![]() |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33913087)
CWS - do you think that total case numbers now will continue to decrease in the coming weeks to a point where we will see only single-digit thousands (similar to May/June 2021)?
Secondly, with a good chance now that over 95% of the UK population having either three doses, recovered, or both - where do we go from here? And what I mean by that is, do we abandon all restrictions and effectively move to normal life (or as normal as possible/new normal)? Almost everyone has had the chance to get three doses, millions have been infected, what is the logical next step here? As for the next stages, it turns out we will know tomorrow. The decision point, the O sub committee is being brought forward, and though there is some news management going on at the moment for tomorrow's newspapers ("finely balanced decision", yeah right), I can't see it being anything less than the Scottish changes. Maybe 2 stages - most restrictions abandoned tomorrow, and moving entirely to guidelines in a month perhaps - no statutory restrictions at all. |
Had a feeling Boris might throw in that swerve with masks, to rewrite some headlines. Good stuff.
Is it true we still don’t count reinfections? I know a lot of people who have caught it twice now, wouldn’t it mean our numbers are massively understated? Finally, what is going on with France? Still rising, almost 500k cases/d |
All COVID rules except for self isolation gone, that will be allowed to expire March 24 I believe.
So now what about travel? I guess Mr. Shapps announces bye bye day 2 tests? Got the expense down to 12 GBP per test now, but still would be great if they were gone. |
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
(Post 33915763)
All COVID rules except for self isolation gone, that will be allowed to expire March 24 I believe.
So now what about travel? I guess Mr. Shapps announces bye bye day 2 tests? Got the expense down to 12 GBP per test now, but still would be great if they were gone. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33915795)
I'd be keen to know as well if these tests will go - it will be good because more than anything now they are annoying and just another clearly unrequired barrier for travel.
|
Originally Posted by DaveS
(Post 33915816)
The UK tests are bearable and can be had for £8.95 a go. We need other countries to follow suit with easier testing rules. Asking for PCR's no more than 48 hours before arrival is a real problem on a long haul.
|
Originally Posted by DaveS
(Post 33915816)
The UK tests are bearable and can be had for £8.95 a go. We need other countries to follow suit with easier testing rules. Asking for PCR's no more than 48 hours before arrival is a real problem on a long haul.
|
Originally Posted by DaveS
(Post 33915816)
The UK tests are bearable and can be had for £8.95 a go. We need other countries to follow suit with easier testing rules. Asking for PCR's no more than 48 hours before arrival is a real problem on a long haul.
Regarding other countries, I agree with you, however, I'd say we need consistent guidelines/rules across as many countries as possible instead of literally different rules for every single country. Airlines have been screaming for this for the better part of the last 18 months, and we still find ourselves in a world where apart from regular entry rules/visas etc, you need to navigate Covid rules for every single place you travel to and transit through. |
This is what was said about travel testing today:
Downing Street has defended the decision to maintain the testing requirements for people arriving in the UK. Earlier, Boris Johnson told MPs an announcement on easing travel rules will be made "in the next few days". The PM also stressed the importance of people getting a booster jab if they want to travel abroad this summer. His official spokesman says "at this point in the pandemic" it was important to maintain the "extra layer of surveillance" to keep an eye out for the emergence of new variants abroad. |
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33916176)
Test being bearable doesn't mean they should remain, particularly when there is no need for them.
Regarding other countries, I agree with you, however, I'd say we need consistent guidelines/rules across as many countries as possible instead of literally different rules for every single country. Airlines have been screaming for this for the better part of the last 18 months, and we still find ourselves in a world where apart from regular entry rules/visas etc, you need to navigate Covid rules for every single place you travel to and transit through. |
Daily data:
Cases 108,069 (129,587 last Wednesday) Deaths 359 (398) Patients admitted 1,752 (2,066 on the 8th) Patients in hospital 18,979 (19,815 on the 11th) Patients in ventilation beds 703 (793 on the 11th) People vaccinated up to and including 18 January 2022: First dose: 52,151,643 Second dose: 48,019,069 Booster: 36,621,671 The rolling seven day daily average for cases is now down 37.2% on the previous week and the same measure for deaths is up 8.2%. The rolling 7 day daily average for deaths is 266.4 today. |
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
(Post 33916232)
I appreciate the desire for international consistency, but frankly that’s never going to happen. Countries have different visa and immigration requirements and always have done. Australia sprays stuff in the cabin when you land and gets excited about mud on your golf shoes and a stray apple you robbed from the lounge…. Etc. Even from a health perspective, different countries had requirements on yellow fever certs. I hope travel is going to get progressively easier, but I don’t expect it to be in any way consistent.
|
Originally Posted by HB7
(Post 33916536)
I think you're right. If we look around, even the EU countries don't have a consistent arrangement/agreement on this, which is just disappointing. It's a shame though because it seems travel may be complicated for some time to come.....
|
What happened, did you just declare the end of the pandemic already over there? No more "hands, face, just party at Boris' place" all day every day from now on? :p
So, are you going to stabilize at 50k-100k new cases a day every day from now on, no measures of any kind, and that will be the new normal? If you drop all measures, will you even sustain 50k new cases per day, or will it go back up to >100k+? Why is France rising so much, did they not get the memo that we are not doing the Covid thing anymore? :p |
Originally Posted by nk15
(Post 33917529)
What happened, did you just declare the end of the pandemic already over there? No more "hands, face, just party at Boris' place" all day every day from now on? :p
So, are you going to stabilize at 50k-100k new cases a day every day from now on, no measures of any kind, and that will be the new normal? If you drop all measures, will you even sustain 50k new cases per day, or will it go back up to >100k+? It will go well below that. And if the vast majority of people are not turning up in hospital does it really matter? Omicron was a potential threat to the road back to normal but clearly hasn't been anywhere near as much of a problem as feared. What would your plan be? And if you are suggesting continued restrictions and what do you think the disadvantages and costs would be for them? I think some folks don't seem to understand what the end game was going to be, that this would just become endemic, and just want to impose restrictions forever. Why is France rising so much, did they not get the memo that we are not doing the Covid thing anymore? :p |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:51 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.