aa, ua, hilton, hyatt
Posts: 37
Uh, no, sorry...

According to FlightStats.com, United had the lowest on-time rating of any legacy carrier. it trailed Delta by nearly nine points. And its May PRASM growth was lower than Delta and US Airways. (AA doesn't report monthly PRASM now).

So, you're, uh, wrong. And, apparently, clueless...
lizinatizzy is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:37 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
PRASM was flat, which isn't particularly good.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:41 pm
  #4  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,140
Originally Posted by trk1
....United had the best operational performance numbers of the DL/AA/US/SW group for May ...
source?
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:42 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,218
I don't know and have not speculated where UA stands in regards to other carriers but they obviously have a terrible performance record lately. You say it's an improvement over last year and other carriers. O.K. But going from horrible to terrible is nothing to be proud of. I'd also like to see where those numbers come from. If they are D.O.T. numbers then they DON'T include mechanicals and I dont think they include Int flights. If an airline has 100 flights a day, 99 of which are delayed due to mechanicals, according to the D.O.T. They have a 100% on time record.

I guess we can really believe what we see, not a napkin

Originally Posted by sbm12
PRASM was flat, which isn't particularly good.
What is PRASM?? I've heard of it but don't have a clue

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jun 8, 2012 at 1:24 am Reason: language/merge
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:46 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cle
Posts: 611
stats

This week every carrier has reported operational results
(look at new releases from each carrier)
only United had had total traffic increases

Delta, AA, US and SW all had total Revenue traffic decreases

my comment was correct that on time performance also improved
so things have not been worse than last year and traffic is not shifting to other carriers as this forum alleges every day

Last edited by trk1; Jun 7, 2012 at 8:48 pm Reason: typing error
trk1 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:48 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 31
Passenger Revenue per Available Seat Mile
bkkman69 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:48 pm
  #8  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,752
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
What is PRASM?? I've heard of it but don't have a clue
probably something to do with money. it always is.

edit: oh haaaaay it is!
bob_the_d is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:50 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: co, aa, ua, hilton, hyatt
Posts: 37
PRASM = Passenger Revenue per Available Seat Mile. it is the key indicator of airline revenue.

United being flat means that it is actually losing ground since costs are way up over last year given just the higher jet-fuel costs.

By comparison, Delta's PRASM was up 6 percent in May and the market hammered airline stocks when DL released the numbers on Monday. US Airways also had a 6 percent increase in PRASM in May.

FYI, UA has lagged everyone in PRASM growth since March. In other words, it's clearly that people are booking away, especially higher-revenue flyers. That's why there is no revenue growth.
lizinatizzy is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:52 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
What is PRASM?? I've heard of it but don't have a clue
Passenger Revenue per Available Seat Mile
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:52 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cle
Posts: 611
Revenue generation

Revenue generation per seat mile comparisons depends on what each carrier
had in 2011. United had a higher base in 2011 so 1% gain still is a higher total rate. Check your data before making comments ( data from AirTransport World 2011 yearly data)
trk1 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:52 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,218
Originally Posted by trk1
This week every carrier has reported operational results
(look at new releases from each carrier)
only United had had total traffic increases

Delta, AA, US and SW all had total Revenue traffic increases

my comment was correct that on time performance also improved
so things have not been worse than last year and traffic is not shifting to other carriers as this forum alleges every day
Uhhhhh.....I have always been a sceptic when it comes to UA losing business to other airlines. I don't think a few angry 1K and GS moving to AA will even budge the numbers. Someone posted yesterday that UA has lost HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ELITES. If we believe that nugget of information, not only has UA last every single Elite, but they owe some as well to AA

Originally Posted by Bitterroot
Passenger Revenue per Available Seat Mile
Ahhhh. So this takes the place of the old numbers so they can add things like charging fees

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jun 8, 2012 at 1:25 am Reason: merge
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:52 pm
  #13  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,733
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B206 Safari/7534.48.3)

Originally Posted by lizinatizzy
Uh, no, sorry...

According to FlightStats.com, United had the lowest on-time rating of any legacy carrier. it trailed Delta by nearly nine points. And its May PRASM growth was lower than Delta and US Airways. (AA doesn't report monthly PRASM now).

So, you're, uh, wrong. And, apparently, clueless...
Sad. From "first" to "worst"
demkr is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 8:58 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cle
Posts: 611
Growth

Growth is growth. The actual revenue per mile is what matters. Easier to improve from a lower base.
trk1 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2012 | 9:00 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
Trying to interpret numbers on an airline of 2 merged lines is difficult at best, convoluted at worst. You cannot look at these numbers and tell how many high revenue passengers have bailed, what new business is in, how routes compare to pre-merger. I doubt anyone at WHQ is dancing in their cubicle, but I wouldn't look for anyone jumping from their windows either. Much more time will be necessary to tell whether this merger will succeed or be a huge failure (still my bet).
flyinbob is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.